Re: [U-Boot] RFC: Alternative command name for 'tftpput'

2017-05-30 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Joe, On 30 May 2017 at 13:38, Joe Hershberger wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm stumbling again over a problem introduced with the "tftpput" >> command and its naming, as it breaks some of the old scripts that >> I and others still use. As you know

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: Alternative command name for 'tftpput'

2017-05-30 Thread Joe Hershberger
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi, > > I'm stumbling again over a problem introduced with the "tftpput" > command and its naming, as it breaks some of the old scripts that > I and others still use. As you know, when this command is enabled > (which I find quite useful from

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: Alternative command name for 'tftpput'

2017-05-23 Thread Lothar Waßmann
Stefan Roese wrote: > I'm stumbling again over a problem introduced with the "tftpput" > command and its naming, as it breaks some of the old scripts that > I and others still use. As you know, when this command is enabled > (which I find quite useful from time to time), "tftp" can't be > used an

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: Alternative command name for 'tftpput'

2017-05-22 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stefan, On 22 May 2017 at 05:55, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi, > > I'm stumbling again over a problem introduced with the "tftpput" > command and its naming, as it breaks some of the old scripts that > I and others still use. As you know, when this command is enabled > (which I find quite useful f

[U-Boot] RFC: Alternative command name for 'tftpput'

2017-05-22 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi, I'm stumbling again over a problem introduced with the "tftpput" command and its naming, as it breaks some of the old scripts that I and others still use. As you know, when this command is enabled (which I find quite useful from time to time), "tftp" can't be used any more as an shorthand for