On Thursday 08 October 2009 18:20:18 Peter Tyser wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:02 +1100, Graeme Russ wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > > > Graeme Russ wrote: > > >> Once the reloc branch has been merged, how many arches are left which > > >> do not support relocation? > > > > > > All but PPC ? > > > > Hmm, so commit 0630535e2d062dd73c1ceca5c6125c86d1127a49 is all about > > removing code that is not used because these arches do not do any > > relocation at all? > > I sent that patch/RFC after noticing none of those architectures > performed manual relocation fixups, thus they could save some code space > by defining CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS. Similarly the gd->reloc_off field > was no longer needed for them. > > I'm not familiar with if or how those architectures are relocating, just > that they didn't need relocation fixups. So that was the logic...
the usage in the Blackfin port is most likely a copy & paste of existing code. deleting malloc_bin_reloc() from lib_blackfin/board.c and adding CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS results in a working boot. ive never really looked into relocation as no one has asked for it. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
