Hi Jerry,
Thanks for the information.
Please find my understanding about dts:
1. I will have to create board specific *.dts file.
2. Need to download latest dtc compiler.
3. Compile dts file using dtc compiler which will generate *.dtb file
4. Enable following macros in u-boot code
#define CONFI
Hello,
I got a KAMIO-1251 board equipped with a MIPS AU1250 CPU. I would
like to build U-BOOT for that board, is it possible?
regards,
--
Frédéric
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear Peter Pan,
please don't top-post / full quote. And make sure never to post HTML
again!
In message <48abf2c20911292253q4850af1dy1767fdd9e3456...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
> --0016368319a25758030479911a75
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I assumed that the stack does not s
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 27/11/2009 21:18:28:
> I am not convinced yet that the new code is actually an improvement.
> Changing the array of pointers into a list of function calls does not
> solve any of the real issues we have with the init seuqnece - like
> that some board need the PCI initializat
hi,
drivers/power/twl4030.c has a twl4030_power_init() function which is
called by most (all?) OMAP3 boards. What it does is enabling VAUX3,
VPLL2 and VDAC power supplies in TWL4030/TPS659x0 chip. However they
are all very board specific and in most cases not needed at all, at
least for booting th
Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> hi,
>
> drivers/power/twl4030.c has a twl4030_power_init() function which is
> called by most (all?) OMAP3 boards. What it does is enabling VAUX3,
> VPLL2 and VDAC power supplies in TWL4030/TPS659x0 chip. However they
> are all very board specific and in most cases not n
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Tom wrote:
> Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> drivers/power/twl4030.c has a twl4030_power_init() function which is
>> called by most (all?) OMAP3 boards. What it does is enabling VAUX3,
>> VPLL2 and VDAC power supplies in TWL4030/TPS659x0 chip. However they
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom [mailto:tom@windriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 9:34 PM
> To: Hiremath, Vaibhav
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] Added configuration file for
> AM3517EVM
>
> Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> >>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:38:02AM +, Nick Thompson wrote:
> > Ideally a high-level driver like fsl_elbc_nand wouldn't have to implement
> > cmdfunc at all.
>
> I'm not sure I know what you mean here. I'll have a look at that code.
The eLBC NAND controller presents an interface that runs enti
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom [mailto:tom@windriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 9:44 PM
> To: Hiremath, Vaibhav
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] AM3517: Add support for EMIF4
>
> Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> >> -Original M
Hi, everyone
I'm trying to connect ethernet with AT91SAM9260.
My board uses DM9161A as a ethernet transceiver.
The u-boot ethernet initialization routine runs auto-negotiation,
it works fine. Ethernet controller of AT91SAM9260
(MACB0) receives Auto negotiation completion bit
from DM9161A status
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom [mailto:tom@windriver.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 7:34 PM
> To: Hiremath, Vaibhav
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3_mmc: Encapsulate twl4030 under
> option CONFIG_TWL4030_POWER
>
> hvaib...@ti.com wrote:
> > Fr
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom [mailto:tom@windriver.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 9:21 PM
> To: Hiremath, Vaibhav
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4] OMAP3EVM: Added NAND support
>
> hvaib...@ti.com wrote:
> > From: Vaibhav Hiremath
> >
> > The E
Hi all,
I have been trying to debug 'strange' clock settings in the omap3evm; that would
surface quite infrequently. However, today I was able to get them regularly.
Symptom: the MPU clock is set at 381MHz instead of expected 500MHz.
Tracing back from prcm_init() to s_init() to lowlevel_init() a
<><>___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote on 27/11/2009 21:18:28:
> > I am not convinced yet that the new code is actually an improvement.
> > Changing the array of pointers into a list of function calls does not
> > solve any of the real issues we have with the init s
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:23:42AM -0800, julianosam wrote:
>
> Hi. Im new with embedded systems. I have a board which has a powerpc 8313
> processor on it, running a linux kernel + uboot.
>
> In the PowerPC Local Bus, there is a chipset connected to the CS02 powerpc
> pin. The problem is, i don'
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 08:14:41PM +0800, Peter Pan wrote:
> My u-boot version is u-boot-2009-08.
> In my U-boot, after I entered "nboot 80 0 0",
> the following messages shows:
>
> Loading from NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit, offset 0x0
>Image Name: Linux-2.6.22.sac.rd
>Image Type: PowerPC
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 30/11/2009 22:02:44:
>
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message 00453...@transmode.se> you wrote:
> > Wolfgang Denk wrote on 27/11/2009 21:18:28:
> > > I am not convinced yet that the new code is actually an improvement.
> > > Changing the array of pointers into a list of
Not all boards have both LEDs hooked, so enabling both on
boards with single LED will just waste power.
Make it possible to choose LEDs by adding arguments to
twl4030_led_init().
Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas
---
board/logicpd/zoom1/zoom1.c |2 +-
board/logicpd/zoom2/zoom2.c
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> > Yes. And all boards that don't need it will suffer from the increased
> > memory footprint.
>
> Sure, but I won't adding these extra call sites as an array of
> fptrs also add size? Since the new function as smaller than the current
> list, I
The previous u-boot version I use is U-boot 1.2.0, an ancient version.
So I upgrade the u-boot to 2009-08.
The platform is MPC8247.
About build warnings, some warnings in printf for not proper type, and
yes, I get the 64-bit printf warning :
nand_util.c:45:2: warning: #warning Please define
CONFIG
Peter Pan wrote:
> The previous u-boot version I use is U-boot 1.2.0, an ancient version.
> So I upgrade the u-boot to 2009-08.
> The platform is MPC8247.
That's a chip, not a platform. Which NAND controller driver? What
happens if you also use a non-ancient Linux? Have you compared the OOB
l
I defined the CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF, and change the __kernel__loff_t back
to long long, and it works.
My platform is a MPC8247 based customized board, which designed by my
colleagues.
Nand is Samsung K9K8G08U0M.
Thank you very much for your advice. Now my u-boot works fine now.
2009/12/1 Sc
Nick Thompson wrote:
> Improve read performance from Large Page NAND devices.
>
> This patch employs the following concepts to produce a ~37% improvement in
> oob_first read speed (on a 300MHz ARM9). The time for a mid-buffer 2k page
> read is now 260us, 7.88MB/s (was 357us, 5.74MB/s). oob_first i
25 matches
Mail list logo
