On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm stumbling again over a problem introduced with the "tftpput" > command and its naming, as it breaks some of the old scripts that > I and others still use. As you know, when this command is enabled > (which I find quite useful from time to time), "tftp" can't be > used any more as an shorthand for "tftpboot". > > What do others feel about this naming? Would it be acceptable, if > I post a patch to rename this "tftpput" command into something > else (e.g. netput, ethput, ...)? Or perhaps its possible to add > an alias for the "tftpboot" command as "tftp", allowing the > usage of all 3 commands: > > tftpboot: TFTP get > tftp: TFTP get > tftpput: TFTP put
I'd be fine with a tftp command. Ideally we would then get rid of or phase out tftpput and instead have a "tftp put" sub-command. No idea if there are now scripts that use tftpput that we want to avoid breaking, or is it new enough / development-focused enough that it's unlikely. -Joe _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
