Re: [PATCH 1/4] build: Respect CONFIG_SPL_BUILD in DT sources

ckpatch.pl check for that: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20250306201540.127646-1...@os-cillation.de/ The original thread has been idle for a few weeks, i was about to ask how to move forward with the initial problem. Regards, Hendrik

Re: [PATCH 1/2] imx8qxp: Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree

Hello, On 17.03.25 12:10, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Fabio, On 3/15/25 12:58 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: Hi Hendrik, On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:09 PM Hendrik Donner wrote: In c9713c155127 the device tree was moved from CONFIG_SPL to CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and later to CONFIG_XPL_BUILD, but the

[PATCH 2/2] imx8qm: Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree

build issue. Fixes: c9713c15512 ("imx8-u-boot: Fix SPL guard option") Signed-off-by: Hendrik Donner --- arch/arm/dts/imx8qm-u-boot.dtsi | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx8qm-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/imx8qm-u-boot.dtsi index a

[PATCH 1/2] imx8qxp: Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree

t;) Signed-off-by: Hendrik Donner --- arch/arm/dts/imx8qxp-u-boot.dtsi | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx8qxp-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/imx8qxp-u-boot.dtsi index 8058caae9ba..db6a3dedb95 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/imx8qxp-u-boot.dtsi +++ b/ar

[PATCH 0/2] Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree

As discussed on the mailing list, move instances of CONFIG_XPL_BUILD back to the initially used CONFIG_SPL in device trees. Hendrik Donner (2): imx8qxp: Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree imx8qm: Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree arch/arm/dts/imx8qm-u-boot.dtsi | 4

[PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Report an error for CONFIG_xPL_BUILD in device trees

The defines for the different build phases shouldn't be used in device trees, currently they aren't even defined for device tree pre processing, resulting in build errors. Link: https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2025-March/582787.html Signed-off-by: Hendrik Donner --- scripts/che

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Makefile.lib: Set xPL build related defines for DTB build

Hello, On 06.03.25 11:18, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Hendrik, On 3/5/25 7:35 PM, Hendrik Donner wrote: [You don't often get email from h...@os-cillation.de. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] The CONFIG_*PL_BUILD defines are currently not de

[PATCH 2/2] Makefile.lib: Set xPL build related defines for DTB build

The CONFIG_*PL_BUILD defines are currently not defined when preprocessing the dts files, leading to build problems with binman. Set the defines based on the related CONFIG_*PL values. Tested-by: Oliver Graute Signed-off-by: Hendrik Donner --- scripts/Makefile.lib | 10 ++ 1 file

[PATCH 1/2] imx8qm: Fix build when using SPL

nal blobs and is non-functional: spl.bin Some images are invalid Guard creation of flash.bin with CONFIG_XPL_BUILD option. Fixes: c9713c155127 ("imx8-u-boot: Fix SPL guard option") Tested-by: Oliver Graute Signed-off-by: Hendrik Donner --- arch/arm/dts/imx8qm-u-boot.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file change

[PATCH 0/2] Build fixes for CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in dts files

Just 2 fixes related to CONFIG_XPL_BUILD usage in dts files with binman. The second patch works for me, not sure if it is exactly the correct approach. Hendrik Donner (2): imx8qm: Fix build when using SPL Makefile.lib: Set xPL build related defines for DTB build arch/arm/dts/imx8qm-u

Re: [U-Boot] Sunxi (Allwinner A20) GPIO problems on u-boot 2016.1 and 2016.3-rc3 but not on 2015.10

10/A20 boards (I checked A20-SOM, A20-LIME2, A20-Lime and A10-Lime). Regards, Hendrik ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] Sunxi (Allwinner A20) GPIO problems on u-boot 2016.1 and 2016.3-rc3 but not on 2015.10

oes not seem to have any specific runtime option for enabling or disabling pull ups or downs, but I didn't really look into this as u-boot already misbehaves and some of our peripherals won't start on boot because of this. I hope anyone can help me out. Regards, Hendrik __

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot Sunxi breaks LCD output on Olimex Lime A10

Hi, I now tried to get the latest version from git://git.denx.de/u-boot-sunxi.git and then replaced the dram.c/h files with the ones from https://github.com/linux-sunxi/u-boot-sunxi. That seems to work. The LCD screen no longer flickers! Regards, Hendrik

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot Sunxi breaks LCD output on Olimex Lime A10

between the mainline and sunxi sources that could cause this? That was the opposite of what I am doing now (so sunxi-uboot with mainline kernel instead of now mainline sunxi with sunxi-kernel) Regards, Hendrik On 03-10-14 11:19, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 10/03/2014 10:49 AM, Siarhei Siamashka

[U-Boot] U-Boot Sunxi breaks LCD output on Olimex Lime A10

igin) of U-boot. Can anybody shine some light on this? Maybe Hans de Goede? I have seen his name pop-up a lot of times with the Sunxi branch. Regards, Hendrik ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] MPC8548 CPU v2 errata

Jens Gehrlein wrote: > Hi hendrik, > > hendrik schrieb: >> Hi all >> >> could someone pls point me to where i can find documentation >> regarding changes and the implications there of between die Freescale >> mpc8548 v1 and v2 silicone CPUs. I have searched

[U-Boot] BDI 2000 strangeness on MPC8548 v2

Hi all this is probably a beginers question, but I am finding strange things when booting with the BDI2000 on my mpc8548 CPU v2 board. I am using the bdi config for rev2 silicon as shown below: Am i missing something? ;bdiGDB configuration file for SDH/SONET Gateway (MPC8548) ; based on

[U-Boot] MPC8548 CPU v2 errata

™ III Integrated Host Processor Family Reference Manual, Rev. 2 thanks hendrik ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] SDRAM error for RD_EN and 2T_EN

o to get rid of this error? My initial efforts show by hacking RD_en = 0 is the only way to get my board to boot. but this roes not feel like the way to go. I would appreciate any help. thanks Hendrik ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de ht

Re: [U-Boot] Vitesse Phy not recognized VSC8211

Andy Fleming wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:36 AM, hendrik wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> When i included the struct as is the my board with the MPC8548 ver1 cpu >> worked correctly but the board with ver2 CPU does not work. >> A would appeciate any help

[U-Boot] Vitesse Phy not recognized VSC8211

C8548 ver1 cpu worked correctly but the board with ver2 CPU does not work. A would appeciate any help thanks Hendrik ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] Cant Create FIT uImage

Hi all I would like to boot using the new style FDT kernel booting. I have been using the guidelines in "u-boot-2009/doc/uImage.FIT/how to" and I have the latests dtc (v1.2) . But I am unable to compile the FIT image. I get a syntax error for line 1: #u-boot/tools/mkimage -f /work/kernel

[U-Boot] Problem booting CRAMFS with flattened device tree

Kernel command line is: root=/dev/mtdblock0 ro console=ttyS0,115200 In the console output i dont see ant CFI interaction. I have been throug my board's default_config basing it closely on tqm8548_defconfig but coulf not get the CFI interface to work. a would appreciate any help, thanks He

[U-Boot] CRAMFS byte oder question

Hi All The MPC8548 board i inherited used to boot a CRAMFS that was made by mkcramfs in ELDK4.1 using the "-r" option to reverse endian-ness of filesystem I have switched over ti ELDK4.2 and noted that there is no longer a "-r" for mkcramfs. I compile linux 2.6.27 using ppc_85xx cross compiler

[U-Boot] can't update U-boot when booting with BDI2000

he board not using the BDI the bootregion shows the old uboot image and was not erased. I think the sram is mapped over the flash boot region and when i try to erase and cp to the bootreagion the commands and date gets lost. Can anyone help me find the problem? th