is working.
Perhaps we do not need extra read_param(),
and use only NAND_CMD_RNDOUT to get next
block inside page loop.
Andrei
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 21:27 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 18:55 -0700, Andrei Yakimov wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 20:37 -0500, Scott W
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 21:46 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 19:42 -0700, Andrei Yakimov wrote:
> > For now lets stick with 1536 in u-boot.
> > I will send a patch.
> > At least it will not loosing flash over time
> > as nand ages.
> >
> > I
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 22:11 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 20:03 -0700, Andrei Yakimov wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 21:46 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 19:42 -0700, Andrei Yakimov wrote:
> > > > For now lets stick with
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 20:37 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 18:27 -0700, Andrei Yakimov wrote:
> > I will make a patch with 1536.
> >
> > Where should I send linux patch?
> > They have bunch of mail lists for different subsystems.
> > Andrei
>
I will make a patch with 1536.
Where should I send linux patch?
They have bunch of mail lists for different subsystems.
Andrei
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 17:25 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:42 -0700, Andrei Yakimov wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 17:38 -0500, Scott W
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 17:38 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 15:29 -0700, Andrei Yakimov wrote:
> > I did not compiling latest, I still in 2011.9 and 2.6.38.
> > I have go over latest kernel and can see they using
> > NAND_CMD_PARAM with sub command
This is my best try. I have test it with my old u-boot,
but not with master. Do not have a bench for it.
This is not very important patch. I do not find
any other ONFI user in u-boot.
Andrei
>From d76b4ae8e866affa15dd9da860574d0600969d57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrei Yakimov
Date:
exist.
I will update only fsl_elbc_nand driver.
This is least invasive patch.
Should I get just master for generation of this patch?
Andrei.
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 16:17 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 14:48 -0700, Andrei Yakimov wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just
Hi,
I just found, if NAND ONFI parameter page first copy is
bad, u-boot will never read extra copes:
fsl_elbc_nand.c:
342 out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 256);
343 ctrl->read_bytes = 256;
this code cause "read beyond buffer" error message:
nand_base.c:
chip->cmd
9 matches
Mail list logo
