On 04/23/14 22:00, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 04/23/2014 10:07 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Tim, hi Nikita,
>>
>> On 10/04/2014 16:08, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
>>
The cfg files are currently all written to use the IOMUX register
names as MX6_ (no Q vs DL) so that a single c
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tim, hi Nikita,
>
> On 10/04/2014 16:08, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
>
>>> The cfg files are currently all written to use the IOMUX register
>>> names as MX6_ (no Q vs DL) so that a single cfg file can be used for a
>>> build-time configurati
Hi Stefano,
On 04/23/2014 10:07 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Tim, hi Nikita,
On 10/04/2014 16:08, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
The cfg files are currently all written to use the IOMUX register
names as MX6_ (no Q vs DL) so that a single cfg file can be used for a
build-time configuration of IMX6Q o
Hi Tim, hi Nikita,
On 10/04/2014 16:08, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
>> The cfg files are currently all written to use the IOMUX register
>> names as MX6_ (no Q vs DL) so that a single cfg file can be used for a
>> build-time configuration of IMX6Q or IMX6DL.
>
> OK now I understand. It seems to me t
Hi Tim,
On 09/04/2014 17:46, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>>
>> On 04/03/2014 09:01 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>>
>>> This is an attempt at using a macro to allow mx6dl-ddr.h and
>>> mx6q-ddr.h registers to be used together which is needed f
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 05:08 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
>
> Here I'm referring to the file arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6_ddr_regs.h
> (which I'm guessing you may have already seen based on your comment on
> patch 11...)
>
Nikita,
Yes, I start
On 04/10/2014 05:08 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
On 04/09/2014 06:46 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Nikita Kiryanov
wrote:
Hi Tim,
On 04/03/2014 09:01 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
This is an attempt at using a macro to allow mx6dl-ddr.h and
mx6q-ddr.h registers to be used tog
On 04/09/2014 06:46 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
Hi Tim,
On 04/03/2014 09:01 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
This is an attempt at using a macro to allow mx6dl-ddr.h and
mx6q-ddr.h registers to be used together which is needed for an SPL
bootloader
that
Hi Tim,
On 04/03/2014 09:01 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
This is an attempt at using a macro to allow mx6dl-ddr.h and
mx6q-ddr.h registers to be used together which is needed for an SPL bootloader
that can run on either CPU's and must configure MMDC iomux dynamically.
I am trying to come up with a sol
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
>
> On 04/03/2014 09:01 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>
>> This is an attempt at using a macro to allow mx6dl-ddr.h and
>> mx6q-ddr.h registers to be used together which is needed for an SPL
>> bootloader
>> that can run on either CPU's a
This is an attempt at using a macro to allow mx6dl-ddr.h and
mx6q-ddr.h registers to be used together which is needed for an SPL bootloader
that can run on either CPU's and must configure MMDC iomux dynamically.
I am trying to come up with a solution similar to Eric's approach with the
similar iss
11 matches
Mail list logo
