Hi Simon,
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 09:47:03AM +, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 9:17???AM Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 20. Dezember 2023 05:46:16 MEZ schrieb Simon Glass :
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 17:17, AKASHI Takahiro
> >
Hi Heinrich,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 9:17 AM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 20. Dezember 2023 05:46:16 MEZ schrieb Simon Glass :
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 17:17, AKASHI Takahiro
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Simon,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 08:01:46AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 10:23:35AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 12/18/23 03:38, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Now it is clear that the feature actually depends on efi interfaces,
> > not "bootefi" command. efi_set_bootdev() will automatically be nullified
> > if necessary efi component is di
On 12/18/23 03:38, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Now it is clear that the feature actually depends on efi interfaces,
not "bootefi" command. efi_set_bootdev() will automatically be nullified
if necessary efi component is disabled.
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro
---
net/tftp.c | 10 --
1 fil
Am 20. Dezember 2023 05:46:16 MEZ schrieb Simon Glass :
>Hi,
>
>On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 17:17, AKASHI Takahiro
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 08:01:46AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > Hi AKASHI,
>> >
>> > On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 19:39, AKASHI Takahiro
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>>
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 17:17, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 08:01:46AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi AKASHI,
> >
> > On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 19:39, AKASHI Takahiro
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Now it is clear that the feature actually depends on efi interfaces,
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 08:01:46AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi AKASHI,
>
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 19:39, AKASHI Takahiro
> wrote:
> >
> > Now it is clear that the feature actually depends on efi interfaces,
> > not "bootefi" command. efi_set_bootdev() will automatically be nullified
Hi AKASHI,
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 19:39, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
>
> Now it is clear that the feature actually depends on efi interfaces,
> not "bootefi" command. efi_set_bootdev() will automatically be nullified
> if necessary efi component is disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro
> ---
>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 5:17 AM AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
>
> Now it is clear that the feature actually depends on efi interfaces,
> not "bootefi" command. efi_set_bootdev() will automatically be nullified
> if necessary efi component is disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro
> ---
> net/tftp
Now it is clear that the feature actually depends on efi interfaces,
not "bootefi" command. efi_set_bootdev() will automatically be nullified
if necessary efi component is disabled.
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro
---
net/tftp.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
di
10 matches
Mail list logo