On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 19:39:20 Graeme Russ wrote:
> Another gd related thought - Is it safe to assume that gd will be cleared?
> I hope so, as the pre-buffer console assumes gd->precon_buf_idx is
> initially zero.
i'm pretty sure you can. the Blackfin arch certainly memset's it to 0.
-mike
Hi Wolfgang
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi Simon, Mike, Wolfgang,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Simon Glass,
>>>
>>> In message
>>> you
>>> wrote:
[s
Hi Simon, Mike, Wolfgang,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Simon Glass,
>>
>> In message
>> you
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In case it is interesting (which may be unlikely) here is the code
>>> generate
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> In case it is interesting (which may be unlikely) here is the code
>> generated by my compiler (common code stripped) for your example, and
>
> Which architecture / which
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
you wrote:
>
> In case it is interesting (which may be unlikely) here is the code
> generated by my compiler (common code stripped) for your example, and
Which architecture / which compiler is this?
> one I added. It seems that % makes it worry about sign.
Indeed
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Mike Frysinger,
>
> In message <201108301558.08010.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>>
>> > Please see my previous posting
>> > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/106810)
>> >
>> > I don't think 3 additio
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201108301558.08010.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > Please see my previous posting
> > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/106810)
> >
> > I don't think 3 additional addembler instructions really play a big
> > role here.
>
> i'm pretty sur
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
> ...
>> > +#define CIRC_BUF_IDX(idx) ((idx) % CONFIG_PRE_CON_BUF_SZ)
>>
>> The division here sticks in the craw, but unless we go with
>
> Does it? Why?
Only because of t
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 15:52:38 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Simon Glass wrote:
> > > +#define CIRC_BUF_IDX(idx) ((idx) % CONFIG_PRE_CON_BUF_SZ)
> >
> > The division here sticks in the craw, but unless we go with
>
> Does it? Why?
>
> > CONFIG_PRE_CON_BUF_SZ_LOG2 then I don't see an easy way aro
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
you wrote:
>
...
> > +#define CIRC_BUF_IDX(idx) ((idx) % CONFIG_PRE_CON_BUF_SZ)
>
> The division here sticks in the craw, but unless we go with
Does it? Why?
> CONFIG_PRE_CON_BUF_SZ_LOG2 then I don't see an easy way around it, and
> since this is serial output w
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Allow redirection of console output prior to console initialisation to a
> temporary buffer.
>
> To enable this functionality, the board configuration file must define:
> - CONFIG_PRE_CONSOLE_BUFFER - Enable pre-console buffer
> -
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 08:49:41 Graeme Russ wrote:
> - if (!gd->have_console)
> + if (!gd->have_console) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRE_CONSOLE_BUFFER
> + pre_console_putc(c);
> +#endif
> return;
> + }
add inline stubs for the pre_console_xxx helpers and you can
Allow redirection of console output prior to console initialisation to a
temporary buffer.
To enable this functionality, the board configuration file must define:
- CONFIG_PRE_CONSOLE_BUFFER - Enable pre-console buffer
- CONFIG_PRE_CON_BUF_ADDR - Base address of pre-console buffer
- CONFIG_PRE_
13 matches
Mail list logo
