Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-21 Thread Tom
t; Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload >> >> Dear Jean-Christophe, >> >> in message <20090921113701.gp29...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: >>>> Atmel (AT91): Jean-Christo

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Prafulla, in message <73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e202ed512...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com> you wrote: > > > - IXP and PXA are really low traffic these days (EOL products); I > > think we can give up these repositories and just ran this through > > the generic ARM repo. > > I would love to

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-21 Thread Tom
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe, > > in message <20090921113701.gp29...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: >>> Atmel (AT91): Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard >>> >>> Marvell (PXA + IXP):Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard >> I decline it > > Thank you for

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-21 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 6:14 PM > To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RF

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe, in message <20090921113701.gp29...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > Atmel (AT91): Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard > > > > Marvell (PXA + IXP):Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard > I decline it Thank you for the clear statement. Thanks

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-21 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 23:57 Fri 04 Sep , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hello everybody, > > ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big > number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in > this area is literally exploding. This is partially due to the fact > that ARM is curr

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-07 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Wolfgang, 2009/9/7 Wolfgang Denk > Hello everybody, > > I wrote on > > | Hello everybody, > | > | ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big > | number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in > | this area is literally exploding. This is parti

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hello everybody, I wrote on | Hello everybody, | | ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big | number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in | this area is literally exploding. This is partially due to the fact | that ARM is currently used in man

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyungmin Park, In message <9c9fda240909061806j5ecc26c3ie53215e8aa017...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > > Samsung (s3c, s5pc):Are there any volunteers at Samsung? > > > > I recommended the Minky Kang. He's working for several years for > u-boot from pxa, omap3, s3c6410 and s5pc1xx

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Magnus, In message <59b21cf20909070206t189fe96bpac3cce2770b6b...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > > Freescale (i.MX) Magnus Lilja? > >Or are there any volunteers at Freescale? > > I don't have the time to handle this in a good way. It would be goo

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-07 Thread Magnus Lilja
Hi Wolfgang, 2009/9/4 Wolfgang Denk : > Hello everybody, > > After much thinking I therefor suggest to implement the following > change for the ARM architecture: > > > master ARM repository:          Tom Rix > > Atmel (AT91):                   Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard > > Freescale (i.MX)

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:plagn...@jcrosoft.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 4:48 AM > To: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Rix; Magnus Lilja; Prafulla > Wadaskar; Dirk Behme; Minkyu Kang; Kyungmin Park; Harald Welte > S

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Kyungmin Park > Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 6:36 AM > To: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang > Subject: Re: [U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hello everybody, > > ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big > number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in > this area is literally exploding.  This is partially due to the fact > that ARM is

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom, In message <4aa3bf2f.3080...@windriver.com> you wrote: > > This means an omap/davinci split ? > u-boot-arm-omap > u-boot-arm-davinci > > This is ok with me I would like to avoid this, at least for now. Let's do a first step now (split into vendor based sub-repos), and stabilize that. T

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Sandeep, In message <0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5d91e07...@dlee01.ent.ti.com> you wrote: > > This is also what we have been discussing internally within TI to have an > omap/davinci split. I'm not happy about the idea. If there really is need (or reason) to split these, I would prefer

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Tom
t is OK with the others as well. > > Thanks, > Sandeep > > From: Tom [tom@windriver.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 9:54 AM > To: Paulraj, Sandeep > Cc: Dirk Behme; Wolfgang Denk; Kyungmin Park; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus &

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
; Wolfgang Denk; Kyungmin Park; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > Wolfgang, Dirk, > > I can take responsibility for TI DaVinci SOCs. > > This means an omap/davinci split ? u-bo

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Tom
ot-boun...@lists.denx.de [u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf > Of Dirk Behme [dirk.be...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 3:39 AM > To: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: Tom Rix; Kyungmin Park; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] R

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Denk Cc: Tom Rix; Kyungmin Park; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload Dear Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Texas Instruments (OMAP): Dirk Behme? > Or are there any volunteers at

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-05 Thread Dirk Behme
Dear Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Texas Instruments (OMAP): Dirk Behme? > Or are there any volunteers at TI? I really like to see someone from TI here, instead. Looking at some past discussions, I think somebody from TI would be the best. E.g.: - While dis

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 23:57 Fri 04 Sep , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hello everybody, > > ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big > number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in > this area is literally exploding. This is partially due to the fact > that ARM is curr

[U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hello everybody, ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in this area is literally exploding. This is partially due to the fact that ARM is currently used in many designs, so many new ARM based processor