Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201209212124.05075.ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> Leave u-boot.bin be, that's the u-boot binary ... the new name might be u-
> boot.img (as in flash image), what do you say ?
Please re-read my earlier posting here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-
On 09/21/2012 02:24:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
> On 09/21/2012 01:43:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Scott Wood,
> >
> > > The awkwardness with naming based on nand/onenand/sd is that we
no
> > > longer have build infrastructure that is specific to the type of
> >
> > boot
Dear Scott Wood,
> On 09/21/2012 01:43:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Scott Wood,
> >
> > > The awkwardness with naming based on nand/onenand/sd is that we no
> > > longer have build infrastructure that is specific to the type of
> >
> > boot
> >
> > > device -- and IIRC with some of the ne
On 09/21/2012 01:43:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
> The awkwardness with naming based on nand/onenand/sd is that we no
> longer have build infrastructure that is specific to the type of
boot
> device -- and IIRC with some of the newer SPL targets, the same
image
> works on multi
Dear Scott Wood,
> On 09/21/2012 12:43:48 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Tom,
> >
> > In message
> > <5fbf8e85ca34454794f0f7ecba79798f379f6fd...@hqmail04.nvidia.com> you
> >
> > wrote:
> > > If you flash u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin, you'll get a fully functioning
> > > U-Boot. There's an intermediat
On 09/21/2012 12:43:48 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message
<5fbf8e85ca34454794f0f7ecba79798f379f6fd...@hqmail04.nvidia.com> you
wrote:
>
> If you flash u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin, you'll get a fully functioning
> U-Boot. There's an intermediate file (u-boot-dtb.bin) that I assume
> is u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/12 09:26, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
> On 21-09-2012 17:13, Tom Rini wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/21/12 08:52, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
>>>
>>> In message <505c21bb.7000...
Hello Tom,
Tom Rini wrote on 2012-09-21:
>> SoC specific make rules can probably be added to the respective SoC
>> specific makefiles, thus still avoiding to clutter the top level
>> Makefile with lots of conditionals.
>
> Ideally? Yes, Possible today? Not sure. I have a hazy recollection
> th
On 21-09-2012 17:13, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/12 08:52, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
In message <505c21bb.7000...@inov.pt> you wrote:
It is very important to me that we do NOT include any
architectures, SoCs, or board specifc p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/12 08:52, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
>
> In message <505c21bb.7000...@inov.pt> you wrote:
>>
>>> It is very important to me that we do NOT include any
>>> architectures, SoCs, or board specifc parts in the names
>>>
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
>
> In message <505c21bb.7000...@inov.pt> you wrote:
> > > It is very important to me that we do NOT include any architectures,
> > > SoCs, or board specifc parts in the names because this will cause
> > > major PITA for all kind of automatic test
Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
In message <505c21bb.7000...@inov.pt> you wrote:
>
> > It is very important to me that we do NOT include any architectures,
> > SoCs, or board specifc parts in the names because this will cause
> > major PITA for all kind of automatic test suites etc.
>
> To me this se
Hi Wolfgang,
On 09/21/2012 06:43 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message <5fbf8e85ca34454794f0f7ecba79798f379f6fd...@hqmail04.nvidia.com> you
wrote:
If you flash u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin, you'll get a fully functioning
U-Boot. There's an intermediate file (u-boot-dtb.bin) that I assume
is u
Dear Tom,
In message <5fbf8e85ca34454794f0f7ecba79798f379f6fd...@hqmail04.nvidia.com> you
wrote:
>
> If you flash u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin, you'll get a fully functioning
> U-Boot. There's an intermediate file (u-boot-dtb.bin) that I assume
> is u-boot.bin+dtb - I'm not sure why it's left around - Al
On 20-09-2012 19:09, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/20/2012 11:01:42 AM, Tom Warren wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@ti.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:29 PM
> To: José Miguel Gonçalves
> Cc: Scott Wood; u-boot@lists.denx.de; ma...@denx.de; mk7.k...@samsun
On 09/20/2012 11:01:42 AM, Tom Warren wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@ti.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:29 PM
> To: José Miguel Gonçalves
> Cc: Scott Wood; u-boot@lists.denx.de; ma...@denx.de;
mk7.k...@samsung.com;
> Tom Warren
> Subject: Re: [P
Tom,
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@ti.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:23 AM
> To: Tom Warren
> Cc: José Miguel Gonçalves; Scott Wood; u-boot@lists.denx.de; ma...@denx.de;
> mk7.k...@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] Add u-boot-pad.bin target to t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/20/12 09:01, Tom Warren wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@ti.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:29 PM To: José Miguel
>> Gonçalves Cc: Scott Wood; u-boot@lists.denx.de; ma...@denx.de;
>> mk7.k...@sams
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@ti.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:29 PM
> To: José Miguel Gonçalves
> Cc: Scott Wood; u-boot@lists.denx.de; ma...@denx.de; mk7.k...@samsung.com;
> Tom Warren
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] Add u-boot-pad.bin target to the Ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 17:38, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
> Tom & Scott,
>
> On 09/20/2012 12:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/19/12 16:36, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 09/19/2012 06:31:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
Tom & Scott,
On 09/20/2012 12:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 16:36, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:31:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 15:39, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, Jo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 16:36, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 06:31:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/19/12 15:39, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3
On 09/19/2012 06:31:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 15:39, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
>> Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary
>> image with a padded SPL concatenated with U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 15:39, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
>> Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary
>> image with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonç
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves
---
Changes for v2:
- None
Changes for v3:
- Changed new binary target name from u
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:36:50PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 01:19:45 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:11:08AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> >> > On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> >> On 09/19/2012 0
On 19-09-2012 19:19, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:11:08AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to
On 09/19/2012 01:19:45 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:11:08AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> > On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> >>> Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs ne
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:11:08AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> > On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> >>> Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
>
On 19-09-2012 18:08, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 11:58:06 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with
On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
> On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
>>> Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
>>> with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
>>
>> I still think "pad"
On 09/19/2012 11:58:06 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
I still think "pad" is a lous
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
I still think "pad" is a lousy name for this. It refers to a minor
implementation de
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
I still think "pad" is a lousy name for this. It refers to a minor
implementation detail of how the image was put together.
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves
---
Changes for v2:
- None
Changes for v3:
- Changed new binary target name from u-boot-ubl.bin to u-boot-pad.bin
Changes for v4:
- None
35 matches
Mail list logo
