Hi Jon, On 6 August 2014 07:56, Jon Loeliger <loeli...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> And these, as you said I think, are HW description things that should be >>> included in the master DT file upstream, right? >> >> Well we only need them because we are added 'reg' properties to the >> subnodes. There would certainly be no harm in including them upstream. >> The only bad thing I'm doing is the 'Replicate the ordering' bit. That >> should just go away once the GPIO numbering doesn't matter anymore >> (which requires that we use the device tree binding in GPIOs - this is >> the next step!). > > > HI Simon, > > I'm trying to understand what you are saying here. Specifically, is this > your solution to the GPIO renumbering problem that I've droning on and > on about?
No this is unrelated. The existing exynos4 code defines the GPIOs in a particular order, and the DT has them in a different order (and there are not aliases to change it). So it's really just a work-around until we can get away from having GPIO defines in exynos. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
