On Tuesday 28 February 2017 10:36 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
> R, Vignesh wrote:
>> On 2/28/2017 8:38 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> This also works.
>>>
>>> Marek - how do you feel about a patch series with the following:
>>>
>>> 1. revert commit 57897c13de03ac0136d64641a3eab526c68103
R, Vignesh wrote:
> On 2/28/2017 8:38 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> This also works.
>>
>> Marek - how do you feel about a patch series with the following:
>>
>> 1. revert commit 57897c13de03ac0136d64641a3eab526c6810387
>> spi: cadence_qspi_apb: Use 32 bit indirect write transaction
On 2/28/2017 8:38 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
[...]
>
> This also works.
>
> Marek - how do you feel about a patch series with the following:
>
> 1. revert commit 57897c13de03ac0136d64641a3eab526c6810387
> spi: cadence_qspi_apb: Use 32 bit indirect write transaction when
> possible
> 2. re
I don't know if this message successfully sent last weekend. My mail server
was undergoing maintenance, and I didn't see my original message on the u-boot
mailing list archive. So I'm resending, my apologies if this is a repost.
R, Vignesh wrote:
> On 2/25/2017 1:25 AM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
>
On 2/25/2017 1:25 AM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
> R, Vignesh wrote:
>> On 2/24/2017 12:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2017 08:22 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 02/22/2017 06:37 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
>> Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 02/21/2017 05:50 PM, Rush,
R, Vignesh wrote:
> On 2/24/2017 12:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 02/23/2017 08:22 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
>>> Marek Vasut wrote:
On 02/22/2017 06:37 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
> Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 02/21/2017 05:50 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
> [...]
>>>
>>> While I was debuggin
On 2/24/2017 12:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 02/23/2017 08:22 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
>> Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 02/22/2017 06:37 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 05:50 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
[...]
>>
>> While I was debugging some of my changes, I not
On 02/23/2017 08:22 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
> Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 02/22/2017 06:37 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
>>> Marek Vasut wrote:
On 02/21/2017 05:50 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
> The socfpga arch uses a different value for the indaddrtrig reg than
> the ahbbase address. Adoptin
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 02/22/2017 06:37 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
>> Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 02/21/2017 05:50 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
The socfpga arch uses a different value for the indaddrtrig reg than
the ahbbase address. Adopting the Linux DT bindings separates the
ahbbase an
On 02/22/2017 06:37 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
> Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 02/21/2017 05:50 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
>>> The socfpga arch uses a different value for the indaddrtrig reg than
>>> the ahbbase address. Adopting the Linux DT bindings separates the
>>> ahbbase and trigger-base addresses,
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 05:50 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
>> The socfpga arch uses a different value for the indaddrtrig reg than
>> the ahbbase address. Adopting the Linux DT bindings separates the
>> ahbbase and trigger-base addresses, allowing the trigger-base to be+
>> set correctly on
On 02/21/2017 05:50 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
> The socfpga arch uses a different value for the indaddrtrig reg than
> the ahbbase address. Adopting the Linux DT bindings separates the
> ahbbase and trigger-base addresses, allowing the trigger-base to be+
> set correctly on the socfpga arch.
>
> T
On Tuesday 21 February 2017 10:20 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
> The socfpga arch uses a different value for the indaddrtrig reg than
> the ahbbase address. Adopting the Linux DT bindings separates the
> ahbbase and trigger-base addresses, allowing the trigger-base to be+
> set correctly on the socf
The socfpga arch uses a different value for the indaddrtrig reg than
the ahbbase address. Adopting the Linux DT bindings separates the
ahbbase and trigger-base addresses, allowing the trigger-base to be+
set correctly on the socfpga arch.
Tested on Terasic SoCkit dev board (Altera Cyclone V)
Sign
14 matches
Mail list logo