On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, J. William Campbell
wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:45 AM, J. William Campbell
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
[Yawn... YAS (Yet Another Snip) ;)]
>>
>> The relocation fixup is really easy:
>>
>>
Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:45 AM, J. William Campbell
> wrote:
>
>> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>
>
> Apologies if this is getting way off-topic for a simple boot loader, but
> this is information I have gathered from far and wide over the net. I am
> surprised that t
Graeme Russ wrote on 17/10/2009 07:17:04:
>
[SNIP]
>
> Apologies if this is getting way off-topic for a simple boot loader, but
> this is information I have gathered from far and wide over the net. I am
> surprised that there isn't a web site out there on 'How to create a
> relocatable boot load
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:45 AM, J. William Campbell
wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>
>> Graeme Russ wrote on 14/10/2009 13:48:27:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>>> wrote:
>>>
"J. William Campbell" wrote on 14/10/2009
01:48:52:
>
> J
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> "J. William Campbell" wrote on 14/10/2009
> 17:35:44:
>
>> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>
>>> "J. William Campbell" wrote on 14/10/2009
>>> 01:48:52:
>>>
>>>
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 22:06:56:
>>>
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote on 14/10/2009 13:48:27:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "J. William Campbell" wrote on 14/10/2009
>>> 01:48:52:
>>>
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/200
"J. William Campbell" wrote on 14/10/2009
17:35:44:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > "J. William Campbell" wrote on 14/10/2009
> > 01:48:52:
> >
> >> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >>
> >>> Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 22:06:56:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Joakim Tj
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> "J. William Campbell" wrote on 14/10/2009
> 01:48:52:
>
>> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>
>>> Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 22:06:56:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrot
Graeme Russ wrote on 14/10/2009 13:48:27:
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> > "J. William Campbell" wrote on 14/10/2009
> > 01:48:52:
> >>
> >> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >> > Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 22:06:56:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> "J. William Campbell" wrote on 14/10/2009
> 01:48:52:
>>
>> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>> > Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 22:06:56:
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Graeme Russ
"J. William Campbell" wrote on 14/10/2009
01:48:52:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 22:06:56:
> >
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 13:21:05:
> >>>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 22:06:56:
>
>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 13:21:05:
>>>
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> Gra
Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 22:06:56:
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> > Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 13:21:05:
> >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> >> wrote:
> >> > Graeme Russ wrote on 11/10/2009 12:47:19:
> >>
> >> [Massive Snip
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 13:21:05:
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>> > Graeme Russ wrote on 11/10/2009 12:47:19:
>>
>> [Massive Snip :)]
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> So, all that is left are .dynsym and .
"J. William Campbell" wrote on 13/10/2009
18:30:43:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 13:21:05:
> >
> >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Graeme Russ wrote on 11/10/2009 12:47:19:
> >>>
> >> [Massive Snip :)]
> >>
> >>
> >>
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 13:21:05:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Graeme Russ wrote on 11/10/2009 12:47:19:
>>>
>> [Massive Snip :)]
>>
>>
So, all that is left are .dynsym and .dynamic ...
Graeme Russ wrote on 13/10/2009 13:21:05:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> > Graeme Russ wrote on 11/10/2009 12:47:19:
>
> [Massive Snip :)]
>
> >
> >>
> >> So, all that is left are .dynsym and .dynamic ...
> >> .dynsym
> >> - Contains 70 entries (16 bytes ea
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote on 11/10/2009 12:47:19:
[Massive Snip :)]
>
>>
>> So, all that is left are .dynsym and .dynamic ...
>> .dynsym
>> - Contains 70 entries (16 bytes each, 1120 bytes)
>> - 44 entries mimic those entries in .got
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 13:21:10:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 12:38:19:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> >> wr
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:18 AM, J. William Campbell
wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 12:38:19:
>>>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
>
> Gr
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote on 10/10/2009 18:52:29:
>>
>> On Saturday 10 October 2009 06:47:42 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>> > Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 12:38:19:
>> > > -fpic / -pic make no difference
>> >
>> > not on x86, on ppc it is a bi
Mike Frysinger wrote on 10/10/2009 18:52:29:
>
> On Saturday 10 October 2009 06:47:42 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 12:38:19:
> > > -fpic / -pic make no difference
> >
> > not on x86, on ppc it is a big difference.
>
> i think you guys mean -fpic and -fPIC because th
On Saturday 10 October 2009 06:47:42 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 12:38:19:
> > -fpic / -pic make no difference
>
> not on x86, on ppc it is a big difference.
i think you guys mean -fpic and -fPIC because there is no -pic flag ... while
the two make a big diff on so
Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 13:21:10:
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 12:38:19:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 10:46:52:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
>
>
> Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 12:38:19:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 10:46:52:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> >>
Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 12:38:19:
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 10:46:52:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> >> wrote:
> >> > Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 06:43:52:
> >> >>
> >>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
>
>
> Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 10:46:52:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>> > Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 06:43:52:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> >> wrote:
>
Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 10:46:52:
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> > Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 06:43:52:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, J. William Campbell
>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 06:43:52:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, J. William Campbell
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Graeme Russ wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri
Graeme Russ wrote on 10/10/2009 06:43:52:
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, J. William Campbell
> >> wrote:
> >> > Graeme Russ wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 AM, J. William Campbell
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, J. William Campbell
>> wrote:
>> > Graeme Russ wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 AM, J. William Campbell
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Graeme Russ wrote:
>> >>>
>>
>> Out of c
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:02 +1100, Graeme Russ wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> > Dear Graeme Russ,
>> >
>> > In message
>> > you wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Once the reloc branch has been merged, how many arches
On Thursday 08 October 2009 18:20:18 Peter Tyser wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:02 +1100, Graeme Russ wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > Graeme Russ wrote:
> > >> Once the reloc branch has been merged, how many arches are left which
> > >> do not support reloc
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, J. William Campbell
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Graeme Russ wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 AM, J. William Campbell
wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote:
>
>
>> Out of curiosity, I wan
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, J. William Campbell
> wrote:
> > Graeme Russ wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 AM, J. William Campbell
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Graeme Russ wrote:
> >>>
>
> Out of curiosity, I wanted to see just how much of a size penalty I am
> i
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, J. William Campbell
wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 AM, J. William Campbell
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Graeme Russ wrote:
>>>
Out of curiosity, I wanted to see just how much of a size penalty I am
incurring by using gcc -fpic
Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 AM, J. William Campbell
> wrote:
>
>> Graeme Russ wrote:
>>
>>> Out of curiosity, I wanted to see just how much of a size penalty I am
>>> incurring by using gcc -fpic / ld -pic on my x86 u-boot build. Here are
>>> the results (fixed width f
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:02 +1100, Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Graeme Russ,
> >
> > In message
> > you wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Once the reloc branch has been merged, how many arches are left which do
> >> not support relocation?
> >
> > All bu
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Graeme Russ,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Once the reloc branch has been merged, how many arches are left which do
>> not support relocation?
>
> All but PPC ?
Hmm, so commit 0630535e2d062dd73c1ceca5c6125c86d1127a49 is all abou
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message you
wrote:
>
>
> Once the reloc branch has been merged, how many arches are left which do
> not support relocation?
All but PPC ?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kir
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 AM, J. William Campbell
wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote:
>>
>> Out of curiosity, I wanted to see just how much of a size penalty I am
>> incurring by using gcc -fpic / ld -pic on my x86 u-boot build. Here are
>> the results (fixed width font will help - its space, not tab, f
Peter Tyser wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 08:53 -0700, J. William Campbell wrote:
>
>> Peter Tyser wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 22:54 +1100, Graeme Russ wrote:
>>>
>>>
Out of curiosity, I wanted to see just how much of a size penalty I am
incurring by using gcc -
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 08:53 -0700, J. William Campbell wrote:
> Peter Tyser wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 22:54 +1100, Graeme Russ wrote:
> >
> >> Out of curiosity, I wanted to see just how much of a size penalty I am
> >> incurring by using gcc -fpic / ld -pic on my x86 u-boot build. Here ar
Graeme Russ wrote:
> Out of curiosity, I wanted to see just how much of a size penalty I am
> incurring by using gcc -fpic / ld -pic on my x86 u-boot build. Here are
> the results (fixed width font will help - its space, not tab, formatted):
>
> Section non-reloc reloc
> ---
Peter Tyser wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 22:54 +1100, Graeme Russ wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity, I wanted to see just how much of a size penalty I am
>> incurring by using gcc -fpic / ld -pic on my x86 u-boot build. Here are
>> the results (fixed width font will help - its space, not tab, forma
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 22:54 +1100, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Out of curiosity, I wanted to see just how much of a size penalty I am
> incurring by using gcc -fpic / ld -pic on my x86 u-boot build. Here are
> the results (fixed width font will help - its space, not tab, formatted):
>
> Section
46 matches
Mail list logo
