On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 06:11:32AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > The pinctrl bindings used by Linux are an incomplete description of the > hardware. It is possible in most cases to determine the register address > of each, but not in all cases. By adding an additional property we can > fix this, and avoid adding a table to U-Boot for every single Exynos > SOC.
So here's my fear..
[snip]
> @@ -49,7 +57,7 @@
> i2c@12ca0000 {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> - compatible = "samsung,s3c2440-i27c";
> + compatible = "samsung,s3c2440-i2c";
> reg = <0x12CA0000 0x100>;
> interrupts = <0 60 0>;
> };
Except for the above (what's going on? pulling in a typo fix from
upstream?) they're legal "regular" non-U-Boot-prefixed changes. Are
they going back into the master copy in Linux?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi
> b/arch/arm/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi
> index b3e63d1..df31f37 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi
> @@ -13,6 +13,18 @@
> */
>
> / {
> + /* Replicate the ordering of arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/gpio.h */
> + pinctrl@14010000 {
> + };
> + pinctrl@13400000 {
> + };
> + pinctrl@13410000 {
> + };
> + pinctrl@14000000 {
> + };
> + pinctrl@03860000 {
> + };
So this isn't going to head back to Linux, clearly...
Is there some way we can contain our changes under includes perhaps?
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
