t; Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload
>>
>> Dear Jean-Christophe,
>>
>> in message <20090921113701.gp29...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>>>> Atmel (AT91): Jean-Christo
Dear Prafulla,
in message <73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e202ed512...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com>
you wrote:
>
> > - IXP and PXA are really low traffic these days (EOL products); I
> > think we can give up these repositories and just ran this through
> > the generic ARM repo.
>
> I would love to
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe,
>
> in message <20090921113701.gp29...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>>> Atmel (AT91): Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
>>>
>>> Marvell (PXA + IXP):Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
>> I decline it
>
> Thank you for
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 6:14 PM
> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RF
Dear Jean-Christophe,
in message <20090921113701.gp29...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> > Atmel (AT91): Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
> >
> > Marvell (PXA + IXP):Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
> I decline it
Thank you for the clear statement. Thanks
On 23:57 Fri 04 Sep , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big
> number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in
> this area is literally exploding. This is partially due to the fact
> that ARM is curr
Dear Wolfgang,
2009/9/7 Wolfgang Denk
> Hello everybody,
>
> I wrote on
>
> | Hello everybody,
> |
> | ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big
> | number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in
> | this area is literally exploding. This is parti
Hello everybody,
I wrote on
| Hello everybody,
|
| ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big
| number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in
| this area is literally exploding. This is partially due to the fact
| that ARM is currently used in man
Dear Kyungmin Park,
In message <9c9fda240909061806j5ecc26c3ie53215e8aa017...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > Samsung (s3c, s5pc):Are there any volunteers at Samsung?
> >
>
> I recommended the Minky Kang. He's working for several years for
> u-boot from pxa, omap3, s3c6410 and s5pc1xx
Dear Magnus,
In message <59b21cf20909070206t189fe96bpac3cce2770b6b...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > Freescale (i.MX) Magnus Lilja?
> >Or are there any volunteers at Freescale?
>
> I don't have the time to handle this in a good way. It would be goo
Hi Wolfgang,
2009/9/4 Wolfgang Denk :
> Hello everybody,
>
> After much thinking I therefor suggest to implement the following
> change for the ARM architecture:
>
>
> master ARM repository: Tom Rix
>
> Atmel (AT91): Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
>
> Freescale (i.MX)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:plagn...@jcrosoft.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 4:48 AM
> To: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Rix; Magnus Lilja; Prafulla
> Wadaskar; Dirk Behme; Minkyu Kang; Kyungmin Park; Harald Welte
> S
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Kyungmin Park
> Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 6:36 AM
> To: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big
> number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in
> this area is literally exploding. This is partially due to the fact
> that ARM is
Dear Tom,
In message <4aa3bf2f.3080...@windriver.com> you wrote:
>
> This means an omap/davinci split ?
> u-boot-arm-omap
> u-boot-arm-davinci
>
> This is ok with me
I would like to avoid this, at least for now. Let's do a first step
now (split into vendor based sub-repos), and stabilize that. T
Dear Sandeep,
In message <0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5d91e07...@dlee01.ent.ti.com> you
wrote:
>
> This is also what we have been discussing internally within TI to have an
> omap/davinci split.
I'm not happy about the idea. If there really is need (or reason) to
split these, I would prefer
t is OK with the others as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Sandeep
>
> From: Tom [tom@windriver.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 9:54 AM
> To: Paulraj, Sandeep
> Cc: Dirk Behme; Wolfgang Denk; Kyungmin Park; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus
&
; Wolfgang Denk; Kyungmin Park; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus
Lilja; Minkyu Kang
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
> Wolfgang, Dirk,
>
> I can take responsibility for TI DaVinci SOCs.
>
>
This means an omap/davinci split ?
u-bo
ot-boun...@lists.denx.de [u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf
> Of Dirk Behme [dirk.be...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 3:39 AM
> To: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Tom Rix; Kyungmin Park; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] R
Denk
Cc: Tom Rix; Kyungmin Park; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload
Dear Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Texas Instruments (OMAP): Dirk Behme?
> Or are there any volunteers at
Dear Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Texas Instruments (OMAP): Dirk Behme?
> Or are there any volunteers at TI?
I really like to see someone from TI here, instead.
Looking at some past discussions, I think somebody from TI would be
the best. E.g.:
- While dis
On 23:57 Fri 04 Sep , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big
> number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in
> this area is literally exploding. This is partially due to the fact
> that ARM is curr
22 matches
Mail list logo
