On 5/14/12, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Monday 14 May 2012 01:37:10 Kyungmin Park wrote: >> On 5/14/12, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > On Thursday 10 May 2012 01:23:40 Donghwa Lee wrote: >> >> Makefile | 1 + >> >> include/libtizen.h | 30 + >> >> lib/tizen/Makefile | 46 + >> >> lib/tizen/tizen.c | 40 + >> >> lib/tizen/tizen_hd_logo.h | 5071 >> >> >> >> lib/tizen/tizen_hd_logo_data.h | 30 + >> > >> > do you really need your own lib/tizen/ dir for a logo ? every one who >> > doesn't >> > build this still has to waste time going into lib/tizen/ to create an >> > empty >> > >> > object. at least make the addition of lib/tizen/ depend on >> > CONFIG_TIZEN >> > too. >> >> It uses the same method as others does. >> e.g., libfdt >> >> In Makefile >> LIBS += lib/libfdt/libfdt.o >> >> In "lib/libfdt/Makefile" >> SOBJS = >> >> COBJS-libfdt += fdt.o fdt_ro.o fdt_rw.o fdt_strerror.o fdt_sw.o fdt_wip.o >> >> COBJS-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += $(COBJS-libfdt) >> COBJS-$(CONFIG_FIT) += $(COBJS-libfdt) > > the difference is they have more than one CONFIG symbol going on, and their > > code base is sizable, and many arches/boards utilize it. you're adding a > single file with a single function with a single CONFIG knob for a single > board. Right, So we asked it first, which directory is proper. and suggested that the create the lib/tizen instead of others. since it's not platform, nor soc specific.
Of course this suggestion from Wolfgang. Thank you, Kyungmin Park _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot