Hi Joe, On 30 May 2017 at 13:38, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm stumbling again over a problem introduced with the "tftpput" >> command and its naming, as it breaks some of the old scripts that >> I and others still use. As you know, when this command is enabled >> (which I find quite useful from time to time), "tftp" can't be >> used any more as an shorthand for "tftpboot". >> >> What do others feel about this naming? Would it be acceptable, if >> I post a patch to rename this "tftpput" command into something >> else (e.g. netput, ethput, ...)? Or perhaps its possible to add >> an alias for the "tftpboot" command as "tftp", allowing the >> usage of all 3 commands: >> >> tftpboot: TFTP get >> tftp: TFTP get >> tftpput: TFTP put > > I'd be fine with a tftp command. Ideally we would then get rid of or > phase out tftpput and instead have a "tftp put" sub-command. > > No idea if there are now scripts that use tftpput that we want to > avoid breaking, or is it new enough / development-focused enough that > it's unlikely.
I think it is unlikely. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
