* Wolfgang Denk | 2011-09-17 15:10:31 [+0200]:
>Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
Hi Wolfgang,
>In message <4e73bf68.9040...@linutronix.de> you wrote:
>>
>> > Are you 100% sure this is a GPLv2+ compatible license??? I don't think
>> > so...
>>
>> How so? This is a 3-clause BSD license. According t
On Saturday, September 17, 2011 15:33:40 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 09/17/2011 03:10 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >>> Are you 100% sure this is a GPLv2+ compatible license??? I don't think
> >>> so...
> >>
> >> How so? This is a 3-clause BSD license. A
On 09/17/2011 03:10 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
Hi Wolfgang,
> In message<4e73bf68.9040...@linutronix.de> you wrote:
>>
>>> Are you 100% sure this is a GPLv2+ compatible license??? I don't think
>>> so...
>>
>> How so? This is a 3-clause BSD license. According to [0
Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
In message <4e73bf68.9040...@linutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> > Are you 100% sure this is a GPLv2+ compatible license??? I don't think
> > so...
>
> How so? This is a 3-clause BSD license. According to [0] it is
> compatible. Is there anything I missed here?
The "All
On 09/16/2011 11:35 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2011 17:28:08 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> On 09/16/2011 11:03 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project
+ * All rights reserved.
On Friday, September 16, 2011 17:28:08 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 09/16/2011 11:03 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project
> >> + * All rights reserved.
> >> + *
> >> + * Redistribution and use in source and
On 09/16/2011 11:03 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
Hi Wolfgang,
>> + * Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project
>> + * All rights reserved.
>> + *
>> + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>> + * modification, are permitted prov
Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
In message <1316191879-27214-2-git-send-email-bige...@linutronix.de> you wrote:
> This patch adds support for the Android boot-image format. The header
> file is from the Android project and got slightly alterted so the struct +
> its defines are not generic but hav
On 09/16/2011 08:22 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:51:17 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE
>
> we already have a standard here: CONFIG_BOOTM_ANDROID
Ehm. Can't follow. If you want me to s/CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE
/CONFIG_BOOTM_ANDR
On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:51:17 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE
we already have a standard here: CONFIG_BOOTM_ANDROID
> +static u32 andoir_img_get_kload(struct andr_img_hdr *hdr)
looks like you missed a "d" in that "andoir"
-mike
signature.asc
Descri
This patch adds support for the Android boot-image format. The header
file is from the Android project and got slightly alterted so the struct +
its defines are not generic but have something like a namespace. The
header file is from bootloader/legacy/include/boot/bootimg.h. The header
parsing has
11 matches
Mail list logo
