Hi Jon,
On 6 August 2014 07:56, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>>>
>>> And these, as you said I think, are HW description things that should be
>>> included in the master DT file upstream, right?
>>
>> Well we only need them because we are added 'reg' properties to the
>> subnodes. There would certainly be
>>
>> And these, as you said I think, are HW description things that should be
>> included in the master DT file upstream, right?
>
> Well we only need them because we are added 'reg' properties to the
> subnodes. There would certainly be no harm in including them upstream.
> The only bad thing I'm
Hi Tom,
On 5 August 2014 08:07, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 02:46:02PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 4 August 2014 09:54, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 06:01:58AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> Hi Tom,
>> >>
>> >> On 30 July 2014 09:34, Simon Glass
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 02:46:02PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 4 August 2014 09:54, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 06:01:58AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> On 30 July 2014 09:34, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> > Hi Tom,
> >> >
> >> > On 28 July 2014 21:27,
Hi Tom,
On 4 August 2014 09:54, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 06:01:58AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 30 July 2014 09:34, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > Hi Tom,
>> >
>> > On 28 July 2014 21:27, Tom Rini wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 06:11:32AM -0600, Simon Glass wro
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 06:01:58AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 30 July 2014 09:34, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On 28 July 2014 21:27, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 06:11:32AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >>> The pinctrl bindings used by Linux are an i
Hi Tom,
On 30 July 2014 09:34, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 28 July 2014 21:27, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 06:11:32AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>>> The pinctrl bindings used by Linux are an incomplete description of the
>>> hardware. It is possible in most cases to dete
Hi Tom,
On 28 July 2014 21:27, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 06:11:32AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>
>> The pinctrl bindings used by Linux are an incomplete description of the
>> hardware. It is possible in most cases to determine the register address
>> of each, but not in all cases.
The pinctrl bindings used by Linux are an incomplete description of the
hardware. It is possible in most cases to determine the register address
of each, but not in all cases. By adding an additional property we can
fix this, and avoid adding a table to U-Boot for every single Exynos
SOC.
Signed-o
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 06:11:32AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> The pinctrl bindings used by Linux are an incomplete description of the
> hardware. It is possible in most cases to determine the register address
> of each, but not in all cases. By adding an additional property we can
> fix this, and
The pinctrl bindings used by Linux are an incomplete description of the
hardware. It is possible in most cases to determine the register address
of each, but not in all cases. By adding an additional property we can
fix this, and avoid adding a table to U-Boot for every single Exynos
SOC.
Signed-o
11 matches
Mail list logo
