On Wednesday 08 July 2009 02:58:42 Peter Tyser wrote:
> Robin Getz wrote:
> > On Wed 8 Jul 2009 01:58, Mike Frysinger pondered:
> >> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:24:56 Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 15:02
Robin Getz wrote:
> On Wed 8 Jul 2009 01:58, Mike Frysinger pondered:
>> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:24:56 Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote:
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>
On Wed 8 Jul 2009 01:58, Mike Frysinger pondered:
> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:24:56 Kumar Gala wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > >> On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote:
> > >>> Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Those would he
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:24:56 Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >> On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote:
> >>> Kumar Gala wrote:
> Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this
> case
On Tue 7 Jul 2009 15:49, Kumar Gala pondered:
>
> Where, do you mean bloat-o-meter?
rg...@imhotep:~/linux-2.6.x> ./scripts/bloat-o-meter
usage: ./scripts/bloat-o-meter file1 file2
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman
On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote:
>>> Kumar Gala wrote:
Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this
case the code itself is just larger.
>>> Perhaps we should loo
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:50:31 -0500
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this case
> the code itself is just larger.
fyi, gcc4.4.0 apparently doesn't like to emit ld/st multiple insns as
much as prior versions did.
NAND bootstraps don't fit, e.g., beca
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:50:31PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 2:16 PM, T Ziomek wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:34:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>use the bloatcheck script to do a human readable compare between
> >>the two
> >>objects. you can find it in the linux
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote:
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this case
>>> the code itself is just larger.
>> Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation that
>> ta
On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this case
> > the code itself is just larger.
>
> Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation that
> takes a space/speed tradeoff more in line wi
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this case
> the code itself is just larger.
Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation that
takes a space/speed tradeoff more in line with U-boot's requirements
(using a simple first-fit line
On Jul 7, 2009, at 2:16 PM, T Ziomek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:34:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 12:30:18 Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> Here are some size #'s
>>>
>>> [ga...@blarg u-boot-85xx]$ size u-boot
>>>textdata bss dec hex filename
>>
On Jul 7, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 12:30:18 Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
>>> ---
>>> This is an attempt at using dlmalloc v2.8.4. Its a work in
>>> progress, but
>>> wanted to post to s
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:34:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 12:30:18 Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Here are some size #'s
> >
> > [ga...@blarg u-boot-85xx]$ size u-boot
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 392040 50536 41957 484533 764b5 u-b
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 12:30:18 Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
> > ---
> > This is an attempt at using dlmalloc v2.8.4. Its a work in
> > progress, but
> > wanted to post to see what peoples feelings are on updating. This
> > ver
On Jul 7, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
> ---
> This is an attempt at using dlmalloc v2.8.4. Its a work in
> progress, but
> wanted to post to see what peoples feelings are on updating. This
> version
> resolves all the various warnings we see w/gcc4.4 an
16 matches
Mail list logo
