> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, J. William Campbell > <jwilliamcampb...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Graeme Russ wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 AM, J. William Campbell > >> <jwilliamcampb...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Graeme Russ wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Out of curiosity, I wanted to see just how much of a size penalty I am > >>>> incurring by using gcc -fpic / ld -pic on my x86 u-boot build. Here are > >>>> the results (fixed width font will help - its space, not tab, > >>>> formatted): > >>>> > >>>> Section non-reloc reloc > >>>> --------------------------------------- > >>>> .text 000118c4 000137fc <- 0x1f38 bytes (~8kB) bigger > >>>> .rodata 00005bad 000059d0 > >>>> .interp n/a 00000013 > >>>> .dynstr n/a 00000648 > >>>> .hash n/a 00000428 > >>>> .eh_frame 00003268 000034fc > >>>> .data 00000a6c 000001dc > >>>> .data.rel n/a 00000098 > >>>> .data.rel.ro.local n/a 00000178 > >>>> .data.rel.local n/a 000007e4 > >>>> .got 00000000 000001f0 > >>>> .got.plt n/a 0000000c > >>>> .rel.got n/a 000003e0 > >>>> .rel.dyn n/a 00001228 > >>>> .dynsym n/a 00000850 > >>>> .dynamic n/a 00000080 > >>>> .u_boot_cmd 000003c0 000003c0 > >>>> .bss 00001a34 00001a34 > >>>> .realmode 00000166 00000166 > >>>> .bios 0000053e 0000053e > >>>> ======================================= > >>>> Total 0001d5dd 00022287 <- 0x4caa bytes (~19kB) bigger > >>>> > >>>> Its more than a 16% increase in size!!! > >>>> > >>>> .text accounts for a little under half of the total bloat, and of that, > >>>> the crude dynamic loader accounts for only 341 bytes > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Hi Graeme, > >>> I would be interested in a third option (column), the x86 build with > >>> just -mrelocateable but NOT -fpic. It will not be definitive because > >>> there > >>> will be extra code that references the GOT and missing code to do some of > >>> the relocation, but it would still be interesting. > >>> > >> > >> x86 does not have -mrelocatable. This is a PPC only option :( > >> > > > > Hi Graeme, > > You are unfortunately correct. However, I wonder if we can get > > essentially the same result by executing the final ld step with the > > --emit-relocs switch included. This may also include some "extra" sections > > that we would want to strip out, but if it works, it could give all > > ELF-based systems a way to a relocatable u-boot. > > > > I don't think --emit-relocs is necessary with -pic. I haven't gone through > all the permutations to see if there is a smaller option, but gcc -fpic and > ld -pie creates enough information to perform relocation on the x86 > platform
Try -fvisibility=hidden Jocke _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
