On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 11.07.2012 21:28, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > as part of my bachelor thesis I'm working with the stamp9g20 / portuxg20
> > board from taskit (http://www.taskit.de/produkte/stamp9g20/index.htm). I
> >
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:07:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>
> > I include the old patch (portuxg20.patch) and the three patches I made in
> > this
> > email. My patches are based on u-boot v2012.04.01.
>
> Sorry, but it doesn't work like that. We don't read s
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 01:04:46AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 12.07.12 17:49, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >> On 11.07.2012 21:28, Markus Hubig wrote:
> >>> Now I'm in the process of adapti
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:21:00PM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> Hmm OK I disabled the watchdog and enabled debugging and now this
> is what I get at the first boot after flashing:
>
> | RomBOOT
> |
> |
> | U-Boot 2012.04.01-3-gab465ef-dirty (Jul 18 2012 - 15:08:22)
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:08:51PM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:21:00PM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > Hmm OK I disabled the watchdog and enabled debugging and now this
> > is what I get at the first boot after flashing:
> >
> > | RomBOOT
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:03:25AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Markus Hubig,
>
> In message <20120720142655.gb20...@imko.de> you wrote:
> >
> > And the only setting I found in my board support code (stamp9g20.h)
> > that is obviously realated to this &quo
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 05:43:28PM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> I looked at every single byte on the internet an I found some information
> that in order to get this bad-ass relocation to work, one needs to adapt
> at91bootstrap to work with u-boot. Could this be my problem? At the mom
Hi @all,
one minor Problem I often read about in this list is some crappy / unreadable
console output at beginning of the U-Boot start procedure. Now I have the same
"visual" Problem.
| H�NAND: 128 MiB
| *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment
|
| In:serial
| Out: serial
| Err:
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
board/taskit/stamp9g20/Makefile| 52
board
at91 boards but I wonder how we
> should handle these while-loops without content.
Oh I didn't recognice there is a version of checkpatch provided with
u-boot. I used the one from kernel.org which didn't put a warning out
for this one ...
> On 30.07.12 20:01, Markus Hubig wrote
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9260_devices.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9260_devices.c
b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9260_devices.c
index 62f76fa
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
MAINTAINERS|4 +
board/taskit
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:59:10PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 01.08.12 21:57, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > +Markus Hubig
> > +
> > + STAMP9G20 ARM926EJS
> > +
> > Ilko Iliev
>
> unfortunately Ilko Iliev is wrong here ... this is the PPC sect
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:21:04PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 01.08.12 21:28, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >>> + /* Need to reset PHY -> 500ms reset */
> >>> + writel(A
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
MAINTAINERS| 16 ++-
board
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 30.07.12 20:01, Markus Hubig wrote:
> >
> > +int board_early_init_f(void)
> > +{
> > + struct at91_pmc *pmc = (struct at91_pmc *)ATMEL_BASE_PMC;
> > +
> > + /* Enable c
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:28:30PM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:21:04PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> > On 01.08.12 21:28, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> > >>> + /*
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
MAINTAINERS| 16 ++-
board
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
MAINTAINERS| 16 ++-
board
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:05:03AM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
> Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
> file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Ignore this. I started a new th
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:01:40PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 06.08.2012 11:11, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
> > Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
> > file. PortuxG20 is basically a
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:46:49PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> Dear Markus Hubig,
>
> One more thing to mention!
> stamp9g20.c: In function 'stamp9G20_macb_hw_init':
> stamp9g20.c:113:2: warning: suggest parentheses around arithmetic in
> operand of '|
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:49:22PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 06.08.2012 15:46, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >
> > One more thing to mention!
>
> and some more ;)
> Please test your code with the MAKEALL script before sending.
| $ ./MAKEALL portuxg20 stamp9g20
| Configuring for portuxg2
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:49:51PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 02.08.2012 16:14, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >> On 30.07.12 20:01, Markus Hubig wrote:
> >
> > PC9 is somewhat strange. If I set
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:01:40PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 06.08.2012 11:11, Markus Hubig wrote:
> >
> > +static unsigned int saved_state[3] = {STATUS_LED_OFF,
> > + STATUS_LED_OFF, STATUS_LED_OFF};
> > +
> > +void coloured_LED_init(void)
>
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
Changes for v2:
- Added myself to the MAINTAINERS
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
Changes for v2:
- Added myself to the MAINTAINERS
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:44:18AM +0530, Thirumalesha N wrote:
> I'm porting u-boot for mpc8280 based CPU board by taking mpc8260ads
> reference, its hanging at some some point. i enabled debug mode.
> U-Boot 1.3.1 (Aug 8 2012 - 09:19:16)
> New Stack Pointer is: 1ffa0f48
>
> please can you sugg
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 08:15:43AM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 05:16 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > one minor Problem I often read about in this list is some crappy /
> > unreadable
> > console output at beginning of the U-Boot start procedure. Now I have the
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:22:11AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 27.07.12 11:16, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > one minor Problem I often read about in this list is some crappy /
> > unreadable
> > console output at beginning of the U-Boot start procedure. Now I have the
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:12:51PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 07:17 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 08:15:43AM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> >> On 07/27/2012 05:16 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
>
> >> 2) The line before the garb
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:03:55PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 14.08.2012 11:08, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:22:11AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >> On 27.07.12 11:16, Markus Hubig wrote:
> >>> Has anyone an ideea how to fix this?
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:33:26PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 16.08.2012 17:07, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > But it definitly dosn't work here. I checked with an oscilator, if I toggle
> > the pin in board_init() I can nicely see it going high and low but i
board_early_init_f() so we
enable the serial output early within board_postclk_init().
Unfortunately the board_postclk_init() function was not called in the
init_sequence of arch/arm/lib/board.c so the first patch will added it there.
---
Markus Hubig (2):
arm: Adds board_postclk_init to the init_sequence
The board_postclk_init() function can be used to perform operations
that requires a working timer early within the U-Boot init_sequence.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Albert ARIBAUD
---
arch/arm/lib/board.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm
| DRAM: 64 MiB
| WARNING: Caches not enabled
| NAND: 128 MiB
| In:serial
| Out: serial
| Err: serial
| Net: macb0
| Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
board/taskit/stamp9g20/stamp9g20.c | 21 +
include/configs
Hello Albert, hello Andreas,
any news if this two patches can get accepted?
Cheers, Markus
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Markus Hubig wrote:
> In order to use the serial interface on the PortuxG20 we need to enable the
> level converter first by setting the PC9 pin to high. The
37 matches
Mail list logo
