Re: [PATCH 13/14] lmb: Mark arch_lmb_reserve() as weak symbol

On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 06:46:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 8/15/21 9:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > Mark arch_lmb_reserve() weak on architecture level, so it can be > > > overridden if necessary. This might be necessary if t

Re: [PATCH 13/14] lmb: Mark arch_lmb_reserve() as weak symbol

On 8/15/21 9:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: Mark arch_lmb_reserve() weak on architecture level, so it can be overridden if necessary. This might be necessary if there is some sort of architectural exception where e.g. more LMB areas have to b

Re: [PATCH 13/14] lmb: Mark arch_lmb_reserve() as weak symbol

On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Mark arch_lmb_reserve() weak on architecture level, so it can be > overridden if necessary. This might be necessary if there is some > sort of architectural exception where e.g. more LMB areas have to > be reserved. > > Note that sand

[PATCH 13/14] lmb: Mark arch_lmb_reserve() as weak symbol

Mark arch_lmb_reserve() weak on architecture level, so it can be overridden if necessary. This might be necessary if there is some sort of architectural exception where e.g. more LMB areas have to be reserved. Note that sandbox now needs an empty implementation of arch_lmb_reserve(). Signed-off-b