Re: [Bug 1431753] Re: Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer violation

2015-08-15 Thread J K Cunningham
re signed in to launchpad. > > HTH > > R. > > On 15/08/15 02:33, J K Cunningham wrote: >> On 08/14/2015 01:46 PM, teo1978 wrote: >>>> Are you aware that each comment triggers THOUSAND of emails to other >>> users? >>> >>> Are you aware th

Re: [Bug 1431753] Re: Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer violation

2015-08-14 Thread J K Cunningham
On 08/14/2015 01:46 PM, teo1978 wrote: >> Are you aware that each comment triggers THOUSAND of emails to other > users? > > Are you aware that you can unsubscribe if you want to? > > I unsubscribed from this bug report days ago and it's still sending me your silly tirades. Would you please STFU?

Re: [Bug 1268257] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: "objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file"

2015-01-23 Thread J K Cunningham
'... .tmp_nv.o': No such file" > > Thank you !! > Am 22.01.2015 um 17:18 schrieb J K Cunningham: >> Link at bottom of email. >> >> On 01/22/2015 02:37 AM, SillasOS wrote: >>> How to unsubscribe ? I have not subscribe to this email list ? It was >>

Re: [Bug 1268257] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: "objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file"

2015-01-22 Thread J K Cunningham
Link at bottom of email. On 01/22/2015 02:37 AM, SillasOS wrote: > How to unsubscribe ? I have not subscribe to this email list ? It was a > system report that do it. I dont want to receive lots of bug email > reports every day. How can I stop this ? > -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 1411763] [NEW] Random system error popups. System76 box with nVidia driver

2015-01-16 Thread J K Cunningham
Public bug reported: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Release:14.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: nvidia-331-updates-uvm 331.113-0ubuntu0.0.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-44.73-generic 3.13.11-ckt12 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-44-generic x86_

[Bug 717112] Re: LaTeX support broken and can no longer be installed

2011-02-11 Thread J K Cunningham
Well now, that was a most excellent observation. I grepped "MinionPro" in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ and turned up a reference to it in 10local.cfg. It was the only entry, in fact. I commented it out and was successfully able to install texlive-latex-base. That was exactly it. Now I'm wondering how it go

[Bug 717112] Re: LaTeX support broken and can no longer be installed

2011-02-11 Thread J K Cunningham
Thanks. But I assure you I haven't done anything knowingly with MinionPro. There isn't any such package in the Ubuntu repositories, and I haven't attempted to install anything like it. With the exception of the later version of zlib - which I removed - this is pretty much a vanilla 10.10 installati

[Bug 35407] Re: This package is missing its .pot file

2011-02-11 Thread J K Cunningham
Sorry, I dropped a digit in the cut/paste. That was bug #354073. The former would have been stale, indeed. Jeff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35407 Title: This package is missing its

[Bug 717112] Re: LaTeX support broken and can no longer be installed

2011-02-11 Thread J K Cunningham
Interesting. I had installed libz.so.1.2.5 from sources to satisfy the needs of another project. So I removed it and reinstalled the default zlib so it now has libz.so.1.2.3.4 like the header. I removed everything texlive-xxx and tex-common and started over from scratch. This time a ran into a new

[Bug 717112] Re: LaTeX support broken and can no longer be installed

2011-02-11 Thread J K Cunningham
I forgot to add the file fmtutil.ho7M82G6. Here it is. ** Attachment added: "fmtutil.ho7M82G6" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/717112/+attachment/1843276/+files/fmtutil.ho7M82G6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 717112] Re: LaTeX support broken and can no longer be installed

2011-02-11 Thread J K Cunningham
** Attachment added: "apt-get-texlive-latex-recommended.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717112/+attachment/1843274/+files/apt-get-texlive-latex-recommended.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 717112] [NEW] LaTeX support broken and can no longer be installed

2011-02-11 Thread J K Cunningham
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: texlive-base Yesterday morning I had a working LaTeX system on my 10.10 64-bit desktop. I do updates about every week, so nothing was very old. I attempted to install latex-cjk-korean and it failed, producing something like: dpkg: error processing tex-co

[Bug 717097] Re: package spider (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/games/spider', which is also in package ace-of-penguins 1.3-0ubuntu1

2011-02-11 Thread J K Cunningham
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717097 Title: package spider (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/games/spider', which is also in package ace-of- p

[Bug 717097] [NEW] package spider (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/games/spider', which is also in package ace-of-penguins 1.3-0ubuntu1

2011-02-11 Thread J K Cunningham
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: spider This bug might be due to a name conflict with the ace-of-penguins package. After noticing the error report icon and reading it, I tried to manually install spider and saw this error message: Unpacking spider (from .../spider_1.2-5_amd64.deb) ... d

[Bug 354073] Re: Issues Installing texlive in 8.10

2011-02-10 Thread J K Cunningham
I'm having the same problem in 10.10 on an AMD-64 system. texlive is broken. I tried uninstalling every package it complained about started from scratch several times. It appears you cannot have texlive-base texlive-latex-base and tex-common coexisting which makes it a pretty limited tex system. If

[Bug 712159] Re: package tex-common 2.08 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-02-02 Thread J K Cunningham
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712159 Title: package tex-common 2.08 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubun

[Bug 712159] [NEW] package tex-common 2.08 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-02-02 Thread J K Cunningham
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tex-common I was installing texlive-full and ended up with this error. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: tex-common 2.08 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKerne

[Bug 658372] Re: package spider (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/games/spider', which is also in package ace-of-penguins 1.3-0ubuntu1

2010-10-11 Thread J K Cunningham
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658372/+attachment/1684692/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Df.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658372/+attachment/1684693/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 658372] [NEW] package spider (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/games/spider', which is also in package ace-of-penguins 1.3-0ubuntu1

2010-10-11 Thread J K Cunningham
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: spider No additional info I can give you - I was using aptitude to install a whole series of educational games and noticed the crash report at some point. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: spider (not installed) ProcVersionSignatu

[Bug 631234] Re: audiophile 24/96 not working after 10.10 install

2010-09-24 Thread J K Cunningham
Maverick 10.10 fresh install. Same bug. I've had it before and previous fix doesn't work this time. -- audiophile 24/96 not working after 10.10 install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 588765] Re: I tried a clean install of emacs23 and related packages all at once. Bad idea. Still cleaning out the debris. Built it from source successfully afterwards.

2010-06-02 Thread J K Cunningham
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49511483/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49511484/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Df.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49511485/Df.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 588765] [NEW] I tried a clean install of emacs23 and related packages all at once. Bad idea. Still cleaning out the debris. Built it from source successfully afterwards.

2010-06-02 Thread J K Cunningham
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: emacs-snapshot This is a new install of 10.04 with almost nothing (extra) on it. I first tried to install the emacs23 but it locked the machine up and required a power cycle to reboot it. I then tried removing it - which was difficult, as every time I tou