On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote: > > From: Ying Zhang <b40...@freescale.com> > > No. You added one line AFAICT. Preserve the original author here.
Indeed. > > SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to the autoconf.mk > > Makefile. > > As a result the build breaks when CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is used in the > > board-specific include > > header file. With this, there is a possibility of having a CONFIG option > > defined in the > > header file but not defined in the Makefile causing all kinds of build > > failure and problems. > > > > It also messes things for up, for example, when one might want to undefine > > options to > > keep the SPL small and doesn't want to be stuck with the CONFIG options > > used for U-boot. > > Lastly, this also avoids defining special CONFIG_SPL_ variables for cases > > where some > > options are required in U-boot but not in SPL. > > > > We add a spl-autoconf.mk rule that is generated for SPL with the > > CONFIG_SPL_BUILD flag > > and conditionally include it for SPL builds. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel A Fernandes <joelag...@ti.com> > > Signed-off-by: Ying Zhang <b40...@freescale.com> > > --- > > Change from v4: > > - No change. > > Change from v3: > > - No change. > > Surely there was *some* change or you wouldn't have reposted... v4 was adding Joel's S-o-b line back to the changelog. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
