Hi Simon,
Yes it is a V2 patch.
Sorry I missed the add the same will submitting the patch.
Regards,
Rajeshwari Shinde.
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Rajeshwari Shinde
>> wrote:
>>>
Dear Minkyu Kang,
In message <50c58623.3090...@samsung.com> you wrote:
...
> @@ -337,7 +341,7 @@ static void init_pmic_lcd(void)
> unsigned char val;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
> + struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
>
> if (pmic_probe(p)
Hi Wolfgang,
> Dear Minkyu Kang,
>
> In message <50c58623.3090...@samsung.com> you wrote:
> ...
> > @@ -337,7 +341,7 @@ static void init_pmic_lcd(void)
> > unsigned char val;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > - struct pmic *p = get_pmic();
> > + struct pmic *p = pmic_get("MAX8998_PMIC");
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Hesselbarth [mailto:sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 December 2012 14:02
> To: Sebastian Hesselbarth
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Rabeeh Khoury; Albert Aribaud; Prafulla
> Wadaskar; Andy Fleming; Joe Hershberger; Daniel Stodden; Luka Perkov
Dear Wolfgang,
On 10/12/12 18:32, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
>> Dear Minkyu Kang,
>>
>> In message <50c58623.3090...@samsung.com> you wrote:
>> ...
>>> @@ -337,7 +341,7 @@ static void init_pmic_lcd(void)
>>> unsigned char val;
>>> int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> - struct pmic *p = g
On 12/10/2012 07:50 AM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
This patch fix following errors
universal.c: In function 'init_pmic_lcd':
universal.c:340: warning: implicit declaration of function 'get_pmic'
universal.c:340: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a
cast
universal.c: In function
Dear Lukasz Majewski,
In message <20121210103224.372c572e@amdc308.digital.local> you wrote:
>
> > This is unrelated to your patch - but what if pmic_get() returns NULL?
> >
> > pmic_probe() will crashif you pass it a NULL pointer...
>
> The PMIC 2.0 uses malloc to allocate pmic structure.
...a
Dear lokesh nijalinge,
In message
you wrote:
>
> I am using the TI's DM3730 processors for one of my project. I want to
> *receive
> 1Kb of data* from UART2. At kernel i am able to send and receive full 1Kb
> of data.
> I am sending a buffer of 1Kb at UART2 and able to receive only 64 Bytes of
Resolved the compilation errors for PMIC MAX77686 on SMDK5250.
Based on resolve branch of u-boot-samsung.
Rajeshwari Shinde (2):
POWER: MAX77686: Modified as per the latest Implementation
SMDK5250: Enable pmic MAX77686
board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250.c | 15 +++-
drivers/misc/pmic_max7768
Moved the pmic_max77686.c max77686_pmic.h to drivers/power
and made required changes accordingly
Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde
---
drivers/misc/pmic_max77686.c | 42 --
drivers/power/pmic/Makefile|1 +
drivers/power/pmic/pmic_max77686.c | 48 +++
include/
Enabled pmic MAX77686 for SMDK5250.
Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde
---
board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250.c | 15 +++
include/configs/smdk5250.h|8
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250.c
b/board/samsung
Dear Minkyu,
The idea was to have Exynos4x10 and Exynos4x12 separately instead of
Exynos4.
As for now, when we use ex. exynos4_gpio_part1 it is not obvious which
Exynos we refer to.
Best regards,
Piotr Wilczek
From: Minkyu Kang [mailto:proms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07
Hi,
I'm newbie and I want to use scripts to test the board peripherals (I2C,
SPI, LAN, PCIe, USB, ...) using u-boot.
My problem is how to compare the reading with the expected value?
the reading is in an environment variable? If so which one?
I searched the forums and docs without success.
Than
Hi Sir,
Thanks for the reply.
I am trying to read around 1Kbyte of data from the serial port uart2.
Standard serial console is uart1.
I am using the function* NS16550_init() in drivers/serial/ns16550.c* file
for the console initialization or configuration.
I am using functions* NS16550_putc() *for
Dear lokesh nijalinge,
please don't top post / full quote.
In message
you wrote:
>
> I am trying to read around 1Kbyte of data from the serial port uart2.
> Standard serial console is uart1.
> I am using the function* NS16550_init() in drivers/serial/ns16550.c* file
> for the console initializ
Dear Khalid Tourabi,
In message <50c5c063.2020...@planar.com> you wrote:
>
> I'm newbie and I want to use scripts to test the board peripherals (I2C,
> SPI, LAN, PCIe, USB, ...) using u-boot.
> My problem is how to compare the reading with the expected value?
> the reading is in an environment va
Hi Rajeshwari,
> Resolved the compilation errors for PMIC MAX77686 on SMDK5250.
> Based on resolve branch of u-boot-samsung.
>
> Rajeshwari Shinde (2):
> POWER: MAX77686: Modified as per the latest Implementation
> SMDK5250: Enable pmic MAX77686
>
> board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250.c | 15
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 11:38:11AM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 10:58:53 AM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Scott,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 12:53:34PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:18:39PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > > On 11/28/2012 03:06:00 PM, Phil Sutt
PMIC 2.0 require to test return pointer from pmic_get()
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
Cc: Lukasz Majewski
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c
b/board/samsung/universal
Patches mostly provides a new flash command (QPP), config register writing
and some print support on flash read/write.
Thanks,
Jagan.
Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki (4):
sf: Enable prints on erase and write functions
sf: Add print message on flash read function
sf: Add configuration register
This patch provides to enabled the prints on erase and write
functions to make sure that how many bytes erase/write into flash device.
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
---
drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/m
This patch adds a print message on spi_flash_cmd_read_fast()
to make sure that how many bytes read from flash device.
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
---
drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_fla
This patch provides support to program a flash config register.
Configuration register contains the control bits used to configure
the different configurations and security features of a device.
User need to set these bits through spi_flash_cmd_write_config()
based on their usage.
Signed-off-by:
This patch provides support to program a flash using
Quad-input Page Program(32h) instruction.
This will effectively increases the data transfer rate
by up to four times, as compared to the Page Program(PP) instruction.
Respective flash drivers need to use spi_flash_cmd_write_multi_qpp()
based on
Dear Khalid Tourabi,
please don't top post / full quote, and keep the mailing list on Cc:
In message <50c5f2d6.5060...@planar.com> you wrote:
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> setexpr command allows set the result operation in an environment
> variable.
> But I want to set the re
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 09:57:28PM +0100, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> please pull two bugfixes for MIPS
>
>
> The following changes since commit fd4d564b3c80b111f18c93adb14233a6a7ddb0e9:
>
> Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86 (2012-12-07
> 08:47:59 -0700)
>
>
When accessing nand any bad blocks encountered are skipped, with no
indication about the amount of bad blocks encountered.
While this is normally fine, when you have to write a large amount
of data in chunks, you need to account for the skipped amount due
to the presence of the bad blocks.
nand_ex
Introduce on-the fly DFU NAND support.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
---
drivers/dfu/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/dfu/dfu.c | 7 ++
drivers/dfu/dfu_nand.c | 194 +
include/dfu.h | 23 ++
4 files changed, 225 insertions(+)
cr
Will do.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems like two commits 5ddcc38b (in u-boot, committed by Marek)
> 29f3e3f2 (in u-boot-arm, committed by Tom from u-boot-tegra) are
> conflicting on the seaboard configuration header file for USB (and
> possibly other
- commit 418396e212b59bf907dbccad997ff50f7eb61b16 chenged the behaviour
of nand write.raw which now takes a pagecount as a parameter and no more
the size to be written so update the default environment of these boards
to fix the problem.
- tested on a mx28evk with a 4k page NAND and on a custom boa
Dear Eric Bénard,
> - commit 418396e212b59bf907dbccad997ff50f7eb61b16 chenged the behaviour
> of nand write.raw which now takes a pagecount as a parameter and no more
> the size to be written so update the default environment of these boards
> to fix the problem.
> - tested on a mx28evk with a 4k
Albert,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Tom Warren wrote:
> Will do.
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> It seems like two commits 5ddcc38b (in u-boot, committed by Marek)
>> 29f3e3f2 (in u-boot-arm, committed by Tom from u-boot-tegra) are
>> conflicting
Simon,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 12/04/2012 01:40 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> Am Dienstag, den 04.12.2012, 13:22 -0700 schrieb Tom Warren:
>>> [...]
>
>> +#define V_NS16550_
Hi Pantelis,
> DFU is a bit peculiar. It needs to hook to composite setup and
> return it's function descriptor.
>
> So when get-descriptor request comes with a type of DFU_DT_FUNC
> we iterate over the configs, and functions, and when we find
> the DFU function we call the setup method which is
On 12/10/2012 01:33:52 AM, Deltour, Stephane wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the confirmation.
Is this something that may be patched ?
I mean, would a patch for this be accepted ?
Yes, please send a patch.
-Scott
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
Hi Lukasz,
On Dec 10, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Pantelis,
>
>> DFU is a bit peculiar. It needs to hook to composite setup and
>> return it's function descriptor.
>>
>> So when get-descriptor request comes with a type of DFU_DT_FUNC
>> we iterate over the configs, and functio
Dear Wolfgang Denk
Dear Khalid Tourabi,
please don't top post / full quote, and keep the mailing list on Cc:
Ok sorry thanks.
In message<50c5f2d6.5060...@planar.com> you wrote:
Thanks for your answer.
setexpr command allows set the result operation in an environment
vari
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Tom Warren wrote:
> Simon,
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 12/04/2012 01:40 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hi Tom,
Am Dienstag, den 04.12.2012, 13:22
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:59:59AM -0800, Tom Warren wrote:
> Albert,
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Tom Warren wrote:
> > Will do.
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
> > wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> It seems like two commits 5ddcc38b (in u-boot, committed by Marek)
>
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
wrote:
> This patch provides to enabled the prints on erase and write
> functions to make sure that how many bytes erase/write into flash device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c
Hey all,
I pushed earlier (and it's live now) an update making the next branch be
in-sync with master. Seeing as for this release we do not have any
planned changes that will require a rebase (last time we wanted the very
first commits to be to switch to the right fix for ARM and alignment
stuff)
Pantelis,
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On Dec 10, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>
> > Hi Pantelis,
> >
> >> DFU is a bit peculiar. It needs to hook to composite setup and
> >> return it's function descriptor.
> >>
> >> So when get-descriptor request comes with a type of DFU_DT_FUNC
> >> we iter
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:20:58PM -, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
>
> ---
> pretty sure that comment is inaccurate, but i'm willing to be
> corrected.
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 07:40:28AM -, Peter Barada wrote:
> Instead of passing individual registers by value to board_get_mem_timings,
> pass a board_mem_timings structure pointer for the board files to fill in.
> Pass same structure pointer to write_sdrc_timings. This saves about
> 90 bytes
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 07:57:54AM -, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> No functional changes, just more comments for readability when a
> preprocessor check spans more than a few lines, and for consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signatu
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 08:12:08AM -, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> No functional changes, simply for readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-B
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:21:18AM -, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> Git commit d417d1db5f9092d125ddea882ced77eaa5f3d236 replaced the
> omap-common file reset.S with reset.c, but the Makefile was not
> adjusted for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
-
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:06:33PM -, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> DMM_LISA_MAP registers program whether memory is mapped
> on particular EMIF or not. Irrespective of these registers
> EMIF is getting configured. Correcting the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, th
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 09:10:15PM -, Ajoy Kumar Das wrote:
> From: ajoy
>
> Added posted writes (read after writes) to effect the
> change immediately for channel confiuration and channel
> enable register
>
> Disable the channel to purge receieve data in TX_ONLY
> mode transfer otherwise
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:45:12AM -, Davide Bonfanti wrote:
> The reset procedure works on watchdog timer while before it was modifying
> TIMER_1 registers.
> Tested on DM365.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davide Bonfanti
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digi
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:30:42AM -, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> From: Yegor Yefremov
>
> According to errata the AM335x device does not support internal delay
> mode, so RGMII1_IDMODE and RGMII2_IDMODE must be set to 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:03:16AM -, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> From: Yegor Yefremov
>
> Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:32:40AM -, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Remove the unused PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE from OMAP3 config files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weber
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:40:57PM -, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> Add gpio_is_valid() to omap_gpio API
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryanov
> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:23:16AM -, Vincent Stehl?? wrote:
> We add a return code to wait_for_bb() to be able to report errors to the
> callers properly. We in turn handle this new error code in i2c_read, i2c_write
> and i2c_probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehl??
Applied to u-boot-ti/ma
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:23:17AM -, Vincent Stehl?? wrote:
> We handle i2c_write return code and complain in case of error. We propagate
> the
> error, too, to allow better handling at the upper level in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehl??
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:28:26PM -, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> Enable zero bootdelay check to make it possible to abort autoboot even if
> bootdelay == 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryanov
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:14:57AM +0100, Andreas Bie??mann wrote:
> These GPMC_CS defines are a leftover from prior gpmc_init(). Commit 187af954
> removed the need for these definitions but missed to remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Bie??mann
> Cc: Tom Rini
Applied to u-boot-ti/master,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:19:24PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:19:25PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Added macros to read SOM information from the I2C
> EEPROM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:06:27AM +0100, Ilya Yanok wrote:
> These series add support for NAND on AM33XX. AM33XX has the same GPMC
> controller as OMAP3 so the first part of the series just add required
> defines/initialization to enable the existing omap_gpmc driver to work
> on AM33XX. The rest
Hello,
The following changes since commit b8a7c467960ffb4d5a5e1eef5f7783fb6f594542:
Merge branch 'u-boot-imx/master' into 'u-boot-arm/master' (2012-11-25
13:01:58 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git master
for you to fetch changes up to 9bd5c1ad
u-boot-arm/master and u-boot-tegra/next should have the same base
commit (b8a7c46), so merging them isn't a big deal, and goes smoothly
for me. If I then take u-boot/master and merge it, I see a conflict in
drivers/power/power_fls.c and include/configs/mx35pdk.h and
mx53loco.h, but no problems with
Albert,
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> It seems like two commits 5ddcc38b (in u-boot, committed by Marek)
>> 29f3e3f2 (in u-boot-arm, committed by Tom from u-boot-tegra) are
>> conflicting on the seaboard configuration header file for USB (and
>> possib
On 12/10/2012 09:24:24 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
When accessing nand any bad blocks encountered are skipped, with no
indication about the amount of bad blocks encountered.
While this is normally fine, when you have to write a large amount
of data in chunks, you need to account for the skipped
On 12/10/2012 10:41:59 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
- commit 418396e212b59bf907dbccad997ff50f7eb61b16 chenged the
behaviour
of nand write.raw which now takes a pagecount as a parameter and no
more
the size to be written so update the default environment of these
boards
to fix the problem.
It ne
Dear Lukasz Majewski,
> Pantelis,
[...]
Hm hm ... I suspect it'd be nice to have a separate DFU custodian. That'd
leverage some burden from me. I like that idea. I wonder if it'd be nice to
start building such bigger net of custodians.
Hm ?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
__
On 12/10/2012 09:24:32 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Introduce on-the fly DFU NAND support.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
---
drivers/dfu/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/dfu/dfu.c | 7 ++
drivers/dfu/dfu_nand.c | 194
+
include/dfu.h
In the current source tree, in disk/part_efi.c , we see:
/*
* Problems with CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA:
*
* struct disk_partition.start in include/part.h is sized as ulong.
* When CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA is activated, lbaint_t changes from ulong
to uint64_t.
* For now, it is cast back to ulong at assi
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:09:55PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 09:24:32 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >Introduce on-the fly DFU NAND support.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
> >---
> > drivers/dfu/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/dfu/dfu.c | 7 ++
> > drivers/dfu/dfu_nand
Dear Wolfram Sang,
> It could happen (1 out of 100 times) that NAND did not start up correctly
> after warm rebooting, so we end up with various failures or DMA timed out
> due to a stalled BCH. When resetting BCH together with GPMI, the issue
> could not be observed anymore (after 1+ reboots)
PMIC 2.0 require to test return pointer from pmic_get()
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
Cc: Lukasz Majewski
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
Changes in V2:
- Since functions are void type, remove the return value.
board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
On 10/12/12 15:50, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> This patch fix following errors
>
> universal.c: In function 'init_pmic_lcd':
> universal.c:340: warning: implicit declaration of function 'get_pmic'
> universal.c:340: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a
> cast
> universal.c: In fu
On 10/12/12 22:16, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Rajeshwari,
>
>> Resolved the compilation errors for PMIC MAX77686 on SMDK5250.
>> Based on resolve branch of u-boot-samsung.
>>
>> Rajeshwari Shinde (2):
>> POWER: MAX77686: Modified as per the latest Implementation
>> SMDK5250: Enable pmic MAX77
Hi Simon,
I understand your concern.
But currently there is no prints a/f reading/writing/erasing the SPI flash.
User's are unable to confirm whether that particular sf commands are
properly done/not.
Thanks,
Jagan.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 10
Hello Tom,
The following changes since commit fd4d564b3c80b111f18c93adb14233a6a7ddb0e9:
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86 (2012-12-07 08:47:59
-0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-i2c.git master
Andreas Bießmann (1):
soft_i2c:
Hi Scott,
> On 12/10/2012 09:24:32 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > Introduce on-the fly DFU NAND support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
> > ---
> > drivers/dfu/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/dfu/dfu.c | 7 ++
> > drivers/dfu/dfu_nand.c | 194
> > +++
Hi Minkyu,
> PMIC 2.0 require to test return pointer from pmic_get()
>
> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
> Cc: Lukasz Majewski
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> - Since functions are void type, remove the return value.
>
> board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c |6 ++
>
78 matches
Mail list logo
