Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

Marek wrote loads of stuff then wrote... > But then, how shall we go about it? Any python gurus around? I wouldn't class myself as a "guru" as that should be a title that is bestowed on you by others but I know a fair amount of Python and might be able to have a go at implementing some of this st

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] dfu:usb: Composite USB download gadget with DFU function

Hi Marek, > Dear Lukasz Majewski, > > > Those patches add support for composite USB download gadget. > > This gadget (at least for now) is equipped with DFU download > > function. > > > > A separate DFU back-end and front-end have been added. > > Back-end is placed at ./drivers/dfu directory. Th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mpc85xx: Initial SP alignment is wrong.

> > > Scott Wood wrote on 2012/07/20 23:11:33: > > > > On 07/20/2012 04:20 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > PowerPC mandates SP to be 16 bytes aligned. > > > Furthermore, a stack frame is added, pointing to the reset vector > > > which is just get in the way when gdb is walking the stack because

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] integrator: break out common config

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Linus Walleij > wrote: > >> The configuration that is common for all Integrator boards may >> just as well be stored in a common include file as per pattern >> from other boards. This eases maintenance quite

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] dfu:usb: Composite USB download gadget with DFU function

Dear Lukasz Majewski, > Hi Marek, > > > Dear Lukasz Majewski, > > > > > Those patches add support for composite USB download gadget. > > > This gadget (at least for now) is equipped with DFU download > > > function. > > > > > > A separate DFU back-end and front-end have been added. > > > Back-e

Re: [U-Boot] Uboot and initramfs

On 7/15/2012 12:19 PM, Wojtek wrote: Hi, I'm struggling with the topic for long two days and I want to ask for help. I have a DNS-320 system with u-boot. I compiled kernel and it works well, but I need initramfs. I prepared contents on this system (ARM) (no need to cross-compile), then did: fi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] ehci-hcd: Boost transfer speed

Am 20.07.2012 17:35, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau: On Friday 20 July 2012 17:15:13 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: Am 20.07.2012 17:03, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau: On Friday 20 July 2012 16:51:33 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: Am 20.07.2012 15:56, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau: Dear Marek Vasut, On Fri

Re: [U-Boot] Sparc build warnings

On Sunday 22 July 2012 17:29:49 Peter Tyser wrote: > Most the the warnings look pretty trivial to fix, so I could gin > something up, but I don't have a Sparc toolchain to actually test any > modifications. http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/u-boot/sparc.tar.xz -mike signature.asc Description: This i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] common.h: Introduce DEFINE_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 01:22:40PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 20 July 2012 17:50:33 Tom Rini wrote: > > On 07/20/2012 02:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Friday 20 July 2012 07:31:47 Marek Vasut wrote: > > >> Dear Mike Frysinger, > > >> > > >>> On Saturday 07 July 2012 23:08:14

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] dfu:usb: Support for g_dnl composite download gadget.

Dear Mike Frysinger, Thank you for thorough review. > On Tuesday 03 July 2012 05:38:05 Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/g_dnl.c > > > > +static const char shortname[] = "usb_dnl_"; > > shortname -> gadget_name_prefix This might be only matter of taste, but i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] dfu:cmd: Support for DFU u-boot command

Dear Mike, > On Tuesday 03 July 2012 05:38:09 Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/common/cmd_dfu.c > > > > +int do_dfu(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const > > argv[]) > > static It can be static (static int do_dfu). On the other hand the U_BOOT_CMD macro defines: i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] dfu: DFU backend implementation

Dear Mike Frysinger, > On Tuesday 03 July 2012 05:38:07 Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > + puts("UPLOAD ... done\n"); > > + puts("Ctrl+C to exit ...\n"); > > combine into a single puts() ? Ok, will be done > > > +static int dfu_fill_entity(struct dfu_entity *dfu, char* s, int > > a

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 03:27:30AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:21:40AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > And Jenkins... well, we have been using this for some time internally > > > to run test builds for U-Boot. I can tell you a

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:28:45PM +1000, Graeme Russ wrote: [snip] > I don't think a protracted 'tool x' doesn't do this and 'tool y' doesn't do > that is going to get us anywhere. Agreed, even if I did just reply to Marek :) > What we need to do is define exactly what we want out of the patch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mpc85xx: Initial SP alignment is wrong.

On 07/21/2012 10:06 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Scott Wood wrote on 2012/07/20 23:11:33: >> >> On 07/20/2012 04:20 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>> PowerPC mandates SP to be 16 bytes aligned. >>> Furthermore, a stack frame is added, pointing to the reset vector >>> which is just get in the way

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] ehci-hcd: Boost transfer speed

On Monday 23 July 2012 15:35:25 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: > Am 20.07.2012 17:35, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau: > > On Friday 20 July 2012 17:15:13 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: > >> Am 20.07.2012 17:03, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau: > >>> On Friday 20 July 2012 16:51:33 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mpc85xx: Initial SP alignment is wrong.

Scott Wood wrote on 2012/07/23 18:52:28: > From: Scott Wood > To: Joakim Tjernlund , > Cc: > Date: 2012/07/23 18:52 > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mpc85xx: Initial SP alignment is wrong. > > On 07/21/2012 10:06 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > Scott Wood wrote on 2012/07/20 23:11:33:

Re: [U-Boot] Sparc build warnings

Dear Mike Frysinger, > On Sunday 22 July 2012 17:29:49 Peter Tyser wrote: > > Most the the warnings look pretty trivial to fix, so I could gin > > something up, but I don't have a Sparc toolchain to actually test any > > modifications. > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/u-boot/sparc.tar.xz > -mike

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

Dear Tom Rini, > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 03:27:30AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:21:40AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > And Jenkins... well, we have been using this for some time internally > > > > to run test bu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mpc85xx: Initial SP alignment is wrong.

On 07/23/2012 12:11 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > Scott Wood wrote on 2012/07/23 18:52:28: > >> From: Scott Wood >> To: Joakim Tjernlund , >> Cc: >> Date: 2012/07/23 18:52 >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mpc85xx: Initial SP alignment is wrong. >> >> On 07/21/2012 10:06 AM, Joakim Tje

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

On 07/23/2012 10:17 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Tom Rini, On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 03:27:30AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Tom Rini, On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:21:40AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: [snip] And Jenkins... well, we have been using this for some time internally to run test bui

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] net: fec_mxc: Fix setting of RCR for xMII

Hi Andy, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 04:11:22AM, Duan Fugang-B38611 wrote: > With flow control (FCE) feature, it depends on the hardware support. > I.MX serial Ethernet ip (FEC, enet) can support the features, and it > don't need to enable flow control in 100Mbps transition in fact. > As our test resu

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

Dear Tom Rini, > On 07/23/2012 10:17 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > >> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 03:27:30AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> Dear Tom Rini, > >>> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:21:40AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > [snip] > > > And Jenkins.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/2] Add env vars describing U-Boot target board

On 07/12/2012 12:10 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Joe Hershberger, > > In message > you > wrote: >> It also breaks a number of ARM boards... LOG/at91sam9263ek_norflash_boot.ERR:3:/home/joe/u-boot/include/config.h:5:0: warning: "CONFIG_SYS_BOARD" redefined [enabled by defau

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ext2fs: fix warning: 'blocknxt' may be used uninitialized

On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 10:55:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kim Phillips, > > In message <20120703174156.a1082309c2b205216606a...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > This warning was introduced in 436da3c "ext2load: increase read > > speed": > > > > ext2fs.c: In function 'ext2fs_read_file': >

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

On 07/23/2012 11:11 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > >> On 07/23/2012 10:17 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> Dear Tom Rini, >>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 03:27:30AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:21:40AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] Invalid Netconsole source MAC address [was: Re: [STATUS] v2012.07-rc1 is out - release date July 23]

Hi Michael, On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Michael Walle wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am Dienstag 10 Juli 2012, 09:31:42 schrieb Wolfgang Denk: >> > Hi everybody, >> > >> > this is to let you know that the v2012.07-rc1 prerelease is out. >> > >> > Please help testing, so we can fix the remaining issues

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/2] Add env vars describing U-Boot target board

Dear Tom, In message <5fbf8e85ca34454794f0f7ecba79798f379d86f...@hqmail04.nvidia.com> you wrote: > > > > I had the same problem. In my case it happenend when I ran an > > > out-of-tree build from a directory in which I had run an in-tree build > > > before. Running "make mrproper" in the repos

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 11/19] tegra: Add LCD support to Nvidia boards

On 07/10/2012 10:58 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Stephen Warren > wrote: > > On 06/13/2012 10:19 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Add calls to the LCD driver from Nvidia board code. > > > diff --git a/board/nvidia/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/10] dm: Move OMAP GPIO driver to drivers/gpio/

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 05:02:23PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: Albert Aribaud > Cc: U-Boot DM > Cc: Tom Rini Acked-by: Tom Rini -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/10] dm: Select CONFIG_SPL_GPIO_SUPPORT on OMAP

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 05:02:27PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > This fixes the breakage with SPL on most OMAP boards after the GPIO > driver was moved. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: Albert Aribaud > Cc: U-Boot DM > Cc: Tom Rini The change is fine so Acked-by: Tom

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 00/15] split tegra20 arm7 code into separate SPL

Tegra devs, Since I've not seen any objections (or discussion, really, beyond Simon/Allen), I'm going to apply u-boot-tegra/next to tegra/master (i.e. the SPL patches will now be de rigueur for u-boot-tegra going forward). If you have Tegra patches that you are working on, or are in the middle

Re: [U-Boot] Invalid Netconsole source MAC address [was: Re: [STATUS] v2012.07-rc1 is out - release date July 23]

Hi Joe, Am Montag 23 Juli 2012, 21:30:28 schrieb Joe Hershberger: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Michael Walle wrote: > > Mh i guess NetLoop isn't called and thus NetOurEther is never > > initialized. Similar issue like > > d7310c7e63ca9ffd42527dc9735cb505cbe908b7. Initializing NetOurEther i

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:40:27PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: [snip] > The other problem is how to find the boards that actually need rebuild on per- > patch basis. And for generic patches, we'll need to do MAKEALL across all > architectures anyway, which takes a bit of time. I think we (custodia

[U-Boot] [PATCHv2 1/2] mpc85xx: Initial SP alignment is wrong.

PowerPC mandates SP to be 16 bytes aligned. Furthermore, a stack frame is added, pointing to the reset vector which may in the way when gdb is walking the stack because the reset vector may not accessible depending on emulator settings. Also use a temp register so gdb doesn't pick up intermediate v

[U-Boot] [PATCHv2 2/2] powerpc: Stack Pointer not properly aligned

The code first aligns the SP to 16 then subtract 8, making it 8 bytes aligned. Furthermore the initial stack frame not quite correct either. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund --- v2 - Address Scott Wood's comments arch/powerpc/lib/board.c |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deleti

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mpc85xx: Initial SP alignment is wrong.

Scott Wood wrote on 2012/07/23 19:28:20: > > On 07/23/2012 12:11 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > ...but I was a bit confused when I thought it would help terminate > things. The NULL LR only helps prevent finding something worse, if > something happens to do a backtrace immediately after

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:20:15AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201207230347.31993.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > > Yes, I know. Hmmm, maybe if every 24 hours the auto build infrastructure: > > > - Runs a MAKEALL on the mainline repo (if any patches have been

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/10] dm: Select CONFIG_SPL_GPIO_SUPPORT on OMAP

Dear Tom Rini, > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 05:02:27PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > This fixes the breakage with SPL on most OMAP boards after the GPIO > > driver was moved. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > > Cc: Albert Aribaud > > Cc: U-Boot DM > > Cc: Tom Rini > >

Re: [U-Boot] Invalid Netconsole source MAC address [was: Re: [STATUS] v2012.07-rc1 is out - release date July 23]

Hi Michael, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Michael Walle wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > Am Montag 23 Juli 2012, 21:30:28 schrieb Joe Hershberger: >> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Michael Walle wrote: >> > Mh i guess NetLoop isn't called and thus NetOurEther is never >> > initialized. Similar issue

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

Dear Tom Rini, > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:40:27PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > [snip] > > > The other problem is how to find the boards that actually need rebuild on > > per- patch basis. And for generic patches, we'll need to do MAKEALL > > across all architectures anyway, which takes a bit

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

Dear Tom Rini, > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:20:15AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Marek Vasut, > > > > In message <201207230347.31993.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > Yes, I know. Hmmm, maybe if every 24 hours the auto build infrastructure: > > > > - Runs a MAKEALL on the mainline repo

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

Dear Tom Rini, > On 07/23/2012 11:11 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > >> On 07/23/2012 10:17 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> Dear Tom Rini, > >>> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 03:27:30AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:21

Re: [U-Boot] Antwort: Re: NetConsole & TFTP

Hi Thomas, On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Thomas Pohl wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > >>Hm... you are not running mainline code, right? Because we always >>have a single network interface active at any time. > > I am using mainline code (u-boot v2011.12) with > P2020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH_config. Unfortuna

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

Dear Eric Nelson, > > Yea ... I think our community is kinda broken :-( > > Hey. We heard that... > > Careful what you say on an open mic! Oh man ... I guess it sounded bad indeed, I should have though about the wording more, sorry. I mean, we messed up the management (and I wonder who'll st

[U-Boot] [PATCH] net: Make sure the ethaddr is updated in net_init()

NetConsole may call NetSendUDPPacket before NetLoop is called. This will cause the source MAC address (NetOurEther) to be wrong. Instead of only changing it in NetLoop, move it to NetLoopInit so that it is also updated when net_init() is called (especially by nc_start()). Signed-off-by: Joe Hers

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: Make sure the ethaddr is updated in net_init()

Hi Michael, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote: > NetConsole may call NetSendUDPPacket before NetLoop is called. This > will cause the source MAC address (NetOurEther) to be wrong. Instead > of only changing it in NetLoop, move it to NetLoopInit so that it is > also updated

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

On 07/23/2012 04:06 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Eric Nelson, Yea ... I think our community is kinda broken :-( Hey. We heard that... Careful what you say on an open mic! Oh man ... I guess it sounded bad indeed, I should have though about the wording more, sorry. I mean, we messed up the

[U-Boot] RFC - PatchTrack Specification

Hi All, Here's a quick-and-dirty specification for a patch tracking tool... PatchTrack is designed to help alleviate some of the load from custodians manging a email based work flow accepting patches from a large community of contributors Functionality: - Monitor an electronic mailing list, ext

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] net: sh_eth: clean up for the SH7757's code

Hi, Thank you for the reply. I will wait until it is merged. Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda 2012/07/23 15:27, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Hi, > > Perhaps, your patch already are in Joe' patch queue, I think. > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/167486/ > > Nobuhiro > > 2012/7/23 Shimoda, Yos

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sh: modify checkcpu() for SH-4A

Even if using CPU is SH-4A, the previous code always put "SH4". This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda --- arch/sh/cpu/sh4/cpu.c |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/cpu/sh4/cpu.c b/arch/sh/cpu/sh4/cpu.c index f136758..7da1ef7 100644

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: rmobile: kzm9g: Fix CONFIG_BAUDRATE setting

Hi, Applied to rmobile branch. Best regards, Nobuhiro 2012/7/20 Tetsuyuki Kobayshi : > From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi > > The value of CONFIG_BAUDRATE is treated as string and put as initial value of > environment variable. If it begin with '(', it is wrongly parsed to 0 in > number. So I remove

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sh: modify checkcpu() for SH-4A

Applied, thanks. Best regards, Nobuhiro 2012/7/24 Shimoda, Yoshihiro : > Even if using CPU is SH-4A, the previous code always put "SH4". > This patch fixes it. > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda > --- > arch/sh/cpu/sh4/cpu.c |4 > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >

Re: [U-Boot] [V2 14/15] S3C64XX: Move s3c6400.h to cpu.h to support s3c6410 board

Dear Zhong Hongbo, On 14 July 2012 01:11, Zhong Hongbo wrote: > From: Zhong Hongbo > > Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo > --- > Change for V2: > - New. > --- > arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/pwm.c |2 +- > arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/reset.S|2 +- > arch/arm/cpu/arm1

Re: [U-Boot] RFC - PatchTrack Specification

Dear Graeme Russ, > Hi All, > > Here's a quick-and-dirty specification for a patch tracking tool... And here comes our RMK of U-Boot world, the philosopher ;-) > PatchTrack is designed to help alleviate some of the load from custodians > manging a email based work flow accepting patches from a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ext2fs: fix warning: 'blocknxt' may be used uninitialized

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:56:00AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 10:55:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Kim Phillips, > > > > In message <20120703174156.a1082309c2b205216606a...@freescale.com> you > > wrote: > > > This warning was introduced in 436da3c "ext2load: incre

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/10] dm: tegra: Staticize local functions in usb.c

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Simon Glass > Cc: Tom Warren > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: Albert Aribaud > Cc: U-Boot DM Ooops. Acked-by: Simon Glass > --- > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/usb.c |7 --- > 1 file changed, 4 insertion

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/10] dm: tegra: Staticize local functions in usb.c

Dear Simon Glass, > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > > Cc: Simon Glass > > Cc: Tom Warren > > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > > Cc: Albert Aribaud > > Cc: U-Boot DM > > Acked-by: Simon Glass Simon, can you please pick up this one separatelly throug