On Saturday, September 17, 2011 15:33:40 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 09/17/2011 03:10 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >>> Are you 100% sure this is a GPLv2+ compatible license??? I don't think > >>> so... > >> > >> How so? This is a 3-clause BSD license. According to [0] it is > >> compatible. Is there anything I missed here? > > > > The "All rights reserved." clause doesn't fit. > > Are you sure? This type of license matches the FreeBSD license [0] > (including the "All rights reserved" statement) and the FSF says that > it is compatible with the GPL license [1]. > I also see this in tools/fit_image.c which is GPLv2 or later and in > include/elf.h which is a 3-clause BSD license. > So why does it not fit in here?
the phrase is meaningless cruft nowadays: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Rights_Reserved -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
