On 09/23/2015 12:48 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
> I2C1 can work on ls102xa rev2.0 SD boot, so add
> ID EEPROM for SD boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao
> ---
Applied to u-boot-fsl-qoriq. Awaiting upstream. Thanks.
York
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.
That's good. Thanks.
York
Original message
From: Yuan Yao-B46683
Date:10/20/2015 8:59 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Sun York-R58495 , si...@writeme.com, Wang Huan-B18965
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD boot
Hi yor
Sun [mailto:york...@freescale.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 11:02 PM
> To: si...@writeme.com; Yuan Yao-B46683 ; Wang
> Huan-B18965
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD
> boot
>
>
>
> On 10/19/2
On 10/19/2015 04:14 AM, Sinan Akman wrote:
>
>Hi Yuan
>
> On 19/10/15 05:21 AM, Yao Yuan wrote:
>> Hi Sinan Akman,
>>
>> Yes, I mean the Rev 1.0 silicon.
>> Sorry, I can't guarantee that there aren't any boards with Rev1.0 silicon
>> are in user's hands.
>> Because we have also delivery ve
to break this.
Regards
Sinan Akman
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Yuan Yao
-Original Message-
From: Sinan Akman [mailto:si...@writeme.com]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:37 AM
To: Sun York-R58495 ; Yuan Yao-B46683
; Wang Huan-B18965
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] conf
-B18965
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: ls1021atwr: Enable ID EEPROM for SD
> boot
>
>
>Hi Yuan
>
> On 15/10/15 12:40 PM, York Sun wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/15/2015 12:55 AM, Yuan Yao-B46683 wrote:
> >> Hi york
Hi Yuan
On 15/10/15 12:40 PM, York Sun wrote:
On 10/15/2015 12:55 AM, Yuan Yao-B46683 wrote:
Hi york,
The earlier SoC is just LS1021a rev1.0, but rev1.0 haven't delivery to the
customer.
Also the rev1.0 has since gone out of production.
So we don't have necessary to support rev1.0 becaus
On 10/15/2015 12:55 AM, Yuan Yao-B46683 wrote:
> Hi york,
>
> The earlier SoC is just LS1021a rev1.0, but rev1.0 haven't delivery to the
> customer.
> Also the rev1.0 has since gone out of production.
> So we don't have necessary to support rev1.0 because no one will or possibly
> to use rev1.
Hi york,
The earlier SoC is just LS1021a rev1.0, but rev1.0 haven't delivery to the
customer.
Also the rev1.0 has since gone out of production.
So we don't have necessary to support rev1.0 because no one will or possibly to
use rev1.0.
Best Regards,
Yuan Yao
> -Original Message-
> From
On 09/23/2015 12:48 AM, Yuan Yao wrote:
> I2C1 can work on ls102xa rev2.0 SD boot, so add
> ID EEPROM for SD boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao
> ---
> include/configs/ls1021atwr.h | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/configs/ls1021atwr.h b/include/configs/ls1021atwr
I2C1 can work on ls102xa rev2.0 SD boot, so add
ID EEPROM for SD boot.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao
---
include/configs/ls1021atwr.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/ls1021atwr.h b/include/configs/ls1021atwr.h
index 7dcb719..59e704e 100644
--- a/include/configs/ls1
11 matches
Mail list logo
