Hi
U-boot is unable to enumerate pericom PCIe switch and subsequent end point
devices on our board (arm v8.2, 64-bit)
When booted to linux, we see the same enumerated with endpoints
Have any one come ever come across this issue and found a workaround to it?
I hope we no need to have
Hi
U-boot is unable to enumerate pericom PCIe switch and subsequent end point
devices on our board (arm v8.2, 64-bit)
When booted to linux, we see the same enumerated with endpoints
Have any one come ever come across this issue and found a workaround to it?
I hope we no need to have a spec
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about the U-Boot development model,
so I am hoping that someone might be able to clear it up:
In Linux, you can send patches at any time to the maintainer of a subsystem.
They will apply them to a fixes/next branch and it will be merged into mainline
during the next merge w
Hi
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 2:16 PM Stefano Babic wrote:
>
> Hi Jiri,
>
> On 08/10/19 15:50, Ing. Jiří Valek wrote:
> > Hello,
> > can I ask what's wrong with my patch v2 ?
> > It's quite long time no answer..
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1037203/
> >
> > Regards Jiri Valek
>
> Patch can
Hi Jiri,
On 08/10/19 15:50, Ing. Jiří Valek wrote:
> Hello,
> can I ask what's wrong with my patch v2 ?
> It's quite long time no answer..
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1037203/
>
> Regards Jiri Valek
Patch cannot be applied: please send a V3 with your Signed-off-by and
with a commit mess
On 08/10/19 15:50, Ing. Jiří Valek wrote:
> Hello,
> can I ask what's wrong with my patch v2 ?
> It's quite long time no answer..
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1037203/
>
> Regards Jiri Valek
I do not know - patch is set to "Changes Requested", see :
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/103
Hi Aaron,
On 19.09.19 13:35, Aaron Williams wrote:
Hi,
In my device tree I need to translate some address via ranges but I'm running
into some issues. If I use ofnode_get_addr_size() it is not using the
#address-cells and #size-cells nor is it performing the ranges translation. It
always assume
Hi,
In my device tree I need to translate some address via ranges but I'm running
into some issues. If I use ofnode_get_addr_size() it is not using the
#address-cells and #size-cells nor is it performing the ranges translation. It
always assumes #address-cells and #size-cells is 2 and doesn't t
Dear Tom,
In message <20190726170700.GQ20116@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> > It was designed in 1987. A subset of Nimbus Sans L were released
> > under the GPL. Although the characters are not exactly the same,
> > Nimbus Sans L has metrics almost identical to Helveti
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:34:06PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 2:13 AM Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:34:20AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 11:07, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 06:42
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 2:13 AM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:34:20AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 11:07, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > According t
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:34:20AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 11:07, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > According to the Kconfig entry,
> > > drivers/video/fonts/nimbus_sans_l_regular.t
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 11:07, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > According to the Kconfig entry,
> > drivers/video/fonts/nimbus_sans_l_regular.ttf
> > is licensed under GPL v3.
> >
> > How the license is handled when U-Boot i
Hi there.
I was wondering whether you have plans to add support for the BP3 and
Top/Bottom bits of the Status Register, making it possible to lock flash
regions with full flexibility, within the device constrains of course.
That would be the current stm_lock() and friends.
Further, do you have p
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
>
> According to the Kconfig entry,
> drivers/video/fonts/nimbus_sans_l_regular.ttf
> is licensed under GPL v3.
>
> How the license is handled when U-Boot is compiled with
> CONFIG_CONSOLE_TRUETYPE_NIMBUS=y ?
>
> I am asking
Hi.
According to the Kconfig entry,
drivers/video/fonts/nimbus_sans_l_regular.ttf
is licensed under GPL v3.
How the license is handled when U-Boot is compiled with
CONFIG_CONSOLE_TRUETYPE_NIMBUS=y ?
I am asking this since many companies, I guess,
have GPL-v3 allergy.
config CONSOLE_TRUETYPE_NI
Hi Stefano,
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Question regarding the Common Clock Framework CCF
> v5 patches
>
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On 04/07/19 13:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:37:42AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
>
Hi Stefano,
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On 04/07/19 13:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:37:42AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> I'm a bit puzzled about the CCF v5 patches for i.MX6 (the series
> >> can be found below):
> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1121
Hi Lukasz,
On 04/07/19 13:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:37:42AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> I'm a bit puzzled about the CCF v5 patches for i.MX6 (the series can
>> be found below):
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1121348/
>>
>> I'm delegated to merge t
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:37:42AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I'm a bit puzzled about the CCF v5 patches for i.MX6 (the series can
> be found below):
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1121348/
>
> I'm delegated to merge those, but I don' think that I shall merge my
> own patch
Hi Tom,
I'm a bit puzzled about the CCF v5 patches for i.MX6 (the series can
be found below):
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1121348/
I'm delegated to merge those, but I don' think that I shall merge my
own patches.
Hence, I would like to ask you to change the delegation (or I can do it
mysel
Hi Stefan
Stefan Roese 於 2019年6月3日 週一 下午9:05寫道：
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> On 03.06.19 11:27, Rick Chen wrote:
> > Hi Stefan and other seniors
> >
> > I encounter some problems about cfi flash driver.
> > And hope you can give some comments to resolve it.
> > Followings are the flash verification status an
Hi Rick,
On 03.06.19 11:27, Rick Chen wrote:
Hi Stefan and other seniors
I encounter some problems about cfi flash driver.
And hope you can give some comments to resolve it.
Followings are the flash verification status and descriptions :
When I verify cfi flash which it's address base is in ca
Hi Stefan and other seniors
I encounter some problems about cfi flash driver.
And hope you can give some comments to resolve it.
Followings are the flash verification status and descriptions :
When I verify cfi flash which it's address base is in cacheable region
(0x8800) and cache is enabled
Hi Stefano,
> Hallo Lukasz,
>
> On 27/02/19 10:13, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Stefano.
> >
> >> Hi Lukasz,
> >>
> >> I have the use case and a tbot testcase. But we are now at EW,
> >> please wait until I am back.
> >
> > Ach I've just realised this :-)
> > Have a nice time there :-)
Hallo Lukasz,
On 27/02/19 10:13, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Stefano.
>
>> Hi Lukasz,
>>
>> I have the use case and a tbot testcase. But we are now at EW, please
>> wait until I am back.
>
> Ach I've just realised this :-)
> Have a nice time there :-)
>
We are back, but I think today I jus
Greetings.
Background: I am working with an AllWinner H5 (Quad A-53 aarch64) board
which contains a smallish amount of SPI flash for U-Boot. The U-Boot build
process ends up with a single concatenated file (u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin)
containing the ATF, U-Boot itself and the device tree file. T
Hi Lukasz,
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 01:50, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> > Hi Lukasz,
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 15:13, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > I've stumbled upon a following issue:
> > >
> > > - I do have a vybrid SoC which is not using SPL. It only u
Hi Simon,
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 15:13, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I've stumbled upon a following issue:
> >
> > - I do have a vybrid SoC which is not using SPL. It only uses U-boot
> > proper (u-boot.vyb).
> >
> > - In the board_early_init_f() (when we ar
Hi Lukasz,
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 15:13, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I've stumbled upon a following issue:
>
> - I do have a vybrid SoC which is not using SPL. It only uses U-boot
> proper (u-boot.vyb).
>
> - In the board_early_init_f() (when we are still in SRAM) I do perform
> p
Dear All,
I've stumbled upon a following issue:
- I do have a vybrid SoC which is not using SPL. It only uses U-boot
proper (u-boot.vyb).
- In the board_early_init_f() (when we are still in SRAM) I do perform
pinctrl (pinmux) setup for UART1 (this is the console device).
- I also do use uca
On 10/31/2018 03:52 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your help.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:32 PM Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi Masahiro,
On 30.10.18 14:20, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi Alex,
Could you teach me a little bit
about efi_loader?
I guess I am seriously missing somet
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your help.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:32 PM Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On 30.10.18 14:20, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> >
> > Could you teach me a little bit
> > about efi_loader?
> >
> > I guess I am seriously missing something,
> > but how t
Hi Masahiro,
On 30.10.18 14:20, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
>
> Could you teach me a little bit
> about efi_loader?
>
> I guess I am seriously missing something,
> but how to pass initramdisk address when you use
> bootefi (like when you use 'booti') ?
>
>
> What I did:
>
>> tftpboot
Hi Alex,
Could you teach me a little bit
about efi_loader?
I guess I am seriously missing something,
but how to pass initramdisk address when you use
bootefi (like when you use 'booti') ?
What I did:
> tftpboot 9000 Image
> tftpboot 9800 uniphier-ld11-global.dtb
> bootefi 900
Hi,
i hope questions are also allowed on this mailing list :)
i try to port environment-saving from 2014-04 to 2018-11...and in 2014 i see
that an offset of 1 MB is added to address when booting from SD-Card. I have
the boot-device-detection ready, but i'm unsure how to implement the
env-adre
On 11/09/2018 12:45, Adam Ford wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 6:40 AM Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
Hi Adam,
On 09/09/2018 14:19, Adam Ford wrote:
I was having some issues with a DM3730 properly reading the card
detect on GPIO 127 and attributed it to being related to the pbias
register. I h
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 6:40 AM Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
>
> On 09/09/2018 14:19, Adam Ford wrote:
> > I was having some issues with a DM3730 properly reading the card
> > detect on GPIO 127 and attributed it to being related to the pbias
> > register. I have since submitted a pa
Hi Adam,
On 09/09/2018 14:19, Adam Ford wrote:
I was having some issues with a DM3730 properly reading the card
detect on GPIO 127 and attributed it to being related to the pbias
register. I have since submitted a patch to enable GPIO_127, but I am
not the best approach.
On the HSMMC driver,
I was having some issues with a DM3730 properly reading the card
detect on GPIO 127 and attributed it to being related to the pbias
register. I have since submitted a patch to enable GPIO_127, but I am
not the best approach.
On the HSMMC driver, there are explicit commands to Disable extended
dra
Hello all,
I'd like to know what's the difference between the Frescale imx board
repositories from:
1) https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/uboot-imx
2) https://github.com/Freescale/u-boot-fslc
It seems that #2 is rebased more often and is referenced by yocto. I
was wordering if the differ
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Grygorii Strashko
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have question about uclass to be used for SoC devices (./drivers/soc/).
> Now there is only ./drivers/soc/keystone/keystone_serdes.c which is not DM
> converted,
> but we are going to add more drivers for SoC specific compo
Hi All,
I have question about uclass to be used for SoC devices (./drivers/soc/).
Now there is only ./drivers/soc/keystone/keystone_serdes.c which is not DM
converted,
but we are going to add more drivers for SoC specific components soon and
internally I've used UCLASS_MISC for now. Is it accepta
Hi.
I was trying to write a file to FAT file system
by U-Boot command.
I tried 'fatwrite' and 'save'.
I cannot create a file in a sub-directory.
> fatwrite mmc 0:1 8100 boot/a 10
created a file 'boot/a' in the root directory.
But I want a file 'a' in the directory path '/boot/'.
2018-04-09 10:26 GMT+02:00 Bin Meng :
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Christian Gmeiner
> wrote:
>> Hi Bin
>>
>> 2018-04-06 10:30 GMT+02:00 Christian Gmeiner :
>>> Hi Bin
>>>
>>> 2018-04-06 9:47 GMT+02:00 Bin Meng :
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:55 PM, C
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Christian Gmeiner
wrote:
> Hi Bin
>
> 2018-04-06 10:30 GMT+02:00 Christian Gmeiner :
>> Hi Bin
>>
>> 2018-04-06 9:47 GMT+02:00 Bin Meng :
>>> Hi Christian,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Christian Gmeiner
>>> wrote:
Hi
I tried
Hi Bin
2018-04-06 10:30 GMT+02:00 Christian Gmeiner :
> Hi Bin
>
> 2018-04-06 9:47 GMT+02:00 Bin Meng :
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Christian Gmeiner
>> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I tried my luck on the u-boot irc channel but nobody cared so I am
>>> asking this here again.
Hi Bin
2018-04-06 9:47 GMT+02:00 Bin Meng :
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Christian Gmeiner
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I tried my luck on the u-boot irc channel but nobody cared so I am
>> asking this here again.
>> Does cpu_get_count(..) return the number of physical CPUs or the
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Christian Gmeiner
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tried my luck on the u-boot irc channel but nobody cared so I am
> asking this here again.
> Does cpu_get_count(..) return the number of physical CPUs or the
> number of logical CPUs?
>
> I am currently preparing a
Hi
I tried my luck on the u-boot irc channel but nobody cared so I am
asking this here again.
Does cpu_get_count(..) return the number of physical CPUs or the
number of logical CPUs?
I am currently preparing a patch set which adds
arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/cpu.c and there I need
to specify a struct
Dear Christophe,
In message <20180303165059.a03cf240...@gemini.denx.de> I wrote:
>
> That used to be standard at the beginning of time, i. e. even when
> this was still called PPCBoot... Check out any old version, and
> look for example at the configuration of the TQM8xx boards; they all
> used
Dear Christophe,
In message <31268795-2370-e5b2-5326-a5e5c41ce...@c-s.fr> you wrote:
> On my powerpc 8xx board, I have an AM29LV160DB boot flash which is
> organised as follows:
> - One 16kb block
> - Two 8kb block
> - One 32kb block
> - Thirty one 64kb blocks
>
> At the time being, u-boot is a
On my powerpc 8xx board, I have an AM29LV160DB boot flash which is
organised as follows:
- One 16kb block
- Two 8kb block
- One 32kb block
- Thirty one 64kb blocks
At the time being, u-boot is a single piece occupying the 320 first
kbytes, then the environment is stored in the following 64kb bl
For Nios II arch_cpu_init_dm, the uclass_first_device_err is called to find the
UCLASS_CPU. This happened right after initf_dm during board_init_f. No SPL is
involved here.
Tracing through uclass_first_device_err function, I notice that it tries to
find the uclass (via uclass_get) but not succe
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 10:44:17 +0200
daggs wrote:
> Greetings Lukasz,
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 4:12 PM
> > From: "Lukasz Majewski"
> > To: daggs
> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] question regarding the odroidc2 boar
Greetings Lukasz,
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 4:12 PM
> From: "Lukasz Majewski"
> To: daggs
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] question regarding the odroidc2 board support
>
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:58:46 +0200
> daggs wrote:
>
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:58:46 +0200
daggs wrote:
> Greetings Lukasz
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 10:57 AM
> > From: "Lukasz Majewski"
> > To: daggs
> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] question regarding the odroidc2 b
Greetings Lukasz
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 10:57 AM
> From: "Lukasz Majewski"
> To: daggs
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] question regarding the odroidc2 board support
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 19:55:21 +0200
> daggs wrote:
&g
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 19:55:21 +0200
daggs wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm using buildroot to generate images for the odroid c2 boards and
> from what I see, it uses u-boot.bin to burn into the image. I'm not
> seeing any other uboot product that is used for booting (unless I'm
> mistaken). I'm readin
Greetings,
I'm using buildroot to generate images for the odroid c2 boards and from what I
see, it uses u-boot.bin to burn into the image.
I'm not seeing any other uboot product that is used for booting (unless I'm
mistaken).
I'm reading the odroid c2 readme file and I see it instructs the use t
2017-02-27 10:07 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Majewski :
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:27:42 +0100
> Eric BOUXIROT wrote:
>
>> I’m using u-boot-2015.07 in one of my project based on vpac270 soc
>> module.
>>
>> u-boot is well configured and build is fine without error.
>>
>> Gcc is v3.4.5 and glibc v2.3.6 built by
Hi Lukasz,
>> I’m using u-boot-2015.07 in one of my project based on vpac270 soc
>> module.
>>
>> u-boot is well configured and build is fine without error.
>>
>> Gcc is v3.4.5 and glibc v2.3.6 built by crosstool 0.43 for
>> arm-softfloat-linux-gnu
>
> Could you try to use newer gcc and see if boo
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:27:42 +0100
Eric BOUXIROT wrote:
> I’m using u-boot-2015.07 in one of my project based on vpac270 soc
> module.
>
> u-boot is well configured and build is fine without error.
>
> Gcc is v3.4.5 and glibc v2.3.6 built by crosstool 0.43 for
> arm-softfloat-linux-gnu
Could y
Hi everyone,
I’m using u-boot-2015.07 in one of my project based on vpac270 soc module.
u-boot is well configured and build is fine without error.
Gcc is v3.4.5 and glibc v2.3.6 built by crosstool 0.43 for
arm-softfloat-linux-gnu
My problem is when i use DHCP command to retrieve a file from
Hi everyone,
I’m using u-boot-2015.07 in one of my project based on vpac270 soc module.
u-boot is well configured and build is fine without error.
Gcc is v3.4.5 and glibc v2.3.6 built by crosstool 0.43 for
arm-softfloat-linux-gnu
My problem is when i use DHCP command to retrieve a file from my
dear all,
i'm new in yocto!
i'm using *imx6sxsabresd* and i'm trying to port the u-boot for it.
(just to learn! in next step i will design my own board with iMX6 SoloX)
now i don't have *sf commands* in boot command prompt! even though i
activated them in /configs/_defconfig
what else should
looking at another Kconfig file -- common/Kconfig -- and i find it
curious that there are a couple BOOTSTAGE config options that don't
depend on BOOTSTAGE:
config BOOTSTAGE_USER_COUNT
hex "Number of boot ID numbers available for user use"
default 20
help
This i
Hello all,
In pci_hose_scan_bus(), there is this check:
if (vendor == 0x || vendor == 0x)
continue;
The test against the special invalid vendor value of 0x is
definitely correct. But is it necessarily wrong for a vendor ID to be
0? Of course it's not used in the PCI ven
Hi,
it is platform which has Xilinx chip on it but it is not Xilinx
platform. It is Avnet platform.
I have looked at your first patch and I told you also there to send
this patch directly to u-boot mailing list.
Thanks,
Michal
On 17.10.2016 13:24, Oscar Gomez Fuente wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I
Hi everyone,
I'm a new user and this is the first time I had to send a path.
I've found an error to fix and I've just sent a patch to the u-boot-xnlx
repository because is related to a Xilinx platform: Zynq picozed.
The question is: Do I have to send the same patch to the u-boot repository?
Bes
admittedly a simple question that i'll be able to test once i get
into the lab later today, but if someone knows the answer, terrific.
putting u-boot on a target board where there already exists, at a
well-known address, a set of "var=val" settings, with the format:
var1=val1 var2=val2 ...
Hi,
I am trying to activate bootstage on ARMV7 architecture.
My platform use the generic armv7 timer defined in file
./arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/timer.c:
For me the get_timer function should not used before timer_init (which
initialize gd->arch.timer_rate_hz) at least for the ARMV7 timer.
But in the i
On Thursday 04 August 2016 10:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02 Aug 2016, at 12:59, Keerthy wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Tuesday 02 August 2016 07:24 AM, Keerthy wrote:
On Tuesday 02 August 2016 03:16 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 01 Aug 2016, at 11:07, Keerthy wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I am tr
> On 02 Aug 2016, at 12:59, Keerthy wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
>
> On Tuesday 02 August 2016 07:24 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 02 August 2016 03:16 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
On 01 Aug 2016, at 11:07, Keerthy wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I am trying to enable hy
Hi Alex,
On Tuesday 02 August 2016 07:24 AM, Keerthy wrote:
On Tuesday 02 August 2016 03:16 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 01 Aug 2016, at 11:07, Keerthy wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I am trying to enable hypervisor in u-boot for DRA7(A15 based) family
of SoCs which does not have LPAE support yet
On Monday 01 August 2016 11:11 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi Keerthy,
Am 01.08.2016 um 12:07 schrieb Keerthy:
I am trying to enable hypervisor in u-boot for DRA7(A15 based) family of
SoCs which does not have LPAE support yet.
Is it mandatory for LPAE to be enabled before enabling hypervisor f
On Tuesday 02 August 2016 03:16 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 01 Aug 2016, at 11:07, Keerthy wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I am trying to enable hypervisor in u-boot for DRA7(A15 based) family of SoCs
which does not have LPAE support yet.
Is it mandatory for LPAE to be enabled before enabling hype
> On 01 Aug 2016, at 11:07, Keerthy wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> I am trying to enable hypervisor in u-boot for DRA7(A15 based) family of SoCs
> which does not have LPAE support yet.
>
> Is it mandatory for LPAE to be enabled before enabling hypervisor for A15?
HYP mode shares the same page
Hi Keerthy,
Am 01.08.2016 um 12:07 schrieb Keerthy:
> I am trying to enable hypervisor in u-boot for DRA7(A15 based) family of
> SoCs which does not have LPAE support yet.
>
> Is it mandatory for LPAE to be enabled before enabling hypervisor for A15?
On the Linux kernel side you can't enable KVM
Hi Alexander,
I am trying to enable hypervisor in u-boot for DRA7(A15 based) family of
SoCs which does not have LPAE support yet.
Is it mandatory for LPAE to be enabled before enabling hypervisor for A15?
I was looking at commit:
commit d990f5c834f1b42293fb53e4fd7f3aa988184196
Author: Alexan
Hi Lukasz,
On 16-01-29 08:40 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 16-01-26 05:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 01:35:55 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
Hi Marek & Lukasz,
I have an issue running fastboot on my board (which is
USB_SPEED_HIGH):
=> fastboot0
Hi Steve,
>
>
> On 16-01-26 05:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 01:35:55 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
> >> Hi Marek & Lukasz,
> >>
> >>
> >> I have an issue running fastboot on my board (which is
> >> USB_SPEED_HIGH):
> >>
> >> => fastboot0
> >>
> >> failed to en
Please explain the following logic in "drivers/usb/gadget/f_fastboot.c":
422) static unsigned int rx_bytes_expected(unsigned int maxpacket)
423) {
424) int rx_remain = download_size - download_bytes;
425) int rem = 0;
426) if (rx_remain < 0)
427) return 0;
428) if
On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 02:58:38 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
> On 16-01-26 05:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 01:35:55 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
> >> Hi Marek & Lukasz,
> >>
> >> I have an issue running fastboot on my board (which is USB_SPEED_HIGH):
> >> => fast
On 16-01-26 05:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 01:35:55 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
Hi Marek & Lukasz,
I have an issue running fastboot on my board (which is USB_SPEED_HIGH):
=> fastboot0
failed to enable in ep
failed to enable in ep
failed to ena
On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 01:35:55 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
> Hi Marek & Lukasz,
>
>
> I have an issue running fastboot on my board (which is USB_SPEED_HIGH):
>
> => fastboot0
>
> failed to enable in ep
>
> failed to enable in ep
>
> failed to enable in ep
>
> Because of
Hi Marek & Lukasz,
I have an issue running fastboot on my board (which is USB_SPEED_HIGH):
=> fastboot0
failed to enable in ep
failed to enable in ep
failed to enable in ep
Because of this, fastboot does not even initialize properly, and I need
to "^C" to break out…
I have tr
+Lukasz and a few others
Hi Brian,
On 31 August 2015 at 16:38, wrote:
>
> Dell Customer Communication
>
>
>
> I have a question with respect to the .itb as a complete bootable/execution
> entity.
>
>
>
> OUR PAST DESIGNs:
>
> Our past home grown solutions,much like fit update,is a bin
Dell Customer Communication
I have a question with respect to the .itb as a complete bootable/execution
entity.
OUR PAST DESIGNs:
Our past home grown solutions,much like fit update,is a binary that
contains the various components (meaning kernel, root file system, other stuff).
1)
Hi Simon, Brian,
> +Jagan, Lukasz
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> On 19 August 2015 at 15:07, wrote:
> > Dell Customer Communication
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > PURPOSE:
> >
> > This email is with respect to the “fitupd” command.
> >
> > In looking at the source in the current u-boot tree, fitupd
> > supports
+Jagan, Lukasz
Hi Brian,
On 19 August 2015 at 15:07, wrote:
> Dell Customer Communication
>
>
>
>
>
> PURPOSE:
>
> This email is with respect to the “fitupd” command.
>
> In looking at the source in the current u-boot tree, fitupd supports a NOR
> flash only.
>
>
>
>
>
> OUR GOAL:
>
> We woul
Dell Customer Communication
PURPOSE:
This email is with respect to the "fitupd" command.
In looking at the source in the current u-boot tree, fitupd supports a NOR
flash only.
OUR GOAL:
We would like to expand fitupd to be able to flash a SPI NOR, and MMC block
devices.
This would require
Hi Suriyan,
On 18 August 2015 at 19:31, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> Hi folks and Simon,
> After moving to the driver model for USB, I see that the call to
> board_usb_init() is not done anymore. This has the board specific
> initialisation sequence. It used to be called before the driver model
Hi folks and Simon,
After moving to the driver model for USB, I see that the call to
board_usb_init() is not done anymore. This has the board specific
initialisation sequence. It used to be called before the driver model
existed by usb_lowlevel_init(). Without it, usb fails to work.
I see t
Hi,
On 10 August 2015 at 06:20, 魏晓萌 wrote:
> Does anyone know the location of "start" label?
> i find that arch/arm/cpu/armXXX/start.S starts with a "reset" label. It
> spend me a lot of time to find where the "start" lable is.
>
> my u-boot version is 2015.07.
Do you mean _start?
You can use '
Does anyone know the location of "start" label?
i find that arch/arm/cpu/armXXX/start.S starts with a "reset" label. It
spend me a lot of time to find where the "start" lable is.
my u-boot version is 2015.07.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 05:48:49 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi!
> 2015-07-28 2:03 GMT+09:00 Marek Vasut :
> > On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 05:37:52 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> Hi Marek, other USB guys,
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >> I noticed commit dc9cdf859e11de (usb: dwc3: Add DWC3
Hi Marek,
2015-07-28 2:03 GMT+09:00 Marek Vasut :
> On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 05:37:52 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> Hi Marek, other USB guys,
>
> Hi!
>
>> I noticed commit dc9cdf859e11de (usb: dwc3: Add DWC3 controller driver
>> support) was pulled into the mainline a few days ago.
>>
>>
>> No
On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 05:37:52 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Marek, other USB guys,
Hi!
> I noticed commit dc9cdf859e11de (usb: dwc3: Add DWC3 controller driver
> support) was pulled into the mainline a few days ago.
>
>
> Now we have two drivers with similar names.
>
>
> - drivers/us
Hi Marek, other USB guys,
I noticed commit dc9cdf859e11de (usb: dwc3: Add DWC3 controller driver
support) was pulled into the mainline a few days ago.
Now we have two drivers with similar names.
- drivers/usb/dwc3/
- drivers/usb/host/xhci-dwc3.c
Are they the same hardware, or completely dif
1 - 100 of 500 matches
Mail list logo
