On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Mark arch_lmb_reserve() weak on architecture level, so it can be > overridden if necessary. This might be necessary if there is some > sort of architectural exception where e.g. more LMB areas have to > be reserved. > > Note that sandbox now needs an empty implementation of > arch_lmb_reserve().
I'm not sure we need this. We have the arch and board call-outs, and I've already addressed the imx example. I really want to see how this works on the I believe you've said rcar example. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
