Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mxc: Fix SDHC multi-instance clock

2012-10-10 Thread Stefano Babic
On 01/10/2012 20:36, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > On mxc, each SDHC instance has a dedicated clock, so gd->sdhc_clk is not > suitable for the multi-instance use case (initialization made directly with > fsl_esdhc_initialize()). > > This patch fixes this issue by adding a configuration field for the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mxc: Fix SDHC multi-instance clock

2012-10-09 Thread Stefano Babic
On 09/10/2012 12:35, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On Monday, October 1, 2012 8:36:25 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: >> On mxc, each SDHC instance has a dedicated clock, so gd->sdhc_clk is >> not >> suitable for the multi-instance use case (initialization made >> directly with >> fsl_es

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mxc: Fix SDHC multi-instance clock

2012-10-09 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
Hi Stefano, On Monday, October 1, 2012 8:36:25 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > On mxc, each SDHC instance has a dedicated clock, so gd->sdhc_clk is > not > suitable for the multi-instance use case (initialization made > directly with > fsl_esdhc_initialize()). > > This patch fixes this issue by ad

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mxc: Fix SDHC multi-instance clock

2012-10-01 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
On mxc, each SDHC instance has a dedicated clock, so gd->sdhc_clk is not suitable for the multi-instance use case (initialization made directly with fsl_esdhc_initialize()). This patch fixes this issue by adding a configuration field for the SDHC input clock frequency. Signed-off-by: Benoît Théba