On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Wolfgang Denk<w...@denx.de> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big > number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in > this area is literally exploding. This is partially due to the fact > that ARM is currently used in many designs, so many new ARM based > processors and SoCs and even more new ARM boards show up, but another > and at least as important change is that some silicon and board > vendors have started to actively pushing their products into the > U-Boot (and Linux) mainline source trees (and *welcome* they all > are!). > > It has become evident that this growing complexity has become way too > massive to be shouldered by a single custodian, even a very active one > like Jean-Christophe. > > I think we have no other choice but to add more manpower to this task, > i. e. split the ARM respository and distribute the workload across a > few more custodians. > > Unline with the Power architecture, where the split can be easily > defined by processor lines, with ARM it seems more logical to me to > differentiate by silicon vendors. > > After much thinking I therefor suggest to implement the following > change for the ARM architecture: > > > master ARM repository: Tom Rix > > Atmel (AT91): Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard > > Freescale (i.MX) Magnus Lilja? > Or are there any volunteers at Freescale? > > Marvell (PXA + IXP): Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard > > Marvell (all other): Prafulla Wadaskar > > Samsung (s3c, s5pc): Are there any volunteers at Samsung? >
I recommended the Minky Kang. He's working for several years for u-boot from pxa, omap3, s3c6410 and s5pc1xx series. But with our internal security policy it's hard to use ssh on u-boot git. so we want to use u-boot-arm as base. Thank you, Kyungmin Park _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
