Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: switch armltd vexpress to GENERIC_BOARD

2015-01-29 Thread Chris Kuethe
Bump. Anyone want to comment or commit? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/431675/ On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote: > only tested tested under QEMU with vexpress_ca9x4 ("-M vexpress-a9") and > vexpress_ca15_tc2 ("-M vexpress-a15"). Make

[U-Boot] [PATCH] RSA depends on DM

2015-02-02 Thread Chris Kuethe
Discovered while experimenting with signature checking on vexpress which doesn't typically use DM. Rather than complaining about unmet dependencies it might be better to enable those them. --- lib/rsa/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/lib/rsa/Kconfig b/lib/rsa/Kconfig in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] RSA depends on DM

2015-02-03 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > +Masahiro > > Hi Chris, > > On 3 February 2015 at 00:42, Chris Kuethe wrote: >> Discovered while experimenting with signature checking on vexpress >> which doesn't typically use DM. Rather than complaining abou

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] RSA depends on DM

2015-02-04 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > We certainly must avoid the build break. > > My concern is that CONFIG_DM may introduce a run-time break. For > example if you don't have pre-relocation malloc() available the board > may not boot. Driver model is a fundamental core feature, and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] RSA depends on DM

2015-02-04 Thread Chris Kuethe
Discovered while experimenting with signature checking on vexpress which doesn't typically use DM. --- Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig index fed488f..8090790 100644 --- a/Kconfig +++ b/Kconfig @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ config FIT_VERBOSE config FIT_SIGNATUR

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mx5: move to a standard arch/board approach

2015-03-26 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:49 AM, wrote: > > From: Andrej Rosano > > Move the MX5 based boards to arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5, following the > commit: 89ebc82137bebb11a8191f8b9cbf08f2533ae8bc > > Signed-off-by: Andrej Rosano > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Vagrant Cascadia

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: mx5: add support for USB armory board

2015-03-26 Thread Chris Kuethe
CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC as it must always be present > - Remove explicit GPIO input setup (all GPIO are input after reset) > - Remove dummy board_late_init() and CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INIT > - Remove CONFIG_BOOTARGS > - Fix compiling errors due to config_distro_bootcmd.h inclusion positio

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: mx5: add support for USB armory board

2015-03-26 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Andrej Rosano wrote: > Please note that the patch is prepared against imx tree and not the > mainline one, where the "arch/board approach" is not yet merged. OK, it all works for me. -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: mx5: add support for USB armory board

2015-03-31 Thread Chris Kuethe
Any chance of this being accepted into 2015.04? On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Andrej Rosano wrote: > >> Please note that the patch is prepared against imx tree and not the >> mainline one, where the "arch/boa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 1/2] ARM: mx5: move to a standard arch/board approach

2015-04-08 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:56 AM, wrote: > From: Andrej Rosano > > Move the MX5 based boards to arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5, following the > commit: 89ebc82137bebb11a8191f8b9cbf08f2533ae8bc > > Signed-off-by: Andrej Rosano > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Vagrant Cascadian

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 2/2] ARM: mx5: add support for USB armory board

2015-04-08 Thread Chris Kuethe
Stefano Babic > Cc: Chris Kuethe > Cc: Fabio Estevam > Cc: Vagrant Cascadian Works for me Tested-by: Chris Kuethe ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] patch: fix typo in mxc_hab docs

2015-06-02 Thread Chris Kuethe
diff --git a/doc/README.mxc_hab b/doc/README.mxc_hab index a1b1d34..5fe977c 100644 --- a/doc/README.mxc_hab +++ b/doc/README.mxc_hab @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SEC_COMPAT4 /* HAB version */ CONFIG_FSL_CAAM CONFIG_CMD_DEKBLOB -CONFIG_SYS_FSL_LE +CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SEC_LE

[U-Boot] patch - arm - define SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE for mx5

2015-06-02 Thread Chris Kuethe
-by: Chris Kuethe Cc: Tom Rini Cc: Matthew Starr Cc: Andrej Rosano Cc: Stefano Babic Cc: Chris Kuethe Cc: Fabio Estevam Cc: Marek Vasut diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h index f059d0f..5f0e1e6 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/as

Re: [U-Boot] patch - arm - define SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE for mx5

2015-06-08 Thread Chris Kuethe
Bump... can this be merged? On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote: >> mx5 is a cortex-a8 which has 64 byte cache lines. i'll need this for >> adding gadget support to usbarmory, but it's a property com

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

2015-06-13 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > With this option enabled each compilation creates the exact > same binary. There are no timestamps, with which a U-Boot > binary can be identified. Works on usbarmory. Tested-by: Chr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: imximage: add new CHECK/CLR BIT command

2015-06-15 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > While I agree we ought to use SPL as much as possible I also believe > the DCD support should be as complete as possible; some people might > have reasons to avoid the SPL and rely on DCD for it. > > Do you believe SPL can be assumed to be

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

2015-03-05 Thread Chris Kuethe
I'll be able to test this next week, but I'd like to see usbarmory be a supported board. On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:03 AM, wrote: > From: Andrej Rosano > > Add support for Inverse Path USB armory board, an open source > flash-drive sized computer based on Freescale i.MX53 SoC. > > http://inverse

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

2015-03-16 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:03 AM, wrote: > From: Andrej Rosano > > Add support for Inverse Path USB armory board, an open source > flash-drive sized computer based on Freescale i.MX53 SoC. > > http://inversepath.com/usbarmory > > Signed-off-by: Andrej Rosano Tested-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

2015-03-16 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Chris Kuethe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:03 AM, wrote: >> From: Andrej Rosano >> >> Add support for Inverse Path USB armory board, an open source >> flash-drive sized computer based on Freescale i.MX53 SoC. >> &g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

2015-03-17 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote: > >> U-Boot 2015.04-rc3-00209-ga74ef40-dirty (Mar 15 2015 - 22:04:22) >> >> CPU: Freescale i.MX53 rev2.1 at 800 MHz >> Reset cause: WDOG > > Here

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

2015-03-18 Thread Chris Kuethe
Stefano Babic > Cc: Chris Kuethe > Cc: Fabio Estevam Tested-by: Chris Kuethe --- I don't have the default kernel image in place; the board boots when I do point it at a valid image. U-Boot 2015.04-rc4-dirty (Mar 18 2015 - 16:12:11) CPU: Freescale i.MX53 rev2.1 at 800 MHz Reset cau

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] arm: mx5: Add support for USB armory board

2015-03-24 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Unfortunately, this fails to build with numerous errors such as: Heh. I was just about to go investigate that. > ... > +#include > + > #define MEM_LAYOUT_ENV_SETTINGS \ This section works for me. > I'd like to propose only setting b

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: switch armltd vexpress to GENERIC_BOARD

2015-01-21 Thread Chris Kuethe
only tested tested under QEMU with vexpress_ca9x4 ("-M vexpress-a9") and vexpress_ca15_tc2 ("-M vexpress-a15"). Makes the ugly warning go away. Signed-off-by: Chris Kuethe --- include/configs/vexpress_common.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --g