Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote: >> Kumar Gala wrote: >>> Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this case >>> the code itself is just larger. >> Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation that >> takes a space/speed tradeoff more in line with U-boot's requirements >> (using a simple first-fit linear scan of free blocks, for example) -- >> and hopefully more readable than dlmalloc? >> >> I nominate those with the tightest space requirements to do this. :-) > I agree it's sound a better plan > but I'll take a lot's of time
Right, for now we can use the existing malloc with -fno-strict-aliasing. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
