Hi Wolfgang On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Graeme Russ <graeme.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, Mike, Wolfgang, > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: >>> Dear Simon Glass, >>> >>> In message >>> <CAPnjgZ1dQXMVeFk47=gg5y+tchg7wtdgk0b1wjsqobhu2d0...@mail.gmail.com> you >>> wrote: >>>>
[snip] > > Getting back to gd for a sec - This patch (like the flagify patch set I > posted before) impacts the structure of gd. Does this trigger in increment > to the API Version? And as observed before, if the structure of gd is > fixed for any given API version, then we have a problem with all the > #ifdef's that are already in gd. If it _is_ the case that the API version > expects a particular fixed structure for gd, then maybe we need to remove > all the #ifdefs from gd - Yes it will lead to a few dead ulongs for a few > boards, but I don't see any practical alternatives. I did think about > looking at doing some kind of CRC on the gd struct (like the generated > asm-offsets), but I could not think of a way to do it) Another gd related thought - Is it safe to assume that gd will be cleared? I hope so, as the pre-buffer console assumes gd->precon_buf_idx is initially zero. Regards, Graeme _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
