On Tuesday, November 18, 2014, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 18.11.2014 09:08, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
>> Add me for UBI custodian.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
>>
>
> Acked-by: Stefan Roese
Acked-by:
job!
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
> Cc: Lukasz Majewski
> Cc: Piotr Wilczek
> Cc: Kyungmin Park
> Cc: Lukasz Dalek
> Cc: Marek Vasut
> ---
>
> Just did a build test on u-boot-usb/master branch.
> Need to be tested further.
>
&
nse for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston,
> + * MA 02111-1307 USA
> + */
> +#include
> +#include
On 1/2/13, Rajeshwari Birje wrote:
> Hi Kyungmin Park,
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Kyungmin Park
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 1/2/13, Rajeshwari Birje wrote:
>>> Hi Kyungmin Park,
>>>
>>> Thank you for comments.
>>>
>>
Hi,
On 1/2/13, Rajeshwari Birje wrote:
> Hi Kyungmin Park,
>
> Thank you for comments.
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Kyungmin Park
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Rajeshwari Shinde
>> wrote:
>>> This patch converts lowlevel_init.
NOS5_DWMMC, /* Exynos5 DWMMC controller */
You already know that exynos4 series also have DWMMC controller and
it's strange to use this value at exynos4 series.
so can you use 'SAMSUNG_EXYNOS_DWMMC'?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
>
> COMPAT_COUNT,
> };
> diff --git a
ese can be uses other exynos5250 series. so can you place it common
header file?
> +
> /* TZPC : Register Offsets */
> #define TZPC0_BASE 0x1010
> #define TZPC1_BASE 0x1011
> @@ -539,7 +544,8 @@ enum {
> * accesses; may vary acr
gt; > + s5p_gpio_set_value(&gpio1->b2, 0, 1);
> > +
> > + /* LCD power on */
> > + s5p_gpio_cfg_pin(&gpio1->x1, 5, GPIO_OUTPUT);
> > + s5p_gpio_set_value(&gpio1->x1, 5, 1);
> > +
> > + /* Set Hotplug detect f
io_set_value(&gpio1->x1, 5, 1);
> +
> + /* Set Hotplug detect for DP */
> + s5p_gpio_cfg_pin(&gpio1->x0, 7, GPIO_FUNC(0x3));
It should be SMDK5250 specific codes, it can't located at common file.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
> +}
> +
> static int exynos5
Since only exynos5250 is mainlined at this time.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
>
> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala
> Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c | 148 +
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/gpio.h | 360
>
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Rajeshwari Birje
wrote:
> Hi Kyungmin Park,
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Rajeshwari Shinde
>> wrote:
>>> This patch sets pinmux for VBus of USB.
>>>
>>
S power switch */
> + s5p_gpio_direction_output(&gpio1->x2,6, 1);
it seems to be board specific GPIO value. doesn't it?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
> +}
> +
> static int exynos5_pinmux_config(int peripheral, int flags)
> {
> switch (peripheral) {
> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2\n" : : "r"(val));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Sets L2 cache related parameters before enabling data cache
> + */
> +void v7_outer_cache_enable(void)
> +{
if (soc_is_exynos5250())
> + exynos5_set_l2cache
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Vasanth Ananthan
wrote:
> This patch adds the macro definition of SATA controller and PHY controller
> base addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasanth Ananthan
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h|3 +++
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/perip
FYI: Piotr and Lukasz are working together for samsung board.
Minkyu, can you pick up this patch?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.b...@aribaud.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 2:07 AM
> To: Piotr Wilczek
; > problem with that :-).
>> > >
>> > > I will fix Trats ASAP.
>> >
>> > I've just tested TRATS with the newest origin/master
>> > (SHA1: 4668a086bb0a769b741e3a4ffab85f1c41c7cdb8 )
>> >
>> > It builds without errors/warinig
f CONFIG_EXYNOS4210
> unsigned char res52[0x4];
> unsigned intmpll_lock;
> +#else
> + unsigned char res52[0x8];
> +#endif
> unsigned char res53[0xf4];
> unsigned intapll_con0;
> unsigned intapll_con1;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EX
On 8/10/12, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Donghwa Lee,
>
> In message <4fa08f0a.6040...@samsung.com> you wrote:
>> This patch manipulates GUID Papartition Tables.
>> I send this patch on behalf of Gwuieon Jin.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gwuieon Jin
>>
On 5/14/12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 14 May 2012 01:37:10 Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> On 5/14/12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > On Thursday 10 May 2012 01:23:40 Donghwa Lee wrote:
>> >> Makefile |1 +
>> >> include/libtiz
(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += $(COBJS-libfdt)
COBJS-$(CONFIG_FIT) += $(COBJS-libfdt)
>
> also, where are the boards that actually use this ?
board/samsung/trats uses this logo.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi,
Can you share the purpose of USB host support at bootloader?
Just curious.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On 5/2/12, Rajeshwari Shinde wrote:
> This patchset series adds support to enable USB 2.0 on smdk5250.
> It includes addition of system and power management registers,
> functions
+ Minkyu,
On 5/3/12, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Rajeshwari Shinde,
>
>> This patch add structure for SYSREG.
>
> Ccing Minkyu. Can I get your opinion on these patches please?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Che-Liang Chiou
>> Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde
>> Reviewed-by: Vivek Gautam
>> Reviewed-by:
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
Maybe some debug codes are included.
On 3/26/12, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:34:07 +0900
> Kyungmin Park wrote:
> ...
>> > Hmm, emails to dg77@samsung.com address are now rejected:
>> > Recipient address rejected
ally part of
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/121847
>>
>> Reported-by: Donggeun Kim
>> Cc: Kyungmin Park
>> ---
>> README |8 +-
>> common/cmd_fat.c | 57
>> +
tzpc {
> +struct s5p_tzpc {
I think 'exynos' is preferable. Even though each SOC has different
number of tzpc. It can be covered one exynos_tzpc. or we can define
it for each SoC.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
> unsigned int r0size;
> char res1[0x7FC];
> un
27;s almost fixed and no more new features.
These patches are syncing internal tree with mainline one. and no more changes.
So please until this time, handle this patches.
Next time, Mr. Kang handle both samsung and onenand together.
How do you think?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
>
>
> +
>>
>> Are you planning to reimplement most of these two files in C as per
>> Wolfgang's comments on the TRATS board, or is that a separate issue?
> Not as of now. We have 14K for spl. Using C style it might not fit into
> that.
I
Hi,
New Cortex-A15 also uses the armv7. So it's better to use the exynos itself.
Just remove the number 4.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On 11/25/11, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> As per new conventions Samsung SoC's are named as Exynos.
> Cortex-A9 based Soc's are named as exynos4.
ung.c
>> index 20b4912..1f4bd81 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
>> @@ -590,6 +590,16 @@ static void s3c_set_width_regs(struct onenand_chip
>> *this) }
>> #endif
>>
>> +int s5pc110_chip_probe(struct m
Hi all,
Marek, did you see the onenand_ipl/onenand_read.c at u-boot? It's already
implemented and used for OneNAND boot.
How do you think migrate this file into generic SPL framework?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
-Original Message-
From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marek.va...@gmail.com]
Poeschel
> Cc: Kyungmin Park
> ---
> The message I got before u-boot freezes:
> UBI: max/mean erase counter: 53/32
> UBIFS: mounted UBI device 0, volume 1, name "rootfs"
> UBIFS: mounted read-only
> UBIFS: file system size: 49140 bytes (50319360 KiB, 0 MiB, 49140 LEBs)
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:58 PM, V, Aneesh wrote:
> Hi Kyungmin Park,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
>> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Kyungmin Park
>> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:05 AM
>> To:
2010/11/11 Måns Rullgård :
> Kyungmin Park writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now I'm trying to use the NEON instruction at u-boot. but it's failed
>> and got the data abort.
>> Are there any way to use the NEON instruction at u-boot?
>
> No, just like you
ts aligned
vld4.8 {d0[0], d1[0], d2[0], d3[0]}, [r1]!
vst4.8 {d0[0], d1[0], d2[0], d3[0]}, [r0, :32]!
1: bcc 2f
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra
wrote:
> This patch adds the Numonyx manufacturer code (0x20) to
> onenand manufacturers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra
> ---
> drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c | 1 +
&g
Hi,
I tested it with the latest u-boot codes. and without OneNAND patch,
it's boot and working well.
Of course I used the relocation method at u-boot.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dne Po 4. října 2010 23:18:51 Scott Wood napsal(a):
>
code at OneNAND directly. It's the reason do you need
to fixup.
I'll prepare the patches to fix this issue. So don't delete the codes.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
-Original Message-
From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marek.va...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 8:34 AM
To
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> This allows to specify where the OneNAND IPL should load the U-Boot binary.
> The
> purpose of CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR is different I believe.
>
> On PXA, this is needed with OneNAND memories that expose
Hi,
No it's used another place. that's reason not static function pointer.
I'll update it soon.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> There apparantly is no reason for having "onenand_read_page" abstracted.
> Besides
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kyungmin Park,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>>
>> There's request from other team. They want to transfer the binary but
>> it's written as ubifs filesystem.
>> So download the binary
t; + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 1996-2005 Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
>> + *
>> + * The full LZO package can be found at:
>> + * http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
>> + *
>> + * Changed for kernel use by:
>> + * Nitin Gupta
>> + * Richard Purdi
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Kyungmin,
>
> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 16:18:00 Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> >> This looks promising. However, our SPL has to load u-boot from MMC. Is
>> >> it OK to keep it under nand_spl directory or shou
irectory structure,
>
> ONENAND_spl does seem to based on xloader from the info by the author in the
> source code.
Right, First OneNAND IPL based on x-loader and used for OMAP2 board.
and I integrate it into u-boot as onenand_ipl.
To reduce the code size, I introduced the CONFIG_ONENAND_IPL and
som
gh.
>>
>> This looks promising. However, our SPL has to load u-boot from MMC. Is
>> it OK to keep it under nand_spl directory or should we create
>> something like 'mmc_spl'?
Good question, It created the mmc_ipl and use it for mmc booting e.g.,
eMMC boot.
>
>
L (2KiB, 8KiB or 16KiB) combined with u-boot.bin and
generate u-boot-onenand.bin
OneNAND IPL (at SRAM) load the u-boot.bin to DRAM and jump to u-boot address.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
a Windows XP-embedded
> host (http://www.thesycon.de/eng/usb_cdcecm.shtml). CDC works much
> more stable, and much more faster compared to rndis.
We also implemented the CDC and RNDIS on our board and working well.
If you merge your usb gadget tree then we will send the patches also.
To
lity was broken.
Signed-off-by: Peter Horton
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
index 1afc61e..4004402 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
@@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ static int init
nctionality was broken.
Signed-off-by: Peter Horton
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
index 1afc61e..4004402 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
@@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ static int init
Deal all,
Sent.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kyungmin & Stefan,K
>
> In message
> Karl Beldan wrote:
>>
>> I suggest someone apply commit ff99879 from Linux.
>
> I think this is a good idea. If yo
MAP3EVM. I hope it should work just fine on Beagle as well.
>
> Will it be ok if I submit those patches to Denx's tree? Is there anyone
> Already working on this?
Good news, can you post it? we just start to implement it s5pc110. we
hope to use it.
Thank you,
Kyungmin
Hi,
My bet is goni. Since it's new GPIO based board.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
> -Original Message-
> From: Minkyu Kang [mailto:proms...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 12:38 PM
> To: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; 박경민
> Subject: Re: Support
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dne Ne 2. května 2010 05:54:41 Kyungmin Park napsal(a):
>> Hi,
>>
>> Which CPU do you use? In most ARM cpu, CPU load the IPL into its
>> internal SRAM, and runs at here.
> PXA270 ... the BootRAM is mapped to 0x
_BASE
#define ONENAND_IPL_TEXT_BASE BOARD_IPL_TEXT_BASE
#endif
load IPL code ONENAND_IPL_TEXT_BASE instead of current code.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've been tinkering with OneNAND IPL in uboot. I found out it wan't
Hi,
We got the several samsung SoC board, just send your patch and can
test it with our board
And current samsung SoC maintainer for u-boot is Minkyu Kang.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Naveen Krishna Ch
wrote:
> Hi Liakhovetski,
>
> I learnt you maint
H Scott,
If you you don't mind, I'm okay to this patch. Can you merge it?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Amul Kumar Saha wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
>>> +static loff_t flexonenand_addr(struct onenand_chip *this, int block)
>>> +{
>&
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:27:10PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> Now OneNAND handles block operation only.
>> With this patch OneNAND handles all read/write size.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
>> ---
>
Hi,
If you use the gmail, Select the raw message, and copy and paste
Others are similar.
Don't copy html format to your text file.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Tuma wrote:
> Hi, Kyungmin Park!
> Thank you for patch!
> But I have a question - how sho
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:17:49AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> After OneNAND IPL updated, apollon boot code exceeds 1KiB size,
>>
>> This patch reduces the apollon boot code
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
Now OneNAND handles block operation only.
With this patch OneNAND handles all read/write size.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/common/cmd_onenand.c b/common/cmd_onenand.c
index 9090940..2b8f01b 100644
--- a/common/cmd_onenand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_onenand.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static
After OneNAND IPL updated, apollon boot code exceeds 1KiB size,
This patch reduces the apollon boot code
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/onenand_ipl/board/apollon/apollon.c
b/onenand_ipl/board/apollon/apollon.c
index 4936e00..4d4564c 100644
--- a/onenand_ipl/board/apollon
Sorry for late reply.
At current implementation. only block write supported. Of course, I
wrote the partial write.
I will post the latest patches.
Sorry. Please wait until next Monday
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tuma wrote:
> Hello, All!
> My next quest
_4KiB, &page);
if (page_is_4KiB) {
pagesize = 4096; /* OneNAND has 4KiB pagesize */
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Some Samsung SoCs, s3c64xx, s5pc100 has own OneNAND controller
> and different OneNAND access method.
> To support th
Some Samsung SoCs, s3c64xx, s5pc100 has own OneNAND controller
and different OneNAND access method.
To support this, each board has own init and set onenand_read_page for it.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/onenand_ipl/onenand_read.c b/onenand_ipl/onenand_read.c
index 8d0df81
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Tom.
>
> 2009/9/22 Tom :
>> Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>> This patch includes the onenand driver for s5pc100
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
>>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
>>&g
Signed-off-by: HeungJun, Kim
>>>> ---
>
>
>
>>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_ONENAND_IPL
>>>> + /* setting SRAM */
>>>> + ldr r0, =S5PC100_SROMC_BASE
>>>> + ldr r1, =0x9
>>>> + str r1, [r0]
>>>&g
Refactoring the OneNAND IPL code
and some minor fixed:
- Remove unnecessary header file
- Fix wrong access at read interrupt
- The recent OneNAND has 4KiB pagesize
Also Board can override OneNAND IPL image
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 0b61d05..961c007
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:32:30AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 01:00:59PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> &g
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 01:00:59PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> #define READ_INTERRUPT() \
>> - onenand_readw(THIS_ONENAND(ONENAN
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 06:05:03PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> Some board use more then 2KiB OneNAND IPL.
>> E.G., S5PC100 loads 16KiB OneNAND IPL
>
> Why do we need a different image name based on how large the l
we can't enough memory.
you can see the code. it's better to understand.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
eers at Samsung?
>
I recommended the Minky Kang. He's working for several years for
u-boot from pxa, omap3, s3c6410 and s5pc1xx series.
But with our internal security policy it's hard to use ssh on u-boot
git. so we want to use u-boot-arm as base.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kyungmin Park,
>
> In message <9c9fda240909040234m4fdd7466ybb38d0d0618cd...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
> ...
>> >> #ifndef CONFIG_L2_OFF
>> >> - /* turn off L2 cache */
>&g
> +#undef CONFIG_CMD_NAND
>> +#undef CONFIG_CMD_IMLS
>> +#undef CONFIG_CMD_FLASH
>> +#undef CONFIG_CMD_IMLS
>> +#undef CONFIG_CMD_NET
>
> Is there any specific reason for disabling these commands? Some of
> these are extremely useful to the end user?
Since now we on
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Minkyu Kang,
>
> In message <4aa0ce3f.60...@samsung.com> you wrote:
>> This patch includes the onenand driver for s5pc1xx
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
>
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As he goes to home, I reply it instead.
>
> Nice weekend then :)
>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Dirk Behme
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear
ould have
>
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_L2_OFF
> if (get_device_type() != 0xC100) {
> /* turn off L2 cache */
> l2_cache_disable();
> /* invalidate L2 cache also */
> v7_flush_dcache_all(get_device_type());
> i = 0;
> /* mem barrier to sync up things */
> asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 4": :"r"(i));
>
> l2_cache_enable();
> }
> #endif
>
> Is this intended?
maybe not. now we only tested the smdkc100 but actual use is internal
board for s5pc100 & s5pc110.
He will be modify it.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Some board use more then 2KiB OneNAND IPL.
E.G., S5PC100 loads 16KiB OneNAND IPL
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index c9727f8..1af42ce 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ endif
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ONENAND_U_BOOT),y)
ONENAND_IPL = onenand_ipl
U_BOOT_ONENAND = $(obj)u-boot-onena
pagesize
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/onenand_ipl/onenand_boot.c b/onenand_ipl/onenand_boot.c
index 63995ce..22baebb 100644
--- a/onenand_ipl/onenand_boot.c
+++ b/onenand_ipl/onenand_boot.c
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
*/
#include
-#include
#include "onenand_ipl.h"
di
t; nblocks = (CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN + erasesize - 1) >> erase_shift;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_S5PC1XX
>> + nblocks = 1;
>> +#endif
>
> Why?
>
It's developer's mistake, no reason to use 1 block. actually internal
ROM read 16KiB data to internal RAM in case of s5pc100.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 07:58 Tue 28 Jul , Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Jean-Christophe
>> PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> > On 14:28 Fri 24 Jul , Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> >> O
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 14:28 Fri 24 Jul , Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jean-Christophe
>> PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> > On 09:55 Tue 21 Jul , Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> >> S5
of 0x4 0x20
# ubi part ubifs
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:57 PM, naveen yadav wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am using flex-onenand for my u-boot. i have added the patch for
> flex-onenand and UBI and UBIFS published by kyungmin park.
>
> I have
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 09:55 Tue 21 Jul , Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> S5PC100 has own OneNAND controller and has different interface.
>> OneNAND IPL use it to S5PC100 board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
>&g
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kyungmin Park,
>
> In message <20090721095528.ga23...@july> you wrote:
>> At bootloader, we don't need to read full page. It takes too long time.
>> Instead it only read pages required for boot.
>
At bootloader, we don't need to read full page. It takes too long time.
Instead it only read pages required for boot.
Of course, this patch reduces the boot time
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_bbt.c
b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_bbt.c
index c4
Remove unused read_spareram and add unlock_all as kernel does
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
index d482437..368fa6e 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kyungmin Park,
>
> In message <9c9fda240907192016i32c7312dh490629f2f2bb3...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> >> /* read a page with ECC */
>> >> static inli
S5PC100 has own OneNAND controller and has different interface.
OneNAND IPL use it to S5PC100 board.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/onenand_ipl/onenand_ipl.h b/onenand_ipl/onenand_ipl.h
index 412572a..b43ddfb 100644
--- a/onenand_ipl/onenand_ipl.h
+++ b/onenand_ipl/onenand_ipl.h
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 17:10 Sat 11 Jul , Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> Use the common OneNAND linker script.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
>> ---
>> diff --git a/onenand_ipl/board/apollon/u-boot.one
ee it.
>
>> @@ -114,6 +129,9 @@ int onenand_read_block(unsigned char *buf)
>>
>> erasesize = ONENAND_PAGES_PER_BLOCK * pagesize;
>> nblocks = (CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN + erasesize - 1) >> erase_shift;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_S5PC1XX
>> + nblocks = 1;
>> +#endif
>
> Again: why do we need such board specific code here?
>
It should be fixed.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi,
It's already discussed. Actually it's required for adding new S5PC1xx
series based on arm cortext8.
Please apply it.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Because of the reset_cpu is soc specific, should be move to soc
>
> Cc: D
Hi,
Thank you for pointing compiler warning.
I post the patch.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
>
> Testing recent mainline git head for omap3_evm_config I get compiler
> warning
>
> env_onenand.c: In function 'saveenv':
>
Now 'env_addr' type is loff_t so use correct field type.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/common/env_onenand.c b/common/env_onenand.c
index 476fdbc..dcf09de 100644
--- a/common/env_onenand.c
+++ b/common/env_onenand.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ int saveenv(void)
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 17:10 Sat 11 Jul , Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> Use the common OneNAND linker script.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
>> ---
>> diff --git a/onenand_ipl/board/apollon/u-boot.one
Use common OneNAND IPL linker script.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/onenand_ipl/board/apollon/Makefile
b/onenand_ipl/board/apollon/Makefile
index 49a8e90..f0744f6 100644
--- a/onenand_ipl/board/apollon/Makefile
+++ b/onenand_ipl/board/apollon/Makefile
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
include
Use the common OneNAND linker script.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/onenand_ipl/board/apollon/u-boot.onenand.lds
b/onenand_ipl/u-boot-onenand.lds
similarity index 100%
rename from onenand_ipl/board/apollon/u-boot.onenand.lds
rename to onenand_ipl/u-boot-onenand.lds
Also use mtd operatoin instead of onenand functions
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/common/env_onenand.c b/common/env_onenand.c
index 48089a9..476fdbc 100644
--- a/common/env_onenand.c
+++ b/common/env_onenand.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
- * (C) Copyright 2005-2007 Samsung Electronics
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 1:26 AM
> To: Kyungmin Park
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] S5PC100: onenand driver for SMDKC100
> support
>
> On Sat,
terface part are release at mtd & arm list.
The current status of this patch only *working* version. So I NAKed
this patch. next time Mr Kim will post the new OneNAND drivers
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
>
> I don't understand OneNAND very well (and google doesn't turn up much but
the accurate value of env_addr.
>
> Signed-off-by: HeungJun, Kim
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
