On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:14:14PM +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
> From: Ying Zhang
>
> SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to the
> autoconf.mk Makefile. As a result the build breaks when
> CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is used in the board-specific include header file.
> With
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/19/2013 06:07 PM, York Sun wrote:
> On 08/19/2013 03:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:20:25PM -0700, York Sun wrote:
>>> On 08/19/2013 12:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: sun york-R58495
>Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 5:20 AM
>To: Tom Rini
>Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Zhang Ying-B40530; Joel A Fernandes; u-
>b...@lists.denx.de; sun york-R58495; Xie Xiaobo-R63061; Zhang Ying-B40530
>Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PA
On 08/19/2013 03:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:20:25PM -0700, York Sun wrote:
>> On 08/19/2013 12:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
> From: Ying Zha
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:20:25PM -0700, York Sun wrote:
> On 08/19/2013 12:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
> >>> From: Ying Zhang
> >>
> >> No. You added one line AFAIC
On 08/19/2013 12:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
>>> From: Ying Zhang
>>
>> No. You added one line AFAICT. Preserve the original author here.
>
> Indeed.
>
Do we need Yin
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
> > From: Ying Zhang
>
> No. You added one line AFAICT. Preserve the original author here.
Indeed.
> > SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to t
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
> From: Ying Zhang
No. You added one line AFAICT. Preserve the original author here.
> SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to the autoconf.mk
> Makefile.
> As a result the build breaks when CONFIG_SPL_BUIL
From: Ying Zhang
SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to the autoconf.mk
Makefile.
As a result the build breaks when CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is used in the
board-specific include
header file. With this, there is a possibility of having a CONFIG option
defined in the
header file bu
9 matches
Mail list logo