On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 06:46:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 8/15/21 9:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > Mark arch_lmb_reserve() weak on architecture level, so it can be > > > overridden if necessary. This might be necessary if there is some > > > sort of architectural exception where e.g. more LMB areas have to > > > be reserved. > > > > > > Note that sandbox now needs an empty implementation of > > > arch_lmb_reserve(). > > > > I'm not sure we need this. We have the arch and board call-outs, and > > I've already addressed the imx example. I really want to see how this > > works on the I believe you've said rcar example. > > Since they disable relocation in the bsp too, gd->ram_top would be replaced > by fixed value there. I can skip this patch for now.
OK. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
