The patch fixes the bug of partial initialization of global network
parameters.
Upon u-boot's start up the first ping command causes a failure of the
consequent TFTP command. It happens in the recently added mechanism of
the NetLoop initialization where initialization of global network
parameters
Hi Ben,
Ben Warren wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Zaidman wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Ben Warren
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I tried to apply it but it didn't work, but this isn't my usual computer.
>>> I'll try on my other machine tonight. BTW - what mailer are you u
The patch fixes the bug of partial initialization of global network
parameters.
Upon u-boot's start up the first ping command causes a failure of the
consequent TFTP command. It happens in the recently added mechanism of
the NetLoop initialization where initialization of global network
parameters
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Michael & Ben,
>
> In message <660c0f820904031320s392b010bx8796823194bcd...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>
>> I used Firefox as front-end web interface to communicate with gmail
>> server - the only option I have at my work place. It obviously caused
>> the problem.
Hi Michael,
Michael Zaidman wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Ben Warren wrote:
>
>> I tried to apply it but it didn't work, but this isn't my usual computer.
>> I'll try on my other machine tonight. BTW - what mailer are you using?
>>
>>
> I used Firefox as front-en
Dear Michael & Ben,
In message <660c0f820904031320s392b010bx8796823194bcd...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> I used Firefox as front-end web interface to communicate with gmail
> server - the only option I have at my work place. It obviously caused
> the problem. The http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/E
Hi Ben,
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Ben Warren wrote:
>
> I tried to apply it but it didn't work, but this isn't my usual computer.
> I'll try on my other machine tonight. BTW - what mailer are you using?
>
I used Firefox as front-end web interface to communicate with gmail
server - the on
Dear Ben Warren,
In message <49d5338c.1050...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > Could you please do an additional try to apply the patch produced
> > with git-format-patch. I hope it is OK now.
> >
> I tried to apply it but it didn't work, but this isn't my usual
> computer. I'll try on my other
Hi Michael,
Michael Zaidman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
>
>
>>> I have to enable the git operation via gmail on my workstation.
>>>
>> What do you mean by this? Usually you only need a mailer which is
>> capable to attach things inline. Even better -
to apply the patch produced
with git-format-patch. I hope it is OK now.
Thanks,
Michael
>From 774a3d83c4363a0bbeb0616786f522877882c88b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Zaidman
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 18:25:03 +0300
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NetLoop initialization bug
The patch fixes the
Hi Michael,
> Sorry for the previous mail,
> I have to enable the git operation via gmail on my workstation.
What do you mean by this? Usually you only need a mailer which is
capable to attach things inline. Even better - if you have a direct
access to an mta or an smtp server, use git-send-ema
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Michael,
[...]
> The patch in your mail does still not apply. Neither git-am (after
> fixing the patch with a valid e-mail) nor patch can do anything with it.
>
> Thanks
> Detlev
>
Sorry for the previous mail,
I have to enable the g
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> Please see my comments and updated patch below.
>
> As a side note, please send your patch as an inline attachment also
> adding your signed-off-by line. It's probably easiest to actually use
> git to apply your changes to
Hi Michael,
> Please see my comments and updated patch below.
As a side note, please send your patch as an inline attachment also
adding your signed-off-by line. It's probably easiest to actually use
git to apply your changes to a branch and use "git-format-patch" to
create the patch.
Please al
"
> On the other hand you are right - we do not need to clear the NetOurIP
> address for BOOTP, DHCP and RARP because the current implementation
> does not check it. So it has been removed in my new patch below.
thanks.
> Here is the updated patch:
>
> Subject
oot-2009.03 introduced bug I have described
>> below a few days ago. Could you please take a look at
>> the proposed fix?
>>
>
> Sorry, seems I missed it.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Michael
>>
>> -- Forwarded message ------
>> From: Michael Za
Dear Heiko,
In message <49d054ba.1060...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> The following 2 vars are just used, if CONFIG_CMD_CDP
> is used, can we do a "#if defined" around it?
> > + NetOurNativeVLAN = getenv_VLAN("nvlan");
> > + NetOurVLAN = getenv_VLAN("vlan");
We probably could, but we then
missed it.
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Michael Zaidman
> Date: Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:35 PM
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NetLoop initialization bug
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>
>
> [U-Boot] [PATCH] NetLoop initialization bug
2, 2009 at 8:35 PM
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NetLoop initialization bug
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
[U-Boot] [PATCH] NetLoop initialization bug
Upon u-boot's start up the first ping command causes a failure of the
consequent TFTP command. It happens in the recently added mechanism
[U-Boot] [PATCH] NetLoop initialization bug
Upon u-boot's start up the first ping command causes a failure of the
consequent TFTP command. It happens in the recently added mechanism of
the NetLoop initialization where initialization of global network parameters is
separated in the NetIni
20 matches
Mail list logo
