On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Joel A Fernandes,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> Just one question about one of your patches I happen to notice [1],
>> why is there a SPL build for each different boot mode such as for
>> NAND, MMC etc?. Wouldn't it be nicer to
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Simon Schwarz
wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> The current release (based on u-boot-ti) is V9:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/Simon/OMAP3_SPL_V9/
>
> Or V10
> http://mid.gmane.org/1315949258-12064-1-git-send-email-tr...@ti.com
> (based on u-boot-arm)
>
> Actually this m
On 09/16/2011 02:31 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Joel A Fernandes,
>
> In
> message
> you wrote:
>>
>> Just one question about one of your patches I happen to notice [1],
>> why is there a SPL build for each different boot mode such as for
>> NAND, MMC etc?. Wouldn't it be nicer to have a sin
Dear Joel A Fernandes,
In message
you wrote:
>
> Just one question about one of your patches I happen to notice [1],
> why is there a SPL build for each different boot mode such as for
> NAND, MMC etc?. Wouldn't it be nicer to have a single SPL loader that
> tried different boot modes one after
Hi Joel,
The current release (based on u-boot-ti) is V9:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/Simon/OMAP3_SPL_V9/
Or V10
http://mid.gmane.org/1315949258-12064-1-git-send-email-tr...@ti.com
(based on u-boot-arm)
Actually this may already work (although I haven't tested it yet). If
you define CO
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Great work on the SPL patches for omap. I am getting a bit familiar
> with this and earlier SPL work.
>
> Just one question about one of your patches I happen to notice [1],
Sorry, I was referring to this patch:
http://patch
6 matches
Mail list logo
