Hi Stefano, On Monday, October 1, 2012 8:36:25 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > On mxc, each SDHC instance has a dedicated clock, so gd->sdhc_clk is > not > suitable for the multi-instance use case (initialization made > directly with > fsl_esdhc_initialize()). > > This patch fixes this issue by adding a configuration field for the > SDHC input > clock frequency. > > Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaud...@advansee.com> > Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> > Cc: Eric Bénard <e...@eukrea.com> > Cc: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com> > Cc: Jason Liu <r64...@freescale.com> > Cc: Matt Sealey <m...@genesi-usa.com> > Cc: Andy Fleming <aflem...@gmail.com> > --- > This patch should be applied after (series of series...): > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187467/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187468/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187475/ > > This patch supersedes http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187476/ . > > Changes for v2: > - Since this patch will go to /next, extend the original patch with > the mxc > boards newly added to this branch: mx6qsabreauto and mx6qsabresd.
Did you forget to apply this patch (and http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/187468/ before it) when you applied my mx5 and mx25 clock series, or is it just still in your TODO list? If you could apply them before the Nitrogen6X series (in order to avoid a v3 of this patch), I'd be grateful ;) . But if you need more review/test time, of course no problem if this is not possible. Best regards, Benoît _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
