On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote: > From: Ying Zhang <b40...@freescale.com>
No. You added one line AFAICT. Preserve the original author here. > SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to the autoconf.mk > Makefile. > As a result the build breaks when CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is used in the > board-specific include > header file. With this, there is a possibility of having a CONFIG option > defined in the > header file but not defined in the Makefile causing all kinds of build > failure and problems. > > It also messes things for up, for example, when one might want to undefine > options to > keep the SPL small and doesn't want to be stuck with the CONFIG options used > for U-boot. > Lastly, this also avoids defining special CONFIG_SPL_ variables for cases > where some > options are required in U-boot but not in SPL. > > We add a spl-autoconf.mk rule that is generated for SPL with the > CONFIG_SPL_BUILD flag > and conditionally include it for SPL builds. > > Signed-off-by: Joel A Fernandes <joelag...@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Ying Zhang <b40...@freescale.com> > --- > Change from v4: > - No change. > Change from v3: > - No change. Surely there was *some* change or you wouldn't have reposted... -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
