Dear Tom Rini, > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:40:27PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > [snip] > > > The other problem is how to find the boards that actually need rebuild on > > per- patch basis. And for generic patches, we'll need to do MAKEALL > > across all architectures anyway, which takes a bit of time. > > I think we (custodians) need to define representative sets. For TI > stuff, you don't need to hit every omap3 board, but just a handful to be > good enough. And while my PowerPC is rusty, I know we don't need to > build as many combinations of boards as we do to be happy in an > every-patch build (just nightly / once there's changes live on wd's > master branch would be the world).
Good idea ... USB is generally properly isolated part, yet it can impact crazy boards, like MPC83xx (well, I still have my shallow grave around, which I left just by WD's sheer grace ;-) ). Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
