Dear Albert,
On 8 March 2012 16:29, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 08/03/2012 08:20, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>
> Hi Albert,
>
>> Which means there are commmits on these repo's master branches that are
>> not currently in u-boot-arm.
>>
>> Are there any ARM pull requests pending that I woul
Dear Lei Wen,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > I wonder which benefits we get for this price we are paying?
>
> The main reason I'd like to introduce this upgrade is for I want to
> add the compressing
> feature for uboot.
This should be make optional code, including any extensions /
additional fu
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > 01/10 Simon Glass[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/8] sandbox: Add > basic
> > command line parsing
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/122324
>
> Mike expanded this one significantly - I just acked it. Might stretch
> the defin
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Lei Wen,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> > I wonder which benefits we get for this price we are paying?
>>
>> The main reason I'd like to introduce this upgrade is for I want to
>> add the compressing
>> feature for u
Dear Andy,
In message
you wrote:
>
> One of my coworkers is seeing these errors with gcc-4.3.74 (eglibc-2.8.74-6):
glibc version should be completely irrelevant when building U-Boot.
>
> Configuring for TQM8548_BE - Board: TQM85xx, Options:
> MPC8548,TQM8548_BE=y,HOSTNAME=tqm8548,BOARDNAME="
Dear Lei Wen,
In message
you wrote:
>
> >> And the 1.2.6 has some fix for the deflate, so it
> >> is maybe a good
> >> base line for introducing it.
> >
> > Which exact fix are you referring to?
>
> I am referring to the zlib 1.2.5->1.2.6 changelog:
> Added deflatePending() to return the amount
>> I've been comparing the linux and u-boot implementations, and it looks
>> like the following fix is in the kernel
>> but not in u-boot. I don't really understand it, but it looks like a
>> candidate. Might porting this change to
>> u-boot fix the issue?
>
> Hard to tell. Might be worth a try,
Hi Alex,
On Thursday 08 March 2012 10:49:33 Alex Zeffertt wrote:
> >> I've been comparing the linux and u-boot implementations, and it looks
> >> like the following fix is in the kernel
> >> but not in u-boot. I don't really understand it, but it looks like a
> >> candidate. Might porting this c
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 2 March 2012 22:25, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Add exynos4_dmc structure in dmc.h for exynos4 dram controllor(DMC).
>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/dmc.h | 109
>
> 1 files changed, 109 inserti
When defined CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE, there will be some
compilation errors:
./common/env_nowhere.o: In function `env_relocate_spec':
./common/env_nowhere.c:38: multiple definition of `env_relocate_spec'
./common/env_flash.o: ./common/env_flash.c:326: first defined here
./common/env_nowhere.o: In fu
Rewrite this struct for the support of two ports and two message
units registers.
Signed-off-by: Liu Gang
---
Changes in v2:
- Change the subject and commit message.
- Remove the offsets in the comments.
- Rewrite the struct for the support of two ports
and two message units registers.
Cha
This document describes the implementation of the boot from SRIO,
includes the introduction of envionment, an example based on P4080DS
platform, an example of the slave's RCW, and the description about
how to use this feature.
Signed-off-by: Liu Gang
---
Changes in v2:
- Subject changed to "powe
For the powerpc processors with SRIO interface, boot location can be configured
from SRIO1 or SRIO2 by RCW. The processor booting from SRIO can do without flash
for u-boot image. The image can be fetched from another processor's memory
space by SRIO link connected between them.
The processor boots
When boot from SRIO, slave's core can be in holdoff after powered on for
some specific requirements. Master can release the slave's core at the
right time by SRIO interface.
Master needs to:
1. Set outbound SRIO windows in order to configure slave's registers
for the core's rele
For the powerpc processors with SRIO interface, boot location can be configured
from SRIO1 or SRIO2 by RCW. The processor booting from SRIO can do without flash
for u-boot image. The image can be fetched from another processor's memory
space by SRIO link connected between them.
The processor boots
When boot from SRIO, slave's ucode can be stored in master's memory space,
then slave can fetch the ucode image through SRIO interface. For the
corenet platform, ucode is for Fman.
Master needs to:
1. Put the slave's ucode image into it's own memory space.
2. Set an inbound SRIO wi
When boot from SRIO, slave's ENV can be stored in master's memory space,
then slave can fetch the ENV through SRIO interface.
NOTE: Because the slave can not erase, write master's NOR flash by SRIO
interface, so it can not modify the ENV parameters stored in
master's NOR flash
Hello everybody,
I'm more than happy to be able to announce that we have found a number
of new custodians who will help to further distribute the work and
especially to reduce the backlog of unprocessed patches:
Here is the lst of new custodians:
- AVR32:Andreas Bießmann
- Netwo
Dear Joe,
In message
you wrote:
>
> I'm guessing you lost my email from yesterday (filter again?)...
Misplaced, not lost. And I found out which of my filter rules was a
bit too generic (ber...@gmail.com). Should be fixed now.
> My boss is not preventing me from accepting... so I accept. I e
Hi i am charles.
I am building the panda uboot image, but something wrong.
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/charles/Work_100G/PandaBoard/U_boot/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/armv7'
make -C tools all
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/charles/Work_100G/PandaBoard/U_boot/u-boot/tools'
make[1]: Leaving direc
Dear Albert,
The following changes since commit 32ec258f829808dd7cf74fd83ba999fdaaeab715:
IXP: Fix GPIO_INT_ACT_LOW_SET() (2012-03-08 08:11:45 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master
Chander Kashyap (1):
EXYNOS: Add structure for Exynos4
Hi Marek,
On Thursday 08 March 2012 03:36 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear puneets,
Hi Mike,
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 08:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Monday 05 March 2012 09:46:21 Puneet Saxena wrote:
As DMA expects the buffers to be equal and larger then
cache
Hi,
I was just thinking if this year's Libre Software Meeting (LSM - from
7th to 12th July in Geneva, Switzerland) would be a suitable event to
arrange a meeting of some U-Boot developers?
See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.embedded/3900 or
http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/CfP-13th-
Hi Charles,
On Thursday 08 March 2012 04:48 PM, charlesKAO wrote:
Hi i am charles.
I am building the panda uboot image, but something wrong.
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/charles/Work_100G/PandaBoard/U_boot/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/armv7'
make -C tools all
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/cha
Fix the warning
mmc.c: In function 'mmc_send_cmd':
mmc.c:87: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
in case CONFIG_MMC_TRACE is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme
CC: Andy Fleming
---
drivers/mmc/mmc.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drive
This patch imports three patches from the Freescale U-Boot with the following
commit messages:
ENGR00156405 ESDHC: Add workaround for auto-clock gate errata ENGcm03648
http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/uboot-imx.git/commit/drivers/mmc/imx_esdhc.c?h=imx_v2009.08_12.01.01&id=e436525a70fe4762
Dear puneets,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Thursday 08 March 2012 03:36 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear puneets,
> >
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 06 March 2012 08:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >>>
> >>> On Monday 05 March 2012 09:46:21 Puneet Saxena wrote:
> >
Dear Simon Glass,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Fix the crash when running several times usb_init() with a USB ethernet
> >> device plugged.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin
> >> Tested-by: Wolfgang Grandegger
> >> ---
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > w
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
---
include/configs/zipitz2.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/zipitz2.h b/include/configs/zipitz2.h
index 26204af..e14f59a 100644
--- a/include/configs/zipitz2.h
+++ b/include/configs/zipitz2.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
Dear Marek Vasut,
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> ---
> include/configs/zipitz2.h |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/configs/zipitz2.h b/include/configs/zipitz2.h
> index 26204af..e14f59a 100644
> --- a/include/configs/zipitz2.h
> +++ b/include/
Albert,
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.b...@aribaud.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:20 AM
> To: U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Reinhard Meyer; Stefano Babic; Marek Vasut; Minkyu Kang; Tom Warren
> Subject: Any outstanding ARM pull requests?
>
> Hi all,
>
On 03/08/2012 01:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On my working repo where I have all ARM subrepos as remotes, a
>
> git branch -r --no-merged | grep '/master'
>
> with HEAD set to my master branch gives the following:
>
> u-boot-atmel/master
> u-boot-atmel/master-arm
> u-b
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Andy,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> One of my coworkers is seeing these errors with gcc-4.3.74 (eglibc-2.8.74-6):
>
> glibc version should be completely irrelevant when building U-Boot.
Yeah, I only mentioned it because it was
On 7 March 2012 14:42, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
> Hi u-booters,
>
> I have a short script in my u-boot environment which chooses which of
> two ubifs partitions to boot
> by attempting to read a release file in each one.
>
> Unfortunately, after an unclean shutdown sometimes the ubifsmount
> fails. (
On 03/07/2012 07:56 PM, Bud Miljkovic wrote:
> Does someone know how to enable the nand createbbt u-boot command?
The BBT gets created automatically if it does not exist, provided the
NAND controller driver asks for it. Why do you need an explicit command?
-Scott
___
This will add ARM specific over-rides for the defines
from linux/linkage.h
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
Not adding the defines for __ALIGN and __ALIGN_STR
because it's not clear why alignment is set to 0
(single byte alignment).
Creates a checkpatch error that can not be avoided
Changes in v4:
-
Use ENTRY and ENDPROC with assembly functions to ensure
necessary assembler directives for all functions.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
Changes in v4:
- None
Changes in v3:
- None
Changes in V2:
- Newly added
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S |5 ++-
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/l
Enable -march=armv7-a for armv7 platforms if the tool-chain
supports it. This in turn results in Thumb-2 code generated
for these platforms if CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
I believe armv7-a is fine for all the SoCs except Tegra2
and I see that Tegra2 is already m
Enable Thumb build and ARM-Thumb interworking based on the new
config flag CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
Changes in v4:
- Use ':=' instead of '+=' when computed make variables
are involved
Changes in v3:
- None
Changes from V1 to V2:
- None
Changes from RFC to V1:
- Fixe
Avoid using __attribute__ ((__packed__)) unless it's
absolutely necessary. "packed" will remove alignment
requirements for the respective objects and may cause
alignment issues unless alignment is also enforced
using a pragma.
Here, these packed attributes were causing alignment
faults in Thumb bu
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
Changes in v4:
- None
Changes in v3:
- None
Changes from V1 to V2:
- None
Changes from RFC to V1:
- None
---
include/configs/omap4_common.h |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/omap4_common.h b/include/configs/oma
Missed adding 'v4' in the subject. Please ignore this series. Will
re-send correcting the subject.
On Thursday 08 March 2012 10:40 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
This will add ARM specific over-rides for the defines
from linux/linkage.h
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
Not adding the defines for __ALIGN and __
Thumb is an alternate instruction set available in many
ARM processors. Below is a detailed description from ARM
specs:
"The Thumb instruction set is a re-encoded subset of the
ARM instruction set. Thumb instructions execute in their
own processor state, with the architecture defining the
mechanis
This will add ARM specific over-rides for the defines
from linux/linkage.h
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
Not adding the defines for __ALIGN and __ALIGN_STR
because it's not clear why alignment is set to 0
(single byte alignment).
Creates a checkpatch error that can not be avoided
Changes in v4:
-
Use ENTRY and ENDPROC with assembly functions to ensure
necessary assembler directives for all functions.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
Changes in v4:
- None
Changes in v3:
- None
Changes in V2:
- Newly added
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S |5 ++-
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/l
Enable Thumb build and ARM-Thumb interworking based on the new
config flag CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
Changes in v4:
- Use ':=' instead of '+=' when computed make variables
are involved
Changes in v3:
- None
Changes from V1 to V2:
- None
Changes from RFC to V1:
- Fixe
Enable -march=armv7-a for armv7 platforms if the tool-chain
supports it. This in turn results in Thumb-2 code generated
for these platforms if CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
I believe armv7-a is fine for all the SoCs except Tegra2
and I see that Tegra2 is already m
Avoid using __attribute__ ((__packed__)) unless it's
absolutely necessary. "packed" will remove alignment
requirements for the respective objects and may cause
alignment issues unless alignment is also enforced
using a pragma.
Here, these packed attributes were causing alignment
faults in Thumb bu
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
Changes in v4:
- None
Changes in v3:
- None
Changes from V1 to V2:
- None
Changes from RFC to V1:
- None
---
include/configs/omap4_common.h |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/omap4_common.h b/include/configs/oma
On 01/06/2012 05:51 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Doug Anderson
>
> This works together with a kernel change that looks at the scratchpad
> register to determine which of the many UARTs it should use for early
> printing:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg154633.html
>
> While
Dear Alex,
In message
you wrote:
>
> I've now managed to repro this problem and add some debug. It looks
> like u-boot is simply running out of memory whilst trying to mount a
> filesystem that "needs recovery". (Error -12 is -ENOMEM.) The
> partition it is mounting is 240MB, but only about 4
Dear Stephen Warren,
In message <4f58f5b8.6070...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>
> I noticed this patch isn't applied yet that I can find. Are there any
> comments on it; can it be applied? Thanks.
>
> For reference, it's in patchwork at:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/134712/
>
> > ---
> > dr
On 03/08/2012 11:39 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
>
> In message <4f58f5b8.6070...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>>
>> I noticed this patch isn't applied yet that I can find. Are there any
>> comments on it; can it be applied? Thanks.
>>
>> For reference, it's in patchwork at:
>> htt
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 5:54 a.m.
> To: Bud Miljkovic
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Enabling nand createbbt command
>
> The BBT gets created automatically if it does not exist, provided the
>
On 03/08/2012 01:38 PM, Bud Miljkovic wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 5:54 a.m.
>> To: Bud Miljkovic
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Enabling nand createbbt command
>>
>> The BBT gets create
Albert,
Please pull u-boot-tegra/master into arm master. Thanks!
The following changes since commit 32ec258f829808dd7cf74fd83ba999fdaaeab715:
IXP: Fix GPIO_INT_ACT_LOW_SET() (2012-03-08 08:11:45 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-tegra master
Simon Glas
Hi Tom,
Le 08/03/2012 17:02, Tom Warren a écrit :
What's the cut-off? i.e. could I push it to tomorrow if I run across a problem
in testing?
No hurry. Wolfgang's pushed the deadline. :)
(and yes, I saw the pull req and the subsequent hold request)
Thanks,
Tom
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
__
On 03/08/2012 03:01 PM, Bud Miljkovic wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 9:02 a.m.
>> To: Bud Miljkovic
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Enabling nand createbbt command
>>
>>
>> It should hap
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 10:09 a.m.
> To: Bud Miljkovic
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Enabling nand createbbt command
>
> Please use a recent upstream U-Boot, or contact supp...@freescale.co
Dear Stephen,
In message <4f590b25.8090...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>
> > I don't like to see such highly architecture specific stuff in common
> > code, especially if it's such a dirty hack like this.
>
> Are there any hooks where we can do the same thing in SoC-specific code?
Not without addi
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Bud Miljkovic wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 10:09 a.m.
>> To: Bud Miljkovic
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Enabling nand createbbt command
>>
>> Pleas
On 03/08/2012 02:29 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stephen,
>
> In message <4f590b25.8090...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>>
>>> I don't like to see such highly architecture specific stuff in common
>>> code, especially if it's such a dirty hack like this.
>>
>> Are there any hooks where we can do t
From: Fabio Estevam
> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 10:42 a.m.
> To: Bud Miljkovic
> Cc: Scott Wood
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Enabling nand createbbt command
> >
> > I took the what was linked at the SABRE Automotive Infotainment
> > board Freescale page in January and applied all provided patches. I
Users expect the final build result to be u-boot.bin. Preserve this
expectation even when CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE is enabled.
If the user wants to append a custom DTB rather than the one the U-Boot
build process creates, they can append it to u-boot-nofdt.bin.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
---
This p
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Bud Miljkovic wrote:
> Could you elaborate this point?
My suggestion is that you use U-boot from git.denx.de instead of the
2009.08 from FSL.
>
>>
>> Please note you would need to add mx53 support to
>> drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c though.
>
> Any hints how I do th
From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 11:45 a.m.
> > To: Bud Miljkovic
> > Cc: Scott Wood; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Enabling nand createbbt command
> >
> >
> > My suggestion is that you use U-boot from git.denx.de instead of the
> > 200
On 03/08/2012 04:49 PM, Bud Miljkovic wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 11:45 a.m.
>> To: Bud Miljkovic
>> Cc: Scott Wood; u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Enabling nand createbbt command
>>
>>
>>
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Bud Miljkovic wrote:
> Is that because the mainline U-boot id better maintained and/or ... ?
Correct.
In case you are interested in adding mx53 nand support into mainline
U-boot, this FSL patch can be helpful as a reference:
http://opensource.freescale.com/git?p=
Hi Stephen, Wolfgang,
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 02:29 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Stephen,
>>
>> In message <4f590b25.8090...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>>>
I don't like to see such highly architecture specific stuff in common
code, especi
Thank you Scott and Fabio,
You help is much appreciated.
I will try to add the nand support for mx53 mainline.
However, what I am trying to do is to build a u-boot that supports NAND
and have YAFFS2 as well and at moment I use the mx53_ard board since
this is very close to what my custom board w
When there is not device tree file available to U-Boot, we panic.
Implement board_pre_console_putc() so that this panic will be displayed
on the serial console.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/board.c | 58 +
1 files changed, 58 inse
This is used to display panic messages before the console is active.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
include/configs/tegra2-common.h |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/tegra2-common.h b/include/configs/tegra2-common.h
index e6f385f..6ce
+Jerry
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Users expect the final build result to be u-boot.bin. Preserve this
> expectation even when CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE is enabled.
>
> If the user wants to append a custom DTB rather than the one the U-Boot
> build process create
On Thursday 08 March 2012 21:52:56 Simon Glass wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/board.c
>
> +static u32 uart_reg_addr[] = {
const
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
On Thursday 08 March 2012 01:37:08 Simon Glass wrote:
> Yes I just cleaned up mine...it would be nice if you could select
> multiple patches at the top level and perform actions on them.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ldopaogbegnhconlboidfjcmidndkbeg
-mike
signature.asc
Description: T
On Wednesday 07 March 2012 06:25:15 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> So should this not go into the upcoming release? I would expect it should.
ok, i can put together a branch for you to pull
> Yes - I find this still to be way more efficient that working with
> the slow web interface of PW, and JK still
Hi Marek,
On Thursday 08 March 2012 07:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear puneets,
Hi Marek,
On Thursday 08 March 2012 03:36 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear puneets,
Hi Mike,
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 08:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Monday 05 March 2012 09:46:21
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:40:36PM -0700, matt.wad...@linaro.org wrote:
>From: Matt Waddel
>
>Added get_ticks() and get_tbclk() routines
Hi Matt waddel,
I have posted the fix before:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/142477/
Liming Wang
>
>Signed-off-by: Matt Waddel
>---
> board/armltd/vexpress
Hello Stefan,
We already talked about this off list. I think it makes much sense to install
an SPEAr U-Boot custodian, to offload Albert a bit. As I understand there are
more SPEAr patches to be seen soon. And I also have some waiting here (SPL
support etc).
So who would be best suited to becom
Hi Vipin,
On Friday 09 March 2012 08:29:10 Vipin Kumar wrote:
> > So who would be best suited to become SPEAr custodian? Amit, you
> > yourself? Or Vipin Kumar, as he is currently listed as maintainer for
> > the SPEAr eval boards?
>
> Yes, I can become a custodian on denx. Well, in that case all
80 matches
Mail list logo
