I just wanted to add my confirmation that the new packages did indeed
restore GLX functionality for my system. Thank you all for the rapid
response today.
Hopefully the fix for CVE-2010-4818 won't be too onerous!
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2010-4818
--
You
Here are some other Ubuntu forums threads with users who are reporting
what seems to be the same issue and, in many cases, downgrading the
security update in order to restore functionality. This obviously is not
a good solution.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1864221
http://ubuntuforums.
I believe I am experiencing the same problem, and it has been reported by
another user on the Ubuntu forums:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1864567
The symptom is that no GLX application will run.
For example, compiz reports:
compiz (core) - Fatal: Root visual is not a GL visual
compiz
I think a DJVU filter for tracker would be an important addition. The
DJVU format is becoming popular amongst people doing DIY book scanning,
thanks to these excellent tools:
1) Scan Tailor, for image post-processing
http://scantailor.sourceforge.net/
2) djvubind, a script for Linux that creates
I can reproduce the segmentation fault in Lucid, 32-bit, with xulrunner
1.9.2.7.
--
Segmentation fault when trying to take a web screenshot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418248
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
Is this the same thing?
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26144
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #26144
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26144
--
Xorg freeze: "Failed to schedule IB" Radeon X1200
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586243
You received this bug no
>the bug described there has been fixed, if you still have an issue open
a new one
Three people in this thread have reported that the bug has not been
fixed for all PDFs when viewed in Evince.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug noti
I changed the status back to "new" to reopen this bug because, as per
the last series of messages, the fix to poppler does not fix the
rendering in Evince for all PDFs. Sorry if this wasn't the correct
action to take; I just wanted to make sure that the bug remains visible.
** Changed in: poppler
I've attached a screen shot of two pages of the PDF posted in comment
#52 as rendered by evince in Lucid (updated on April 11).
Check out the difference in the rendering in the thumbnail images on the
left. The thumbnail for page 9, which is anti-aliased, appears in grey
tones, while the thumbnail
For me, some of the pages of document posted in #52 are anti-aliased
with the patch in Lucid, and some of the pages in that same document are
not.
I haven't found any other PDF file like that in my collection of many
hundreds of PDF files (I didn't try all of them, just several
arbitrarily chosen
So then the bug can be left as is. I was just thinking that maybe
something about it could have been useful in some way.
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
That's fine by me, the original reporter. After the initial responses to
this bug, I decided I didn't really care about the matter.
I only added information today for people who might find this bug when
searching for information about using Zotero with Lucid.
Close the bug if it will improve stat
The java problem is version-dependent. For example, I'm using the
icedtea plugin with Zotero 2.02, Firefox 3.5.8 and OpenOffice.org 3.2
with no issues.
My understanding is that for Zotero's integration with OpenOffice.org to work
with Firefox ≥ 3.6, IcedTea6 1.7 is required, specifically the new
>there is no karmic change schedule for the moment no, lucid be stable
in 2 weeks
Yes, I know that lucid will be released shortly. But I myself will not
be upgrading immediately because I am working on a long project and I
want to wait until that is finished. The project involves a lot of
scanned-
I checked out the patched version with the Lucid Daily Live CD, and it
looks great. Thanks!
Is there any chance that the patch could be backported for Karmic?
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Yes, in the end, I do think it would be best to wait on packaging Zotero
for Ubuntu.
Perhaps it's worth noting that Zotero is not at all unstable from a
user's point of view, or at least, it's not for me. I've been using it
fairly extensively for over a year now and had no real problems (i.e.,
dat
@Dimitrios Symeonidis: Thanks for taking the time to post again, I
appreciate and accept your apology.
@John Vivirito:
@Alexander Sack:
I've been thinking about this project, and before proceeding, I'd like to talk
with you guys about how backports work for Firefox extensions that have been
pack
The OOo extension is specifically for Zotero. Basically, it allows Zotero to be
used as a Bibliography manager for OOo. You can see more about how it works
here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Zotero#Integration%20with%20OpenOffice.org
(There's a screenshot, too :).)
The Zotero extension is a
Hi john, and thanks for taking a look at this.
Zotero is in the "Suggested extensions missing details" section of this wiki
page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/List?action=show&redirect=MozillaTeam%2FFirefox3Extensions
I put it in that section because there is a question about t
There is an option to print a selection in Firefox 3 (tested with
firefox-3.0+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1).
In the GTK+ printing dialog (File -> Print), choose the Options tab. You
should see a check box for "Print Selection Only." It will be grayed out
unless a something has been selected in the te
So I had some more time to investigate, and in fact I think this is an
evince bug.
It is possible to open more than one file when using other PDF readers
(acroread, xpdf, epdfview).
Also, other plugins are able to open several documents in different tabs
at once (tested with DJVU files using djvi
Hmm, not to be argumentative, but it seems to me that there are a series
of Firefox extensions included in Ubuntu. For example:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adblock-plus
But maybe what you mean is that packages in the Universe repository are
not considered to be "in Ubuntu."
Like I said b
I'm not sure that Zotero is my "favorite extension," whatever that
means, but it is a useful if specialized tool for researchers and
students. And, I believe that including this kind of software in Ubuntu
will help with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1
Anyway, I've added a Zotero documenta
I can confirm this on hardy as well, with a clean installation of
mozplugger (i.e., with all mozpluggerrc and pluginreg.dat files
deleted). My computer is updated from hardy-proposed.
I found the following bug on the mozplugger bugzilla, that seems relevant:
https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cg
I'm sorry, it wasn't meant as an advertisement. I really would like to
see Zotero packaged for Ubuntu, and maybe to see if I can help out with
that.
I opened this bug because I thought that was expected. I was following the
instructions on the page for Firefox extensions in the Ubuntu wiki:
https
Public bug reported:
Zotero: http://www.zotero.org/
"Zotero [zoh-TAIR-oh] is a free, easy-to-use Firefox extension to help
you collect, manage, and cite your research sources. It lives right
where you do your work — in the web browser itself."
It's a very useful extension for anyone who does ac
@Chonnawonga
With the 2.6.22-14-generic kernel, no patch or module renaming is needed
on my machine. The AGP aperture size is recognized correctly and direct
rendering works with no modifications. Both amd64-agp and the stock,
unmodified version of sis-agp are loaded.
The only problem I experienc
>So they don't appear if both sis-agp and amd64-agp are loaded (which is
the normal case)?
No. Sorry I wasn't clear.
Here's what I observe:
1) sis-agp and amd64-agp are loaded -> APIC errors
2) only amd64-agp is loaded -> APIC errors
3) only sis-agp -> no APIC errors, but no drm module or direct
The APIC errors begin when the drm module is loaded:
Nov 15 12:59:29 menagerie kernel: [ 45.484698] [drm] Initialized radeon
1.27.0 20060524 on minor 0
Nov 15 12:59:31 menagerie kernel: [ 47.527659] agpgart: Found an AGP 3.0
compliant device at :00:00.0.
Nov 15 12:59:31 menagerie kernel:
I've installed Ubuntu now. :)
With linux-image-2.6.22-14-generic (version 2.6.22-14.46), the size of the AGP
aperture is identified correctly:
cat /var/log/dmesg | grep agpgart
[ 33.994241] Linux agpgart interface v0.102 (c) Dave Jones
[ 34.107968] agpgart: Detected AGP bridge 0
[ 34.111845
I had a chance to experiment with things some, and I think I made a
little progress. I was doing this on a Gentoo system with a 2.6.22
kernel compiled from gentoo-sources, but I don't think that makes a
difference. Although this is amd64 hardware, I'm using an x86 kernel/OS.
As I mentioned in the
@Neil Wilson
Hi,
We only took the route of deleting the module because I'm using a LiveCD and so
could not blacklist and reboot with that change saved. It's just a workaround
because I don't have an Ubuntu install at present (although I will install if
needed).
At this point, I think there are
I was able to delete the module from the busybox shell and then boot
into the LiveCD, and direct rendering is now working. Yay! And thanks
for the hand-holding, I don't have a lot of experience with LiveCDs.
There is one side effect I've noticed, however. I'm seeing lots of APIC errors
being writ
@Tormod
Well, I'm not able to remove the sis_agp module once it's been loaded during
the LiveCD boot, even after stopping gdm and manually removing all other
modules related to video (radeon, drm, amd64_agp) - agpgart cannot be removed
either, but that makes sense because it depends on sis_agp.
Hi,
I'm still seeing this problem with the i386 version of Ubuntu 7.10,
using the LiveCD. So, my experience is that the bug is not amd64 only.
The AGP aperture size is set to 128M in my BIOS. But agpgart only recognizes it
to be 4M:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo cat /var/log/dmesg | grep agpgart
[
I was looking at the upstream bug,
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278383 , and it looks like it is
only recorded there as a FreeBSD problem, as opposed to a problem for Linux
users as well. I wonder if that needs to be addressed?
I don't have an account on mozilla's bugzilla so I'm
Hi, sorry for the slow response and thank you very much for attending to
this bug. I wasn't able to reboot to try the Feisty beta CD until this
evening.
Unfortunately, things are still not working for me with Feisty. The xorg.log
indicates that agp could not bind and suggests verifying the order
37 matches
Mail list logo
