Kumar Gala wrote: > Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this case > the code itself is just larger.
Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation that takes a space/speed tradeoff more in line with U-boot's requirements (using a simple first-fit linear scan of free blocks, for example) -- and hopefully more readable than dlmalloc? I nominate those with the tightest space requirements to do this. :-) -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
