Dear Graeme Russ,
In message
you wrote:
>
> I think the immediate focus should be on centralising the init sequence
> processing into /common/init.c and then bringing the new'initcall'
> architecture online
Agreed.
> Once these have been done, any board can just specific:
>
> SKIP_INIT(RELOC
Hello Simon,
Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On Jan 14, 2012 11:28 PM, "Heiko Schocher" wrote:
>> Hello Simon,
>>
>> Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Add tegra_i2c_get_dvc_bus_num() to obtain the I2C bus number of DVC bus.
>>> This allows us to talk to the PMU.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
>>> -
Hello Nobuhiro,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Renesas SH7734 has two I2C interfaceis.
> This supports these I2C.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> ---
> drivers/i2c/Makefile|1 +
> drivers/i2c/sh_sh7734_i2c.c | 468
> +++
> 2 files changed
Hi,
As there are no changes in other patches. So is it fine to only send this patch.
On 4 February 2012 01:01, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 03 February 2012 11:05:57 Chander Kashyap wrote:
>> board/samsung/smdk5250/tools/mkexynos_image.c | 117
>> create mode 100644 tools/mksmdk5250spl.c
>
On 26 January 2012 20:21, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
> Signed-off-by: HeungJun, Kim
> Cc: Chander Kashyap
> ---
> board/samsung/trats/trats.c | 18 +++---
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
applied to u-boot-samsung
--
from. prom.
www.pr
On Sunday 05 February 2012 23:34:27 Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 February 2012 22:43:33 Graeme Russ wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > it isn't just that. i don't think a single u-boot.lds for ever
Christian,
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 19:56:45, Christian Riesch wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you for re-submitting the patchset!
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Manjunath Hadli
> wrote:
> > There are two da850 SOC based EVMs, one from Spectrum digital and
> > other from Logic PD. Boards from Spectru
hi albert
Yes,actually there is already support of flash test in POST of latest
uboot.They are testing flash on every power on so am I for my board.But i
don't want to disturb sectors in which uboot code relies. Can you help me
here?
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi vk,
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2012 22:43:33 Graeme Russ wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > it isn't just that. i don't think a single u-boot.lds for every arch is
>> > feasible. the kernel method allows a
On Sunday 05 February 2012 22:43:33 Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > it isn't just that. i don't think a single u-boot.lds for every arch is
> > feasible. the kernel method allows all the common pieces to be in a
> > common header, and then the arches
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2012 17:07:41 Graeme Russ wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:45 Troy Kisky wrote:
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/u-boot-common.lds
>> >>
>>
On Sunday 05 February 2012 17:07:41 Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:45 Troy Kisky wrote:
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/u-boot-common.lds
> >>
> >> + . = ALIGN(4);
> >> + __u_boot_cmd_start = .;
> >> + .u_
On 4 February 2012 04:43, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Le 09/01/2012 08:23, "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" a écrit :
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> Any news?
>
>
> Adding Minkyu.
>
> Amicalement,
> --
> Albert.
>
Acked-by: Minkyu Kang
Thanks
Minkyu Kang.
--
from. prom.
www.promsoft.net
___
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Graeme,
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
>> Hi Simon
>>
[snip]
>> Sorry for the dealy, but hopefully I'll have it all sorted by the end of
>> the week
>
> OK thanks for the update. Would be keen to get my
Hi Graeme,
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi Simon
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Graeme,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
>>> Hi Wolfgang, Simon,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear
Hi Simon
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Graeme,
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang, Simon,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Simon Glass,
>>>
>>> In message
>>> you
>>> wrote:
This patch
Hi Graeme,
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang, Simon,
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Simon Glass,
>>
>> In message
>> you
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch shows how to do this sort of thing on ARM. I would like to
>>> see this featur
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> This patch shows how to do this sort of thing on ARM. I would like to
>> see this feature in mainline, but it makes more sense to do it
>> properly if/when generic relocati
Hi Wolfgang, Simon,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> This patch shows how to do this sort of thing on ARM. I would like to
>> see this feature in mainline, but it makes more sense to do it
>> properly if/when generic r
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
you wrote:
>
> This patch shows how to do this sort of thing on ARM. I would like to
> see this feature in mainline, but it makes more sense to do it
> properly if/when generic relocation is in. Then it will automatically
> work for all archs. For now it is a useful
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:45 Troy Kisky wrote:
>
> since we preprocess our linker scripts now, i'd suggest using #include rather
> than INCLUDE
+1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/u-boot-common.lds
>>
>> + . = ALIGN(4);
>>
Hi Mike, Wolfgang,
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2012 07:05:13 Marek Vasut wrote:
>> > On Sunday 05 February 2012 01:44:19 Simon Glass wrote:
>> > > This permits disabling the code relation in U-Boot which is useful when
>> > > debugging with an IC
On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:45 Troy Kisky wrote:
> arch/blackfin/cpu/u-boot.lds
> is warranted.
yes, this change will break Blackfin boards for sure
> --- a/arch/blackfin/cpu/u-boot.lds
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/cpu/u-boot.lds
>
> MEMORY
> {
> #if CONFIG_MEM_SIZE
> - ram : ORIGIN =
On Sunday 05 February 2012 08:26:57 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 05/02/2012 04:38, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> > On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:46 Troy Kisky wrote:
> >> --- a/include/phy.h
> >> +++ b/include/phy.h
> >>
> >> +extern struct phy_driver __phy_entry_start, __phy_entry_end;
> >
> > l
On Sunday 05 February 2012 07:05:13 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 February 2012 01:44:19 Simon Glass wrote:
> > > This permits disabling the code relation in U-Boot which is useful when
> > > debugging with an ICE.
> > >
> > > To use it define CONFIG_SYS_SKIP_ARM_RELOCATION in your board.
>
Dear Simon Glass,
In message <1328424259-12914-1-git-send-email-...@chromium.org> you wrote:
> This permits disabling the code relation in U-Boot which is useful when
> debugging with an ICE.
>
> To use it define CONFIG_SYS_SKIP_ARM_RELOCATION in your board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
NAK.
Albert,
> Definitely a toolchain setting somewhere, and one that has disappeared in
> CS two years ago.
>
> Amicalement,
> --
> Albert.
>
Thanks a lot. Now I have got specific direction.
Best Regards
Amit Virdi
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.den
On 05/02/2012 15:22, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Hello again
>>
>> Sorry for slipping the u-boot list e-mail address
>>
>> i understand the benefit of relocating u-boot to the end of DRAM but in
>> systems where boot time is critical this redundant copy is undesirable.
>> anyway i understand there is no
From: Ilya Yanok
This patch adds support for the HTKW mcx AM3517-based board.
Serial, Ethernet, NAND, MMC, RTC, EHCI USB host and both
NAND and MMC SPLs are supported.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
CC: Tom Rini
Cc: Detlev Zundel
---
Changes from V6:
- rebased on curr
> Hello again
>
> Sorry for slipping the u-boot list e-mail address
>
> i understand the benefit of relocating u-boot to the end of DRAM but in
> systems where boot time is critical this redundant copy is undesirable.
> anyway i understand there is no official way of avoiding it.
You can boot li
Hi Albert,
I have updated my pull request:
The following changes since commit 778a2c5f846b1d0b78152747af96bcd0ca04e562:
arm, davinci: cam_enc_4xx board updates (2012-02-02 10:54:37 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-imx.git master
Dirk Behme (4):
On 04/02/2012 17:57, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
Hi Albert,
> Do you want me to ignore these and honor the initial 11-commit pull
> request, or would you prefer to issue an [UPDATE] pull req for the whole
> 16 commits?
I send yaou an update pull req, thanks.
Stefano
--
=
Hi Mike,
Le 05/02/2012 04:38, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:46 Troy Kisky wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
-static struct phy_driver BCM5461S_driver = {
+struct phy_driver BCM5461S_driver __phy_entry = {
why do you have to
Hi Amit,
Le 05/02/2012 12:29, Amit Virdi a écrit :
Albert,
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, viresh kumar wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
On 2/1/12, Amit Virdi wrote:
I'm in the process of updating platform support for spear series of
SoC on the latest u-boo
> This permits disabling the code relation in U-Boot which is useful when
> debugging with an ICE.
>
> To use it define CONFIG_SYS_SKIP_ARM_RELOCATION in your board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> ---
> arch/arm/config.mk |2 ++
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S |3
> On Sunday 05 February 2012 01:44:19 Simon Glass wrote:
> > This permits disabling the code relation in U-Boot which is useful when
> > debugging with an ICE.
> >
> > To use it define CONFIG_SYS_SKIP_ARM_RELOCATION in your board.
>
> any reason for "ARM" in there ?
Because this is only for ARM?
Albert,
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, viresh kumar wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
> wrote:
> >>> On 2/1/12, Amit Virdi wrote:
> I'm in the process of updating platform support for spear series of
> SoC on the latest u-boot.
> I picked u-boot v2011.12.
37 matches
Mail list logo
