On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
> From: Ying Zhang <b40...@freescale.com>

No.  You added one line AFAICT.  Preserve the original author here.

> SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to the autoconf.mk 
> Makefile.
> As a result the build breaks when CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is used in the 
> board-specific include
> header file. With this, there is a possibility of having a CONFIG option 
> defined in the
> header file but not defined in the Makefile causing all kinds of build 
> failure and problems.
> 
> It also messes things for up, for example, when one might want to undefine 
> options to
> keep the SPL small and doesn't want to be stuck with the CONFIG options used 
> for U-boot.
> Lastly, this also avoids defining special CONFIG_SPL_ variables for cases 
> where some
> options are required in U-boot but not in SPL.
> 
> We add a spl-autoconf.mk rule that is generated for SPL with the 
> CONFIG_SPL_BUILD flag
> and conditionally include it for SPL builds.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel A Fernandes <joelag...@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Zhang <b40...@freescale.com>
> ---
> Change from v4:
> - No change.
> Change from v3:
> - No change.

Surely there was *some* change or you wouldn't have reposted...

-Scott



_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to