Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/3] FAT: implement fat_set_blk_dev(), convert cmd_fat.c

2012-10-09 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
Hi Stephen, See my comments inlined below. On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:41:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > This makes the FAT filesystem API more consistent with other > block-based > filesystems. If in the future standard multi-filesystem commands such > as > "ls" or "load" are implemented, hav

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-09 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Albert, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:14:23 -0600, Stephen Warren > wrote: > >> This actually turns out to be less work for custodians if there aren't >> any dependencies between patch series, since whenever you send a pull >>

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-09 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/09/2012 04:19 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:32:08 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 10/09/2012 08:23 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 08:49:00PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-09 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/09/2012 04:59 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:14:23PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 10/09/2012 03:32 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren >>> wrote: On 10/09/2012 08:23 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 08:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] x86: Allow excluding reset handling code from u-boot.

2012-10-09 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Graeme, On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/resetvec.S b/arch/x86/cpu/resetvec.S index 44aee5f..5b359ff 100644 --- a/arch/x86/cpu/resetvec.S +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/re

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-09 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Tom, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:14:23PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 10/09/2012 03:32 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> >> On 10/09/2012 08:23 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> >>> On Sun, O

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] x86: Allow excluding reset handling code from u-boot.

2012-10-09 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Looks good - yes I will prepare a new series to send likely on Thursday. > > Not that it matters for now, but who will define INCLUDE_X86_RESET_VECTOR? It's calculated in the Makefile as an inversion of CONFIG_X86_NO_RESET_VECT

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-09 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/09/2012 05:00 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 10/09/2012 05:14:23 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 10/09/2012 03:32 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> >> On 10/09/2012 08:23 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 08:49:00PM +0200,

Re: [U-Boot] KernelDoc

2012-10-09 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Tom Rini, > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:37:26PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Wolfgang Denk, > > > > > Dear Marek Vasut, > > > > > > In message <201210011107.45164.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > Agreed, not the whole file. But, can you check the rules I tried to > > > > outline? > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/3] FAT: implement fat_set_blk_dev(), convert cmd_fat.c

2012-10-09 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/09/2012 05:06 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > See my comments inlined below. > > On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:41:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> This makes the FAT filesystem API more consistent with other >> block-based >> filesystems. If in the future standard multi-files

Re: [U-Boot] h2200 fails to build on current u-boot/next

2012-10-09 Thread Łukasz Dałek
On 10.10.2012 00:27, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Łukasz, On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:45:33 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:34:13PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Tom, The following changes since commit 661c21dd46e857b74682b0610d83cfea7f3ac3c2: usb.h: Add udc_disconnect protot

[U-Boot] [PATCH] h2200: Make use of default_serial_console

2012-10-09 Thread Lukasz Dalek
Define CONFIG_CONS_INDEX to use ffuart as default console and fix compilation error related to undefined CONFIG_CONS_INDEX. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Dalek --- include/configs/h2200.h |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/h2200.h b/include/configs/h

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-09 Thread Scott Wood
On 10/09/2012 06:25:47 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 10/09/2012 05:00 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 10/09/2012 05:14:23 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> I don't quite follow that; linux-next is also purely merge-based. Are >> you referring to the fact that it's re-created every day, and the >> source

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] h2200: Make use of default_serial_console

2012-10-09 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Lukasz Dalek, > Define CONFIG_CONS_INDEX to use ffuart as default console and fix > compilation error related to undefined CONFIG_CONS_INDEX. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Dalek Acked-by: Marek Vasut > --- > include/configs/h2200.h |1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Enable MMC support for at91sam9x5ek board.

2012-10-09 Thread Josh Wu
Hi, Andreas On 10/10/2012 5:51 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote: Hi Josh, On 09.10.12 12:11, Josh Wu wrote: Hi, Andreas Any feedback of these patches? short answer: no ;) I think they could go into next (no obvious objections), but I would like to do some runtime tests on avr32 before. Beside tha

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 17/32] imximage.cfg: run files through C preprocessor

2012-10-09 Thread Troy Kisky
On 10/8/2012 6:38 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: On 04/10/2012 03:47, Troy Kisky wrote: The '#' used as comments in the files cause the preprocessor trouble, so change to /* */. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky --- Hi Troy, Makefile |3 +- board/esg/ima3-mx53/i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: trats: Power down core 1

2012-10-09 Thread Kyungmin Park
FYI: Piotr and Lukasz are working together for samsung board. Minkyu, can you pick up this patch? Thank you, Kyungmin Park > -Original Message- > From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.b...@aribaud.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 2:07 AM > To: Piotr Wilczek > Cc: u-boot@lists.den

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-09 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Stephen, On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:04:06 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/09/2012 04:19 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Apart from this, I'm not sure why forbidding fast-forward is a good > > thing, but if there are benefits, why not. > > It provides documentation in the git history of when

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] EXYNOS: additional Exynos4 SoC series support

2012-10-09 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Jeong-Hyeon Kim, On 29 August 2012 12:28, wrote: > From: Jeong-Hyeon Kim > > - Fixed MPLL register address > It's different between Exynos4210 and Exynos4412. > > - Added pinmux functions for Exynos4 > > - Added extended gpios for Exynos4412 > Exynos4412 has more gpios than Exynos4210.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 05/21] pmic: Introduce power_board_init() method at ./lib/board.c file

2012-10-09 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Tom, > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:34:35PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: > > On 09/10/2012 12:25, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > [snip] > > >> We use often the "weak" mechanism to avoid that a board > > >> maintainer is constrained to implement an empty function only to > > >> make happy the linker. It

<    1   2